Hello,
I guess that I have an EFI machine
ls /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/
-rwx--. 1 root root 112 Mar 19 01:00 BOOTIA32.CSV
-rwx--. 1 root root 110 Mar 19 01:00 BOOTX64.CSV
-rwx--. 1 root root 673992 Mar 19 01:00 mmia32.efi
-rwx--. 1 root root 848080 Mar 19 01:00 mmx64.efi
-rwx-
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 2:19 PM Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I can compare 2 machines (fedora 32).
> One of them (laptop) never boot improperly,
> grub displays the boot options and the elapsed time, and finally it boots
> automatically on the right system.
> The other one, occasionally doe
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 17:19, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I can compare 2 machines (fedora 32).
> One of them (laptop) never boot improperly,
> grub displays the boot options and the elapsed time, and finally it boots
> automatically on the right system.
> The other one, occasionally does no
Hello,
I can compare 2 machines (fedora 32).
One of them (laptop) never boot improperly,
grub displays the boot options and the elapsed time, and finally it boots
automatically on the right system.
The other one, occasionally does not boot automatically at all.
The elapsed time is not displayed,
On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 20:21 +, Steven Usdansky via users wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 12:07 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> >
> > Indeed, though I assume that some people are using the lame HK system
> > because they have no alternative (don't ask me why). Why else would
> > anyone use it?
>
> On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 12:07 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
>
> Indeed, though I assume that some people are using the lame HK system
> because they have no alternative (don't ask me why). Why else would
> anyone use it?
>
> poc
Sorry. I just use my browser and wasn't aware of the need to quote to
On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 12:07 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 00:11 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Please remember to quote context when replying on HyperKitty,
> > otherwise your message cannot be understood without firing up a web
> > browser.
>
> Or a threading email cl
On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 00:11 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Please remember to quote context when replying on HyperKitty,
> otherwise your message cannot be understood without firing up a web
> browser.
Or a threading email client...
While I prefer proper quoting, I'd rather have none than th
On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 23:03 +, Steven Usdansky via users wrote:
> Not the answer I was hoping for, but it's a question I've wanted to ask for a
> while. Thanks for confirming my worst fears 🤠
Please remember to quote context when replying on HyperKitty, otherwise
your message cannot be under
Not the answer I was hoping for, but it's a question I've wanted to ask for a
while. Thanks for confirming my worst fears 🤠
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedor
On Tue, 02 Jun 2020 11:15:37 -
Steven Usdansky via users wrote:
> I have two bootable disks, and SSD with F32 (and Win 10), and a HDD
> with F31 and a few other distros. Each disk has its own EFI
> partition. F32 mounts the SSD's EFI partition at /boot/efi; F31
> mounts the HDD's EFI partitio
I have two bootable disks, and SSD with F32 (and Win 10), and a HDD with F31
and a few other distros. Each disk has its own EFI partition. F32 mounts the
SSD's EFI partition at /boot/efi; F31 mounts the HDD's EFI partition at
/boot/efi. Both Fedoras have the appropriate entries in their respecti
On 6/26/19 8:25 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Is there a tool for fedora to create multiboot live on a USB key?
livecd-iso-to-disk from the livecd-tools package.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users
Hello,
Is there a tool for fedora to create multiboot live on a USB key?
Thank.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne
9 Avenue Alain
Well I think that the beauty of GPT is simply profoundly large disks are
now possible to effectively use.
I think that the beauty of EFI is in its ability to use a much broader base
of hardware and software possibilities.
Grub2 is one way to manage multibooting on a single disk.
Basically it is
Using grub2, I have the ability to boot windows-7 or any of at least 3
different f25 kernels or any of a few rescue-mode f25 kernels. And this
stand-alone workstation has only one hard drive. If I understand correctly
what you're asking, then yes, grub2.
Bill.
Hello,
If I understand correctly, the beauty of GPT/EFI is that I can select
the boot disk.
However, how can I manage mulibooting on a single disk ?
grub2 ?
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...
had to
use the option in the firmware to download a certificate/key and now
it's working. I have no idea how this works on CentOS because I
haven't tried it. But this multiboot Secure Boot issue came up on the
openSUSE list just last week, and the shim.efi used by each distro of
course only
Hello,
I have a nuc6i5 where I have 2 SSD disks.
