still do not understand what STP is good for, or if it es related to my
problem :-(
Perhaps the reason for all is that the hardware [Broadcom NetLink
BCM57788 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe] does not support bridging fine yet in
FC13?
I do remember a few weeks ago FC12 was not able to use that NIC, so i
p
brizly vaan van Ulciputz wrote:
so i set up a bridge, it's running fine (the bridge itself...).
But how do i tell the default kvm-network to use the bridge instead of
using nat?
i found /var/lib/libvirt/network/default.xml,
but don't know how to change it, which manpage to use :-(
Using the KVM-G
i recognize my bridge is perhaps not that 100% configured as in the
links i mentioned earlier.
#brctl show
gives me a hint that br0 ist not "STP enabled", but virbr0 is.
i don't know what it is good for. Well, it's spanning tree protocol, but
i don't _understand_ what is it good for right now (i
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 15:24:21 +0200
brizly vaan van Ulciputz wrote:
> is it perhaps just a firewall-setting that am i missing to swich on the
> kvm-host?
I' out of ideas at this point. All my bridged KVMs act just like
real machines on my LAN. I don't remember having to do anything
special to make
meanwhile the kvm-guest is running correctly bridged in the same network
as the kvm-host.
nevertheless the guest-machine ist neither reachable from another
'normal client' in the network, nor from vpn, so same problem as i
started from :-(
again it says 'no route to host' when trying to ssh-in fro
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 10:37:48 +0200
brizly vaan van Ulciputz wrote:
> so i set up a bridge, it's running fine (the bridge itself...).
> But how do i tell the default kvm-network to use the bridge instead of
> using nat?
I don't know if there is any way to change the existing
virtual machines other
so i set up a bridge, it's running fine (the bridge itself...).
But how do i tell the default kvm-network to use the bridge instead of
using nat?
i found /var/lib/libvirt/network/default.xml,
but don't know how to change it, which manpage to use :-(
Using the KVM-GUI (virt-manager) i am not able to
On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:50:03 +0200
brizly vaan van Ulciputz wrote:
> or do i have to edit ifcfg-br0 by
> hand?
That's the way I've always done it. Just move all the
ipaddr and wot-not into the br0 file and tell the eth0
file it is part of the bridge by adding BRIDGE=br0.
I don't know if NetworkM
so, this had not been a solution :-(
i would like to give the bridge-solution a try, but don't know how to
set up a bridge in F13.
is there an easy way to set it up or do i have to edit ifcfg-br0 by
hand?
i tried from
http://www.howtoforge.com/virtualization-with-kvm-on-a-fedora-11-server
, but v
Am Montag, den 31.05.2010, 10:48 -0600 schrieb Phil Meyer:
> I think that the rule set qemu uses is called DNAT by default, so we add:
>
> -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp -m tcp -d --dport 22 -j DNAT
> --to-destination
>
> For each VM.
>
At the end i would like to connect to the kvm-guests by t
On 05/31/2010 11:02 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Phil Meyer wrote:
>
>> On 05/30/2010 11:02 AM, brizly vaan van Ulciputz wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Everyone,
>>>
>>> ich wonder why i am not able to ssh-in in this case:
>>>
>>> i have an kvm-'server' running 4 'guests'.
>>>
>>> the guests are behin
Phil Meyer wrote:
> On 05/30/2010 11:02 AM, brizly vaan van Ulciputz wrote:
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> ich wonder why i am not able to ssh-in in this case:
>>
>> i have an kvm-'server' running 4 'guests'.
>>
>> the guests are behind nat (default in kvm?).
>>
>> running fresh fedora on all machine (ho
On 05/30/2010 11:02 AM, brizly vaan van Ulciputz wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> ich wonder why i am not able to ssh-in in this case:
>
> i have an kvm-'server' running 4 'guests'.
>
> the guests are behind nat (default in kvm?).
>
> running fresh fedora on all machine (host and guest), installed from
when i installed the guests the was one possible way in the 'advanced
options' with nat. the bridged one for eth0 and eth1 was disabled
(gray).
did i miss something or have to install something do be able to use
bridging? no matter for me if it's nat or bridge, at the end all
mashines should be in
On Sun, 30 May 2010 19:02:00 +0200
brizly vaan van Ulciputz wrote:
> the guests are behind nat (default in kvm?).
I have never seen the default KVM nat work at all,
and I suspect something about the firewall rules
it constructs interact badly with the firewall
rules I already have on my host, but
Hello Everyone,
ich wonder why i am not able to ssh-in in this case:
i have an kvm-'server' running 4 'guests'.
the guests are behind nat (default in kvm?).
running fresh fedora on all machine (host and guest), installed from
live-cd, enabled sshd and made sure system-config-firewall allows
ssh
16 matches
Mail list logo
