On Thu, 15 Feb 2024, Andras Simon wrote:
This is about making \fontsize work, not the warnings, which some
other google hits suggest you can ignore. And you don't need to
\usepackage{fontspec} for \fontsize to work. (But maybe you're using
it for something else.)
I was trying to change the fo
use package anttor ,
> so I installed it with dnf.
> No go:texlive-antt
> LaTeX Info: Font shape T1/anttc/mx/n has incorrect series value `mx'.
> It should not contain an `m'! Please correct it.
> Found on input line 32.
> Likewise for lines 33..35
2024-02-15 6:39 UTC+01:00, Michael Hennebry :
> Antykwa ToruÅ ska Condensed is at
> https://tug.org/FontCatalogue/antykwatorunskacondensed/ .
> Somehow I discovered that I needed
> texlive-antt-10:svn18651.2.08-65.fc38.noarch to use package anttor ,
> so I installed it with dnf.
&
Antykwa ToruÅska Condensed is at
https://tug.org/FontCatalogue/antykwatorunskacondensed/ .
Somehow I discovered that I needed
texlive-antt-10:svn18651.2.08-65.fc38.noarch to use package anttor ,
so I installed it with dnf.
No go:
LaTeX Info: Font shape T1/anttc/mx/n has incorrect series value
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 2:14 PM Michael Hennebry <
henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu> wrote:
> Whenever I run latex with anything other than the default font,
> whatever that is, I get a font not found message.
>
> How do I discover what fonts latex can use
> and the names
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:14 AM Michael Hennebry
wrote:
> Whenever I run latex with anything other than the default font,
> whatever that is, I get a font not found message.
>
> How do I discover what fonts latex can use
> and the names and methods to invoke them?
>
> Sear
Whenever I run latex with anything other than the default font,
whatever that is, I get a font not found message.
How do I discover what fonts latex can use
and the names and methods to invoke them?
Search lead me to fc-list, but it did not help.
It listed a bunch of files,
none of which were
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 2:59 PM Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello Jerry,
>
> I do not think so.
> 1) I tried latex->dvips->ps2pdf
> 2) I tried --enable-write18
> \usepackage{pst-plot}
> \usepackage{auto-pst-pdf}
>
> When I do not get an error, and get the pdf file, the
Hello Jerry,
I do not think so.
1) I tried latex->dvips->ps2pdf
2) I tried --enable-write18
\usepackage{pst-plot}
\usepackage{auto-pst-pdf}
When I do not get an error, and get the pdf file, the
expected blue line never sh
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 2:20 PM Patrick Dupre wrote:
> You can try with (it gives the same error when trying to get the pdf file)
>
> \documentclass[a4paper]{article}
> \usepackage{pstricks}
> %\usepackage{pst-eucl}
> %\usepackage{calc}
> %\usepackage{pst-3dplot}%
> %\usepackage{pst-grad}
> %\usep
===
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 9:55 PM
> From: "Ranjan Maitra"
> To: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Subject: Re: latex/xdvi
>
>
> SOrry, that is not correct: like I said, I had that installed. But i looked
> around, and it l
support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: latex/xdvi
>
> texlive-pstricks-svn58371-55.fc36.noarch
>
> ===
> Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
> Laboratoire interdisci
FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)380395988| | Room# D114A
===
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 9:17 PM
> From: "Ranjan Maitra"
> To: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Subject: R
Do you offhand know what packages are needed? I do have texlive-pstricks
installed?
Ranjan
On Tue Jan10'23 04:38:31PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> From: Patrick Dupre
> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 16:38:31 +0100
> To: fedora
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
>
14A
===
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 6:31 PM
> From: "Ranjan Maitra"
> To: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Subject: Re: latex/xdvi
>
> Hi,
>
> I stopped using vanilla latex long ago. Does pdflatex work for you? (I
> usually use latexmk -p
Hi,
I stopped using vanilla latex long ago. Does pdflatex work for you? (I usually
use latexmk -pdf).