The M.2 one (250Gb) is seen as sdb, while the sata one (500Gb) as sda.
Initially I have installed f23 on the one seen as /dev/sdb and I presume
the boot loader has been installed on it, correct? How to check?
In a second moment I installed CentOS 7.
Hello,
I have a nuc6i5 where I have 2 SSD disks.
The M.2 one (250Gb) is seen as sdb, while the sata one (500Gb) as sda.
Initially I have installed f23 on the one seen as /dev/sdb and I presume
the boot loader has been installed on it, correct? How to check?
In a second moment I installed CentOS 7.
On 07/25/15 05:05, R Mercado wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was reading https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide where it
> mentions that one suggested way to use rawhide is to use it
>
> "On a multiboot system, alongside a stable release of Fedora or another
> operati
Hi,
I was reading https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide where it
mentions that one suggested way to use rawhide is to use it
"On a multiboot system, alongside a stable release of Fedora or another
operating system".
Is there a guide to convert a stable Fedora system into a
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
> I would think that grub2 would boot el6 without chainloading, but I haven't
> tested that... good catch, I'll look into it. A bz ticket would help make
> sure the question doesn't fall off the radar, if you have time.
Yes. Use /etc/grub.d/4
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 02:12:30PM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:43:42PM -0600, Pete Travis wrote:
> >
> > http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/Multiboot_Guide/index.html
>
> Is it a work in progress? I see a couple of incomplete chapters:
>
> http://docs.fe
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 12:34:19 -0600
Pete Travis wrote:
> On Jun 1, 2015 6:12 AM, "Suvayu Ali"
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:43:42PM -0600, Pete Travis wrote:
> > >
> > >
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/Multiboot_Guide/index.html
> >
> > Is it a work in progress?
gt; or OSX. To address the more common questions, the Fedora Docs team has
> > written a Multiboot Guide[1].
> ...
> > [1]
> >
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/Multiboot_Guide/index.html
>
> I found this very interesting and useful. Thank you.
>
>
On Jun 1, 2015 6:12 AM, "Suvayu Ali" wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:43:42PM -0600, Pete Travis wrote:
> >
> >
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/Multiboot_Guide/index.html
>
> Is it a work in progress? I see a couple of incomplete chapters:
>
>
http://docs.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 12:32 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Is it possible to boot into a system using the old grub
> by employing a chainloader as for Windows?
> If so, is this documented somewhere?
It certainly used to be, you'd just chainload the partition with the
other GRUB's bootcode in it.
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:43:42PM -0600, Pete Travis wrote:
>
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/Multiboot_Guide/index.html
Is it a work in progress? I see a couple of incomplete chapters:
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/Multiboot_Guide/BIOS.html#BIOS-genera
Pete Travis wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> There's regularly questions here, and around the internet (ie ask.fp.o)
> about dual booting Fedora with Windows systems, or other Linux systems,
> or OSX. To address the more common questions, the Fedora Docs team has
> written a Multi
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 07:30:45AM +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> On 2015-05-31 at 13:43:42 Pete Travis wrote:
>
> > http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/Multiboot_Guide/index.html
> >
>
> Is it available in PDF form?
Same as it has always been with official Fedora docs, click on t
Docs team has written a Multiboot Guide[1].
>
> The guide is intended to help set up a multiboot system in a
> functional way, or to help get to a more functional state if needed.
> For the most part, we've tried not to make it intimidatingly complex,
> and I hope that it will aid y
Hi All,
There's regularly questions here, and around the internet (ie ask.fp.o)
about dual booting Fedora with Windows systems, or other Linux systems,
or OSX. To address the more common questions, the Fedora Docs team has
written a Multiboot Guide[1].
The guide is intended to help set
Skander Bahloul writes:
> But, i can't reboot now because of problem of configuration of grub :
Maybe someone can see what the problem is when you post your grub
configuration here.
--
Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
Hi,
I try to make grub2.
But, i can't reboot now because of problem of configuration of grub : 'Minimal
BASH-like editing is supported. for the first word, TAB lists possible commande
completions. Anywhere else TAB lists possible commande completations. anywhere
else TAB lists possible device
Thanks.
In fact my root confusion is f18's anaconda... I don't know how to part
when I faced it.
