On 4 April 2011 17:20, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Ian Malone wrote:
>
>> I think there have been suggestions that it's time to start having
>> libm linked in gcc by default as the space saving (its purpose a very
>> long time ago) is tiny.
>
> That is rather part of the idea be
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Ian Malone wrote:
> I think there have been suggestions that it's time to start having
> libm linked in gcc by default as the space saving (its purpose a very
> long time ago) is tiny.
It's supposed to be zero.
That is rather part of the idea behind a library:
You don't link w
On 3 April 2011 23:25, les wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 00:13 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
>> On 1 April 2011 23:29, les wrote:
>> > Clearly sinf is recognized, and compiles and runs. It returns 1.000 as
>> > expected for M_PI/2. But the line that is commented out will not
>> > compile.
> The f
On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 00:13 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 1 April 2011 23:29, les wrote:
> > First let me say, that while I have used C++ I don't normally use it for
> > my work and so am not throughly familiar with what it does, so if this
> > is due to a C++ error, please be gentle.
> >
> > I am
