Am 29.08.19 um 22:20 schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
So no more just pip. It is pip3.
Not 100% correct.
In newer Fedora versions "/usr/bin/pip" refers to the Python 3 version of
"pip". No need to use "pip3". Actually F32 does not contain any Python 2
version of "pip" at all.
(I could only check "
Am 31.08.19 um 02:45 schrieb George N. White III:
The changelog indicates support for python 2 and 3. The docs
mention using WeasyPrint to generate PDF's, -- also appears not
to have fedora packages.
Weasyprint is packaged in Fedora - though with an pretty old version:
https://src.fedoraproje
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 19:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>
> On 8/30/19 3:45 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On 8/29/19 1:54 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >>
> >> Will this automagically change on Jan 1, 2020?
> >
> >
> > No, but it will be changed in Fedora 31:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ch
On 8/30/19 3:45 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 8/29/19 1:54 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Will this automagically change on Jan 1, 2020?
No, but it will be changed in Fedora 31:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_means_Python3
Is there a way to get it changed now and see what is
On 8/29/19 1:54 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Will this automagically change on Jan 1, 2020?
No, but it will be changed in Fedora 31:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_means_Python3
Is there a way to get it changed now and see what is in trouble
(though there is very little pyt
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 17:56, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>
> On 8/29/19 4:41 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > On 29Aug2019 16:20, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >> On 8/29/19 4:14 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 16:02:25 -0400
> >>> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Do I need to do anythin
On 29Aug2019 16:54, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
These days the advice is to use:
python -m pip
adjusting "python" as desired. That way you get the pip that affects
your intended python install.
Which goes really nicely into the next question.
It seems the default right now is 2.7:
$ python --
On 8/29/19 4:41 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 29Aug2019 16:20, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 8/29/19 4:14 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 16:02:25 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Do I need to do anything, or will this be self-correcting come the
new year?
I forget where (maybe in red
On 29Aug2019 16:20, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 8/29/19 4:14 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 16:02:25 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Do I need to do anything, or will this be self-correcting come the
new year?
I forget where (maybe in redhat rather than fedora), but some
distro has u
On 8/29/19 4:14 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 16:02:25 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Do I need to do anything, or will this be self-correcting come the new year?
I forget where (maybe in redhat rather than fedora), but some
distro has utterly removed /usr/bin/python all it has n
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 16:02:25 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Do I need to do anything, or will this be self-correcting come the new year?
I forget where (maybe in redhat rather than fedora), but some
distro has utterly removed /usr/bin/python all it has now
is /usr/bin/python2 or /usr/bin/python3
I am getting dreadful warnings about my version of python when I run
pip. So I asked about this with the developers of the script I use
(xml2rfc). I bit of version testing and:
$ pip --version
pip 19.0.3 from /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pip (python 2.7)
$ pip2 --version
pip 19.0.3 from /
12 matches
Mail list logo
