Dave Ihnat wrote:
Once, long ago--actually, on Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:27:51AM -0400--Bill
Davidsen (david...@tmr.com) said:
... I believe most Windows things are done by closed source
proprietary magic, involving a man in a loincloth with feathers in
his hair dancing around a fire waving a d
On Sun, 2012-08-12 at 13:46 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> "connection refused" means nothing else than connection
> refused and that can be a outgoing firewall, firewall on the
> remote-side and any filter/networking component between the machines
You should get a different error message for when
Am 12.08.2012 12:53, schrieb Ed Greshko:
> On 08/12/2012 06:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 12.08.2012 09:45, schrieb Ed Greshko:
>>
>>> That normally means that the port is open on the remote side (krazy being
>>> your cygwin host) but that the server is not running.
>> wrong
>
> You can'
Am 12.08.2012 09:45, schrieb Ed Greshko:
> On 08/12/2012 03:40 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
>> Thanks for the prompt reply. I got the same message for telnet as I did for
>> ssh and scp. And, as I re-read my email, I managed to not report that
>> message (I actually did, but that was before I g
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 10:27 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> I have not used Windows in years beyond opening IE in an XP VM to
> check what Windows users see on a website. I believe most Windows
> things are done by closed source proprietary magic, involving a man in
> a loincloth with feathers in his
[inline]
On 8/16/2012 9:47 AM, Dave Ihnat wrote:
Pretty simple, really, and not that much different from Linux or Unix.
"sshd" underlies everything; it's wrappered in the magic that's needed for
it to exist as an installed service in Windows by the installation script.
Once installed, just go
Once, long ago--actually, on Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:27:51AM -0400--Bill
Davidsen (david...@tmr.com) said:
> There are two parts to the processing, the firewall, which may
> reject incoming packets on port 22, and the daemon for ssh protocol
> (sshd on the Linux side), which actually listens on po
Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 8/12/2012 4:54 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/12/2012 07:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Whatever you say
I look forward to your helping the OP to resolve his problem.
Ed:
What's interesting is I have not gotten any postings from Reindl so I have no
idea what he
On 8/13/2012 10:34 AM, David G. Miller wrote:
The rules in /etc/sysconfig/iptables are processed sequentially. When a packet
matches a rule the rule is applied. ACCEPT rules tell iptables to hand off the
packet to the corresponding service.
# more /etc/sysconfig/iptables
# Generated by iptab
Paul Allen Newell cs.cmu.edu> writes:
>
> [inline]
>
> On 8/12/2012 4:12 PM, David G. Miller wrote:
> > Paul Allen Newell cs.cmu.edu> writes:
> >
> >
>
> I checked ifconfig/ipconfig, plus verified the hosts file on both
> machines. I also checked the tcp/ip settings on the Windows side.
>
On 08/13/2012 06:57 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> If anyone on this list has any ideas, I am more than willing to try. That
> being said, I cannot reproduce the error and may have to wait however long
> for it to want to show itself again.
*Before* it fails again. Make sure you, A) Verify it i
[inline]
On 8/12/2012 4:12 PM, David G. Miller wrote:
Paul Allen Newell cs.cmu.edu> writes:
it is logging errors and I see the following:
Aug 11 23:43:43 yoyo kernel: [ 779.725071]
IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:1e:8c:c3:21:d6:08:00
SRC=192.168.2.14 DST=192.168.2.255 LEN=229 TOS=0
Paul Allen Newell cs.cmu.edu> writes:
> Up until recently, I have been able to scp/ssh from my F16 box to my
> WinXP under cygwin without problem. Today, it appears that isn't the case.
>it is logging errors and I see the following:
>
> Aug 11 23:43:43 yoyo kernel: [ 779.725071]
> IN=eth0
On 8/12/2012 4:54 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/12/2012 07:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Whatever you say
I look forward to your helping the OP to resolve his problem.
Ed:
What's interesting is I have not gotten any postings from Reindl so I
have no idea what he has posted except throug
On 08/12/2012 07:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 12.08.2012 12:53, schrieb Ed Greshko:
>> On 08/12/2012 06:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 12.08.2012 09:45, schrieb Ed Greshko:
>>>
That normally means that the port is open on the remote side (krazy being
your cygwin host) but that
On 08/12/2012 06:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 12.08.2012 09:45, schrieb Ed Greshko:
>
>> That normally means that the port is open on the remote side (krazy being
>> your cygwin host) but that the server is not running.
> wrong
You can't issue a blanket "wrong" and subsequently include what
On 8/12/2012 12:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/12/2012 03:50 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
I send the result with a bit of "oh, that's interesting" though I wish I
understood ...
+++
Paul@krazy ~
$ ssh localhost
ssh: connect to lost localhost port 22: Connection refused
Paul@krazy ~
+++
My mem
On 08/12/2012 03:50 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> I send the result with a bit of "oh, that's interesting" though I wish I
> understood ...
>
> +++
> Paul@krazy ~
> $ ssh localhost
> ssh: connect to lost localhost port 22: Connection refused
> Paul@krazy ~
> +++
>
> My memory of all this sort of
On 8/12/2012 12:45 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/12/2012 03:40 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Thanks for the prompt reply. I got the same message for telnet as I did for ssh and scp. And, as I
re-read my email, I managed to not report that message (I actually did, but that was before I got a
log m
On 08/12/2012 03:40 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> Thanks for the prompt reply. I got the same message for telnet as I did for
> ssh and scp. And, as I re-read my email, I managed to not report that message
> (I actually did, but that was before I got a log message and it apparently
> got wiped
On 8/12/2012 12:31 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/12/2012 02:59 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Hello:
Up until recently, I have been able to scp/ssh from my F16 box to my WinXP
under cygwin without problem. Today, it appears that isn't the case.
Last "yum update" was 29jul12. Cygwin hasn't changed
On 08/12/2012 02:59 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> Hello:
>
> Up until recently, I have been able to scp/ssh from my F16 box to my WinXP
> under cygwin without problem. Today, it appears that isn't the case.
>
> Last "yum update" was 29jul12. Cygwin hasn't changed in months (once I have
> somethi
On 8/11/2012 11:59 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Hello:
Up until recently, I have been able to scp/ssh from my F16 box to my
WinXP under cygwin without problem. Today, it appears that isn't the
case.
Last "yum update" was 29jul12. Cygwin hasn't changed in months (once I
have something that w
Hello:
Up until recently, I have been able to scp/ssh from my F16 box to my
WinXP under cygwin without problem. Today, it appears that isn't the case.
Last "yum update" was 29jul12. Cygwin hasn't changed in months (once I
have something that works I am loathe to update as I don't really get i
24 matches
Mail list logo
