On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 04/06/2011 03:56 PM, Walter Cazzola wrote:
>> uhm, this sounds really strange since it is complaining on a rm
>> statement and I suppose you have rm in your system.
>>
>> In my view two things could be wrong:
>> 1. I'm using tcsh as a shell and mayb
On Wednesday 06 April 2011 20:49:20 Walter Cazzola wrote:
> Unfortunately some bad written packages (such as R) rely
> on the presence of a tex-based rpm this is what my hack solves.
The packages are well written, since they depend on latex the rpm package
should require the equivalent rpm packag
On 04/06/2011 03:56 PM, Walter Cazzola wrote:
> uhm, this sounds really strange since it is complaining on a rm
> statement and I suppose you have rm in your system.
>
> In my view two things could be wrong:
> 1. I'm using tcsh as a shell and maybe something differ when you use
> bash
> 2. d
uhm, this sounds really strange since it is complaining on a rm
statement and I suppose you have rm in your system.
In my view two things could be wrong:
1. I'm using tcsh as a shell and maybe something differ when you use
bash
2. did you install the rpmdevtools and prepared the rpmbuild di
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 18:39:00 +0200 (CEST)
> Walter Cazzola wrote:
>
>> Dear Fedora Experts,
>> after a little work-out and a big help from people in comp.text.te
>> and others on this group I solved the issue and wrote down a rpm spec
>> for a fake texliv
On 04/06/2011 01:14 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 04/06/2011 12:39 PM, Walter Cazzola wrote:
>> Dear Fedora Experts, after a little work-out and a big help from people
>> in comp.text.te and
>> others on this group I solved the issue and wrote down a rpm spec for a
Tried to build have a pro
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 18:39:00 +0200 (CEST)
Walter Cazzola wrote:
> Dear Fedora Experts,
> after a little work-out and a big help from people in comp.text.te
> and others on this group I solved the issue and wrote down a rpm spec
> for a fake texlive rpm that fools the yum system.
>
> Since I thin
On 04/06/2011 12:39 PM, Walter Cazzola wrote:
> Dear Fedora Experts, after a little work-out and a big help from people
> in comp.text.te and
> others on this group I solved the issue and wrote down a rpm spec for a
> fake texlive rpm that fools the yum system.
>
> Since I think this is can help
Dear Fedora Experts,
after a little work-out and a big help from people in comp.text.te and
others on this group I solved the issue and wrote down a rpm spec for a
fake texlive rpm that fools the yum system.
Since I think this is can help someone else I'll attach to this message
the .spec file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 25/01/2011 16:25, Walter Cazzola a écrit :
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, François Patte wrote:
>
>> BTW why do you want a2ps it is quite obsolete now for it is unable to
>> handle utf-8 encodage.
>
> I'm a long time user of a2ps and I've several scripts
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, François Patte wrote:
Get the rpm package of a2ps and install it with
rpm -ivh a2ps.xxx.rpm --nodeps
And see if a2ps works.
uhm, this is a solution but I don't like it for 2 reasons:
- in this way I lose the automatic update that yum grants me
- a2ps is just one o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 25/01/2011 11:46, Walter Cazzola a écrit :
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Mohamed El Morabity wrote:
>
>> Le lundi 24 janvier 2011 à 13:55 +0100, Walter Cazzola a écrit :
>
>> a solution could be to build an empty RPM that will simply contain a
>> "Provid
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, suvayu ali wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Walter Cazzola wrote:
That has been a great idea except for a couple of issues on some
*nonrelated" packages. To remove texlive yum forced the remotion of a2ps
and R-core (and few other but these are the most important for
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Mohamed El Morabity wrote:
Le lundi 24 janvier 2011 à 13:55 +0100, Walter Cazzola a écrit :
a solution could be to build an empty RPM that will simply contain a
"Provides: texlive > 2007" or something like this to fool Fedora
packages requiring a LaTeX distribution.
You
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Hey Suvayu,
>
> On 01/23/2011 10:56 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>
>> > Is it possible to install boost-1.37.0-6.fc11.i586 along side
>> > boost-1.41.0-11.fc13.i686 on F13 without hosing up the entire system?
>
> Could I do something
On 01/24/2011 08:07 AM, suvayu ali wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Walter Cazzola wrote:
>> That has been a great idea except for a couple of issues on some
>> *nonrelated" packages. To remove texlive yum forced the remotion of a2ps
>> and R-core (and few other but these are the most imp
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Walter Cazzola wrote:
> That has been a great idea except for a couple of issues on some
> *nonrelated" packages. To remove texlive yum forced the remotion of a2ps
> and R-core (and few other but these are the most important for me) and I
> can't reinstall them wit
Le lundi 24 janvier 2011 à 13:55 +0100, Walter Cazzola a écrit :
> Dear Fedora Experts,
> bored of the several problems of the texlive 2010 distribution for
> fedora (see my previous message about the missed hyphenation and the
> 1-month old broken dependency on the latex binary) I have decides to
Dear Fedora Experts,
bored of the several problems of the texlive 2010 distribution for
fedora (see my previous message about the missed hyphenation and the
1-month old broken dependency on the latex binary) I have decides to
remove it and reinstall it through tlmgr.
That has been a great idea ex
19 matches
Mail list logo
