On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 20:24:05 +0200 Ahmad Samir wrote:
> On 3 October 2016 at 15:38, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across battray
> > as a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it together as a
> > rpm and perhaps an
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 11:06:46 -0700 Rick Stevens wrote:
>
> Looking at that, I'm wondering if your line 31 in the "%install"
> section should read:
>
> /bin/python3 setup.py install --prefix=%{_prefix} --root=%{buildroot}
>
> As it is now, it's depending on a relative path that gets expande
On 3 October 2016 at 15:38, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across battray as
> a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it together as a rpm
> and perhaps and get it approved for Fedora.
>
> I have created the following spec
On 10/03/2016 10:04 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:34:39 -0700 stan wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:38:01 -0500
>> Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across
>>> battray as a replacement (and it works). So, I was
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 10:44:41 -0700 stan wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:04:31 -0500
> Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > Sorry, here is the corrected
> >
> > $ fpaste battray.spec
> > Uploading (1.6KiB)...
> > http://paste.fedoraproject.org/442684/51425714/ ->
> > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/442684
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:04:31 -0500
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Sorry, here is the corrected
>
> $ fpaste battray.spec
> Uploading (1.6KiB)...
> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/442684/51425714/ ->
> https://paste.fedoraproject.org/442684/51425714
I think this is still wrong. It might not be the probl
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:34:39 -0700 stan wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:38:01 -0500
> Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across
> > battray as a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it
> > together as a rpm and perhaps
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:30:44 -0700 Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 10/03/2016 06:38 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across battray
> > as a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it together as a
> > rpm and perhaps and g
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:34:39 -0700 stan wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:38:01 -0500
> Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across
> > battray as a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it
> > together as a rpm and perhaps
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:38:01 -0500
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across
> battray as a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it
> together as a rpm and perhaps and get it approved for Fedora.
>
> I have created the followi
On 10/03/2016 06:38 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across battray as
> a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it together as a rpm
> and perhaps and get it approved for Fedora.
>
> I have created the following spec fi
Hi,
I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across battray as a
replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it together as a rpm and
perhaps and get it approved for Fedora.
I have created the following spec file available here:
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/442597/
12 matches
Mail list logo
