>> It is labelled correctly (java_exec_t), but I still needed
>> "setsebool -P allow_execstack 1".
>
> It's worth checking the Firefox context too.
>
> Allowing execstack everywhere isn't such a great idea.
OK, this works too and is narrower in scope:
chcon -t execmem_exec_t /usr/lib64/firefox-3.
On 11/04/2010 12:33 PM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
> On 11/04/2010 06:39 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
Hopefully this will save other people time: if you can't get the Sun jre
java plugin to work after upgrading from F13 to F14, try:
setsebool allow_execstack 1
>
> Whoops, there
On 11/04/2010 06:39 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> Hopefully this will save other people time: if you can't get the Sun jre
>>> java plugin to work after upgrading from F13 to F14, try:
>>>
>>> setsebool allow_execstack 1
Whoops, there should be a "-P" in there to make the change permanent.
> what d
On 11/04/2010 01:00 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 11/03/2010 11:49 AM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
>> Hopefully this will save other people time: if you can't get the Sun jre
>> java plugin to work after upgrading from F13 to F14, try:
>>
>> setsebool allow_execstack 1
>>
>> Bad code on Sun's pa
On 11/03/2010 11:49 AM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
> Hopefully this will save other people time: if you can't get the Sun jre
> java plugin to work after upgrading from F13 to F14, try:
>
> setsebool allow_execstack 1
>
> Bad code on Sun's part.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
Hopefully this will save other people time: if you can't get the Sun jre
java plugin to work after upgrading from F13 to F14, try:
setsebool allow_execstack 1
Bad code on Sun's part.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628031
- Mike
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