Sorry, I must confess that I am shooting off here, since I have not actually
looked into your use case.
Best wishes,
Ranjan
On Tue Jan10'23 06:12:24PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> From:
Actually,
If I do latex, dvips ps2pdf provides
Error: /undefined in .setstrokeconstantalpha
Operand stack:
56.9055 56.9055 85.3582 28.4527 1.0
Execution stack:
%interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval--
--nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval
Hello,
I am going to provide an example of latex/pstricks file which
seems working fine an a Debian machine, but not on mine (fc36)
latex is OK
but xdvi:
Warning: Missing charsets in String to FontSet conversion
gs:
gs:
gs: WARNING: Transparency operations ignored - need to use
Hello,
I'm using the latest ACM LaTeX class (version 1.53):
https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/publications/
consolidated-tex-template/acmart-master.zip
I've installed the required packages.
With Fedora 27, no problem.
Instead, with Fedora 28, when I run the followi
(preloaded
format=xelatex)
restricted \write18 enabled.
entering extended mode
(./sb2.tex
LaTeX2e <2017-04-15>
Babel <3.16> and hyphenation patterns for 84 language(s) loaded.
(/usr/local/texlive/2017/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/article.cls
Document Class: article 2014/09/29 v1.4h Standard
2018-03-19 20:08 GMT+01:00, Antonio Olivares :
> Thanks for helping me. I am close but I get error:
[...]
dnf install unifont-font
(as root) will solve this problem.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
2018-03-19 19:07 GMT+01:00, François Patte
:
>
> Here is MWE:
>
> \documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}
>
> \usepackage{fontspec}
> \newfontfamily{\uni}{Unifont}
>
> \begin{document}
>
> {\uni%
> \symbol{"26BD}
> }
>
> \end{document}
>
> This suppose that you have the unifont.ttf installed on your
w fedora users,
>>
>> In including a soccer ball character in Unicode, I have found
>>
>> https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/26bd/index.htm
>>
>> And it works. I try to include in latex document and the character does
>> not show up.
in Unicode, I have found
>>
>> https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/26bd/index.htm
>>
>> And it works. I try to include in latex document and the character does
>> not show up. I have tried different variations
>> after \documentclass{article}
>> \us
t; Le 19/03/2018 à 15:12, Antonio Olivares a écrit :
>> Dear fellow fedora users,
>>
>> In including a soccer ball character in Unicode, I have found
>>
>> https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/26bd/index.htm
>>
>> And it works. I try to include in la
ra users,
>>
>> In including a soccer ball character in Unicode, I have found
>>
>> https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/26bd/index.htm
>>
>> And it works. I try to include in latex document and the character does
>> not show up. I have tried differen
code, I have found
>>
>> https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/26bd/index.htm
>>
>> And it works. I try to include in latex document and the character does
>> not show up. I have tried different variations
>> after \documentclass{article}
>> \usepackage[utf8]
htm
>
> And it works. I try to include in latex document and the character does
> not show up. I have tried different variations
> after \documentclass{article}
> \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
>
> And none seem to work. Is there an easy way to include Unicode chars in
> l
Le 19/03/2018 à 15:12, Antonio Olivares a écrit :
> Dear fellow fedora users,
>
> In including a soccer ball character in Unicode, I have found
>
> https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/26bd/index.htm
>
> And it works. I try to include in latex document and the
Dear fellow fedora users,
In including a soccer ball character in Unicode, I have found
https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/26bd/index.htm
And it works. I try to include in latex document and the character does not
show up. I have tried different variations
after \documentclass
Dear friends,
I compile a LaTeX file and then see the following message when I read the dvi
file:
Warning: Missing charsets in String to FontSet conversion
kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode / --bdpi 600 --mag 1+57/600 --dpi 657 zgmb8r
mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for z
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Ranjan Maitra
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have this line from a LaTeX poster presentation file:
>
> \newfontfamily{\titlefont}{Lato}
>
> But I have been getting lots of fonts not found and errors.
