On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:04:43PM -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
> Does this look appropriate on F12 ?
>
> PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
> 9 -11 163m 3836 2908 S 2.3 0.1 18:11.20 pulseaudio
>
>
> Sound is muted - best I can tell nothing (aside from gnome) is using the
> a
On 02/20/2010 02:44 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
Is there a way to
> see all the extensions?
Maybe a new google-chrome thread is in order ?
>
> Regarding pulseaudio I suspect that the amount of memory allocated by it
> and other applications depends on the amount of memory in the system. I
> h
I'm starting to like chrome more and more. The only issue I have with
chrome is viewing the list of extensions. Chrome is quickly gaining
extensions, but when I try to peruse the extensions I can't see all of
them. When I look at the "Most popular" ones the first page shows "Results
1 - 10 of 2,
On 02/20/2010 01:20 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> I'm using chrome on F12. It seems to handle things better. At least it
> doesn't completely crash like firefox, it just reports that there was a
> problem with flash, but it keeps running.
Thanks for your thougts ..
But 500 MB for a daemon whi
I'm using chrome on F12. It seems to handle things better. At least it
doesn't completely crash like firefox, it just reports that there was a
problem with flash, but it keeps running.
Paolo
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Paolo Gal
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> I agree that the numbers don't prove it one way or the other. I was just
> pointing out that showing numbers doesn't help.
True. But it does look suspicious. I know measuring actual memory
usage is a bit of a black art, though, so I can
I agree that the numbers don't prove it one way or the other. I was just
pointing out that showing numbers doesn't help.
As to the issues with firefox it could be flash, but the previous version of
firefox, given the same open tabs and content didn't show such high CPU
usage as soon as it starts.
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> I don't think you have an issue. Here's what mine shows with an uptime of 1
> day
>
> PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 20 0 1118m 317m 34m S 40.4 15.8 4:50.01
> firefox
> 9 -11 501m 2940 2
I don't think you have an issue. Here's what mine shows with an uptime of 1
day
PR NI VIRT RESSHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
20 0 1118m 317m 34m S 40.4 15.8 4:50.01
firefox
9 -11 501m 2940 2080 S 2.6 0.1 41:02.09 pulseaudio
Notice that firefox
Does this look appropriate on F12 ?
PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
9 -11 163m 3836 2908 S 2.3 0.1 18:11.20 pulseaudio
Sound is muted - best I can tell nothing (aside from gnome) is using the
audio system.
Is it appropriate for pulseaudio to have 163 Mb or is this a m
10 matches
Mail list logo
