Re: package rollback

2010-03-04 Thread Mike McCarty
Dj YB wrote: > On Thursday March 4 2010 00:59:03 Mike McCarty wrote: >> Personally, I think full backups from time to time, stored >> off site, are a good idea, anyway. > > thanks for the advice My dad taught me "Never turn down an opportunity to state your opinion." :-) > I agree and I ran for

Re: package rollback

2010-03-04 Thread Dj YB
On Thursday March 4 2010 00:59:03 Mike McCarty wrote: > Mike McCarty wrote: > > IMO > > > > The way to do what you want is... > > Another approach, which sometimes works, is to use a separate > partition for /home, /usr/local, and /opt, and possibly /var, > where you keep all your "non system" st

Re: package rollback

2010-03-03 Thread Mike McCarty
Mike McCarty wrote: > IMO > > The way to do what you want is... Another approach, which sometimes works, is to use a separate partition for /home, /usr/local, and /opt, and possibly /var, where you keep all your "non system" stuff, and only make a full backup of the system part, and revert only t

Re: package rollback

2010-03-03 Thread Mike McCarty
Dj YB wrote: > On Monday March 1 2010 21:32:50 Dj YB wrote: >> hello, >> yesterday I have updated kdepim related packages and many things are >> missing but will be back in future releases, so I wish till that time >> to revert to my old state. >> how do I do that? >> th

Re: package rollback

2010-03-03 Thread Dj YB
On Wednesday March 3 2010 00:04:02 Suvayu Ali wrote: > Hi, > > On 02/03/10 10:21 PM, Dj YB wrote: > > On Tuesday March 2 2010 17:38:55 Suvayu Ali wrote: > >> On 02/03/10 02:30 PM, Dj YB wrote: > >>> On Monday March 1 2010 21:32:50 Dj YB wrote: > hello, > yesterday I have updated kdepim r

Re: package rollback

2010-03-02 Thread Tim
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 15:30 +0200, Dj YB wrote: > trying to use yum downgrade kdepimlibs, require the removal of too > many packages I have no idea why... Because of interdependencies. If one thing relies on another thing, you have to have the appropriate versions of each, you cannot change one w

Re: package rollback

2010-03-02 Thread Suvayu Ali
Hi, On 02/03/10 10:21 PM, Dj YB wrote: > On Tuesday March 2 2010 17:38:55 Suvayu Ali wrote: >> On 02/03/10 02:30 PM, Dj YB wrote: >>> On Monday March 1 2010 21:32:50 Dj YB wrote: hello, yesterday I have updated kdepim related packages and many things are missing but will be back in

Re: package rollback

2010-03-02 Thread Dj YB
On Tuesday March 2 2010 17:38:55 Suvayu Ali wrote: > On 02/03/10 02:30 PM, Dj YB wrote: > > On Monday March 1 2010 21:32:50 Dj YB wrote: > >> hello, > >> yesterday I have updated kdepim related packages and many things are > >> missing but will be back in future releases, so I wish till that time t

Re: package rollback

2010-03-02 Thread Suvayu Ali
On 02/03/10 02:30 PM, Dj YB wrote: > On Monday March 1 2010 21:32:50 Dj YB wrote: >> hello, >> yesterday I have updated kdepim related packages and many things are >> missing but will be back in future releases, so I wish till that time to >> revert to my old state. >> how do I do that? >> thanks i

Re: package rollback

2010-03-02 Thread Dj YB
On Monday March 1 2010 21:32:50 Dj YB wrote: > hello, > yesterday I have updated kdepim related packages and many things are > missing but will be back in future releases, so I wish till that time to > revert to my old state. > how do I do that? > thanks in advance, trying to use yum downgrade kde

Re: package rollback

2010-03-01 Thread Tim
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 21:32 +0200, Dj YB wrote: > I wish till that time to revert to my old state. > how do I do that? I've not done it myself, but research: yum downgrade -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored

package rollback

2010-03-01 Thread Dj YB
hello, yesterday I have updated kdepim related packages and many things are missing but will be back in future releases, so I wish till that time to revert to my old state. how do I do that? thanks in advance, YB --- Begin Message --- Am Monday 01 March 2010 19:29:11 schrieb Dj YB: > thanks, > I