>
>
>
> grep: Lato.log: No such file o
Hi,
It turns out that the Lato family is installed but the fonts are not being
found.
$locate Lato
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/afm/public/lato/Lato-Bla-LCDFJ.afm
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/afm/public/lato/Lato-Bla.afm
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/afm/public/lato/Lato-Bla
Hi,
I have this line from a LaTeX poster presentation file:
\newfontfamily{\titlefont}{Lato}
But I have been getting lots of fonts not found and errors.
grep: Lato.log: No such file or directory
mktextfm: `mf-nowin -progname=mf \mode:=ljfour
Hello:
Sorry because the dalay of this answer but I need to ask also. You can look
at the LaTeX Font Catalogue <http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/>. If you look
under the serifed fonts section, you can tell at a glance which fonts are
'tighter' than EB Garamond; not many, but wha
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:18:52 -0600 Aradenatorix Veckhom Vacelaevus
wrote:
> Well when I work with typography I preffer to use xelatex for compile
> instead of latex or pdflatex. I don't use lualatex yet because in Spanish
> we have yet some issues with the correct hyphenation.
&g
Well when I work with typography I preffer to use xelatex for compile
instead of latex or pdflatex. I don't use lualatex yet because in Spanish
we have yet some issues with the correct hyphenation.
Whe need to measure and make proofs with fonts. If you need to use
mathematical symbols th
ements of Typographic
> Style I hope you can check it and learn more, learn about more families and
> can try them to find the one you need.
Thanks very much!! I am not sure I have time to learn all this, so if
you have any suggestions on families that are also available on LaTeX,
it would be reall
Well, actually ebgaramond is one of many options available for print and
save money and paper. You need to learn a little bit of typometry. One of
the best books for learn about all this is The Elements of Typographic
Style I hope you can check it and learn more, learn about more families and
can t
. However, I read
this article about how $400 million could be saved from the government
budget in the US and decided to try if Garamond could rescue my paper.
(And it does, bringing down the number of pages from 27 to 25 from
changing the font from times to ebgaramond.)
So, is it possible to set
Well, perhaps the problem is not with the Garamond font in fact.
You should take care about few typographical details, one of those is about
the boldface. As you should know, the boldface is an invention from the
19th century, and the fashion of the boldfaces still goes on.
But Garamond, or the
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:14:02 +0200 Andras Simon
wrote:
> 2014-03-31 6:50 GMT+02:00, Ranjan Maitra :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been trying my luck at using Garamond fonts in LaTeX with
> > Fedora. From the repo, I found
> >
> > texlive-ebgaramond-svn30741.0.15
2014-03-31 6:50 GMT+02:00, Ranjan Maitra :
> Hi,
>
> I have been trying my luck at using Garamond fonts in LaTeX with
> Fedora. From the repo, I found
>
> texlive-ebgaramond-svn30741.0.15__2013_05_22_-4.fc20.noarch
>
> and installed it. I got LaTeX to compile my document, h
Hi,
I have been trying my luck at using Garamond fonts in LaTeX with
Fedora. From the repo, I found
texlive-ebgaramond-svn30741.0.15__2013_05_22_-4.fc20.noarch
and installed it. I got LaTeX to compile my document, however, I am
unable to get the boldface fonts. Not sure why this is, so can
trouble with Math generated by PPT for these slides). I
> wonder if there is some easy way to convert these slides to LaTeX. I
> have no problems touching them in beamer after a potential
> conversion. I just don't have the time to type 500 pages up in beamer.
Not to discourage you, b
re is some easy way to convert these slides to LaTeX. I
have no problems touching them in beamer after a potential conversion. I
just don't have the time to type 500 pages up in beamer.
Many thanks!
Ranjan
--
Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be
deleted on recei
On 3 October 2013 18:20, Todd Hesla wrote:
> Dear Fedora/LaTeX users:
>
> Can anyone point me to the package(s) containing the LaTeX ".dtx" source
> files?
