Re: rc.local question/problem (partly solved w/ setenforce=0)

2011-07-07 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 03Jul2011 19:00, Paul Allen Newell wrote: | > I expect it varies depending on what clamscan thinks is needs to scan | > each time. | > Do you run prelink? It hacks binaries about on a regular basis and may | > be causing clamscan to be more active. | | If I am running prelink, I don't know it.

Re: rc.local question/problem (partly solved w/ setenforce=0)

2011-07-03 Thread Paul Allen Newell
inline and at tail ... On 7/3/2011 6:22 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 03Jul2011 17:35, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > > > My habit for a virus scanner would be sbin; these days bin is for general > purpose commands which sbin is for administrative commands (eg setenforce) > and daemons (eg sshd). >

Re: rc.local question/problem (partly solved w/ setenforce=0)

2011-07-03 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 03Jul2011 17:35, Paul Allen Newell wrote: | On 7/3/2011 5:15 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote: | > On 03Jul2011 15:02, Paul Allen Newell wrote: | > | On 7/3/2011 2:54 PM, Paul Morgan wrote: | > |>it really is bad form to run a script out of root's home | > |>directory. | > | > A little untidy, sure.

Re: rc.local question/problem (partly solved w/ setenforce=0)

2011-07-03 Thread Paul Allen Newell
On 7/3/2011 5:15 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 03Jul2011 15:02, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > | On 7/3/2011 2:54 PM, Paul Morgan wrote: > |>On Jul 3, 2011 5:38 PM, "Paul Allen Newell" |>> wrote: > |> > |>it really is bad form to run a script out of root's home > |>direct

Re: rc.local question/problem (partly solved w/ setenforce=0)

2011-07-03 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 03Jul2011 15:02, Paul Allen Newell wrote: | On 7/3/2011 2:54 PM, Paul Morgan wrote: | >On Jul 3, 2011 5:38 PM, "Paul Allen Newell" > wrote: | > | >it really is bad form to run a script out of root's home | >directory. A little untidy, sure. But... | Perhaps put it i

Re: rc.local question/problem (partly solved w/ setenforce=0)

2011-07-03 Thread Paul Allen Newell
On 7/3/2011 2:54 PM, Paul Morgan wrote: On Jul 3, 2011 5:38 PM, "Paul Allen Newell" > wrote: it really is bad form to run a script out of root's home directory. Perhaps put it in /usr/sbin , restorecon, and leave selinux enforcing the whole time. -paul Yeah,

Re: rc.local question/problem (partly solved w/ setenforce=0)

2011-07-03 Thread Paul Morgan
On Jul 3, 2011 5:38 PM, "Paul Allen Newell" wrote: > > On 7/3/2011 12:53 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote: > > On 02Jul2011 22:26, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > > | On 7/2/2011 10:06 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > > |> On 07/02/2011 09:45 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote: > > |>> That should be the case. (Of course, SEL

Re: rc.local question/problem (partly solved w/ setenforce=0)

2011-07-03 Thread Paul Allen Newell
On 7/3/2011 12:53 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 02Jul2011 22:26, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > | On 7/2/2011 10:06 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > |> On 07/02/2011 09:45 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote: > |>> That should be the case. (Of course, SELinux can break anything - if you > > > You can put it into non-e