Now I use f17 anaconda and everything seems ok.
Thanks all very much!
在 2013-3-3 AM9:26，"Bill Davidsen" 写道：
> Christopher Meng wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I'm stucked with multiboot.
I have a disk with following partition:
sd1. 157GB NTFS of Win8
sd2. 55GB including:
sd5. 500M /boot
sd6. 4GB /swap
sd7. 50GB BTRFS Fedora 18
sd3.55GB not parted
sd4.32G
Allegedly, on or about 01 March 2013, Craig White sent:
> I have had an occasion (granted just one) where I had a really
> large (4TB) LVM and added more drives to the system and created a new
> 'PV' but I joined them together as a single 'logical' volume. I
> believe that is what you are referring
On 03/01/13 06:39, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Thanks, David.
>
> Maybe f17 installer is easier for me. I never install dualboot Linux on one
> hard disk. I always test such things on my slc usb3.0.
>
> Back to the title. As I used yesterday, f18 anaconda partitioning interface
> just made me more
On Sat, 2013-03-02 at 01:01 +1030, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 01 March 2013, Christopher Meng sent:
> > And, fedoraforum suggest me using ext4 instead of lvm.
>
> If you're never going to span a partition across more than one drive
> (which can be dangerous - if one of the drives fail, y
Allegedly, on or about 01 March 2013, Christopher Meng sent:
> And, fedoraforum suggest me using ext4 instead of lvm.
If you're never going to span a partition across more than one drive
(which can be dangerous - if one of the drives fail, you lose what's on
both of them), and if you're never goi
Thanks, David.
Maybe f17 installer is easier for me. I never install dualboot Linux on one
hard disk. I always test such things on my slc usb3.0.
Back to the title. As I used yesterday, f18 anaconda partitioning interface
just made me more confused.
I'll try f17 anaconda to see if things can go
Christopher Meng gmail.com> writes:
> sd3. 55GB not parted
> sd4. 32GB not parted
> Now I want to install Fedora 17 on sd3 or sd4, but I don't know howto. From
Anaconda I failed evrrytime for not enough space or some other reasons.
> So any hints availabe? I think two lvm is the way of in
Hi all,
Recently I'm stucked with multiboot.
I have a disk with following partition:
sd1. 157GB NTFS of Win8
sd2. 55GB including:
sd5. 500M /boot
sd6. 4GB /swap
sd7. 50GB BTRFS Fedora 18
sd3.55GB not parted
sd4.32GB not parted
Now I wa
On 12/11/10 22:04, John Pilkington wrote:
> Hi: I'm new to this list and haven't found a searchable archive, but I
> haven't seen this topic in Google.
>
> My box came with MS Vista and I initially added f10, which was fully
> updated until near EOL. Later I added a second disk and f12, and
> rece
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 2:33 PM, John Pilkington wrote:
> On 12/11/10 22:11, Rick Stevens wrote:
>
>
> >
> > I don't think a preupgrade which skips three releases (10->14) is
> > supported. Single upgrades (10->11, 11->12, 12->13, 13->14) generally
> > work, but skipping intermediate stages is
On 12/11/10 22:11, Rick Stevens wrote:
>
> I don't think a preupgrade which skips three releases (10->14) is
> supported. Single upgrades (10->11, 11->12, 12->13, 13->14) generally
> work, but skipping intermediate stages is quite problematic. There's
> a lot of stuff that changed significantly
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 22:04:30 +
John Pilkington wrote:
> My box came with MS Vista and I initially added f10, which was fully
> updated until near EOL. Later I added a second disk and f12, and
> recently I used preupgrade for f12-to-f13. That went well, and I
> decided to try f10-to-f14.
On 11/12/2010 02:04 PM, John Pilkington wrote:
> Hi: I'm new to this list and haven't found a searchable archive, but I
> haven't seen this topic in Google.
>
> My box came with MS Vista and I initially added f10, which was fully
> updated until near EOL. Later I added a second disk and f12, and
>
Hi: I'm new to this list and haven't found a searchable archive, but I
haven't seen this topic in Google.
My box came with MS Vista and I initially added f10, which was fully
updated until near EOL. Later I added a second disk and f12, and
recently I used preupgrade for f12-to-f13. That went
50 matches
Mail list logo