> They don't seem to be present in my default TeXLive install (on Fedora 18),
> and
> I rather not hav
Dear Fedora/LaTeX users:
Can anyone point me to the package(s) containing the LaTeX ".dtx" source files?
They don't seem to be present in my default TeXLive install (on Fedora 18), and
I rather not have to manually look through all those TeXLive packages on the
Fedora repo.
Th
On Sun, 2013-08-11 at 19:24 +0200, poma wrote:
> On 11.08.2013 18:45, Andras Simon wrote:
> > 2013/8/11, poma :
> >
> >> Lucky 8? :)
> >> yum install $(repoquery --whatprovides */fmtutil.cnf)
> >
> > Thanks, but that wouldn't have helped, because texlive-kpathsea was
> > already installed.
> >
On 11.08.2013 19:49, Andras Simon wrote:
> 2013/8/11, poma :
>
>> Always try to subscribe to the relevant mailing list. ;)
>
> Or the one where kind users point out relevant mails from the relevant
> mailing lists :-)
>
>> http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/tex-live/2006-February/009777.html
>
> What
2013/8/11, poma :
> Always try to subscribe to the relevant mailing list. ;)
Or the one where kind users point out relevant mails from the relevant
mailing lists :-)
> http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/tex-live/2006-February/009777.html
What helped the user there was: fmtutil-sys --missing
What I tr
On 11.08.2013 18:45, Andras Simon wrote:
> 2013/8/11, poma :
>
>> Lucky 8? :)
>> yum install $(repoquery --whatprovides */fmtutil.cnf)
>
> Thanks, but that wouldn't have helped, because texlive-kpathsea was
> already installed.
>
> Andras
>
Always try to subscribe to the relevant mailing list.
2013/8/11, poma :
> Lucky 8? :)
> yum install $(repoquery --whatprovides */fmtutil.cnf)
Thanks, but that wouldn't have helped, because texlive-kpathsea was
already installed.
Andras
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.
On 11.08.2013 16:42, Andras Simon wrote:
> Thanks to everyone, who responded! What I ended up doing is what most
> of you recommended: installing more texlive packages. Since I'm
> interested in having as few extra packages as possible (my favourite
> netbook has an 8 GB ssd), I'll investigate a l
Thanks to everyone, who responded! What I ended up doing is what most
of you recommended: installing more texlive packages. Since I'm
interested in having as few extra packages as possible (my favourite
netbook has an 8 GB ssd), I'll investigate a little further, using
your suggestions as guidance
Andras Simon wrote:
> I hoped that installing
>
> texlive-latex
> texlive-latex-bin-bin-svn14050.0
>
> would be enough for having a working latex. But running latex gives
>
> This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.5-1.40.14 (TeX Live 2013)
> restricted \write18 enab
Hi again:
Well my answer was in the way to provide a whole instalation with the last
release of the packages we can get from the CTAN. It's very usefull if you
have not problems with the storage in our hdd and if you need a lot of
packages and don't want to waste time searchings and installing lat
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 20:06:34 -0500
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> sudo yum install
> texlive-{subfigure,frcursive,was,titlesec,sectsty,biblatex,bbm-macros,subfig,multirow,comment,relsize,arydshln,was,wrapfig,lastpage,endfloat,nonfloat,mathabx,mathabx-type1,sttools,yfonts}
I remember having similar tr
Hi,
I am not sure what troubles are being referred to here, but I do not
recall having much with LaTeX on Fedora (all the way from 1 to 19).
Nowadays, I do the following after every clean install:
sudo yum install -y a2ps fetchmail alleyoop pymetar libxml2-devel
blueman gvfs-obexftp festival
Hi:
I have troubles also with latex but in the alst LTS editio of Ubuntu. I
used to install the TeXlive full edition from repositories in Ubuntu and
once in Fedora. But now I see there are a lot of old packages so, sometimes
you can't work as well as you wish with a normal installation.
I hoped that installing
texlive-latex
texlive-latex-bin-bin-svn14050.0
would be enough for having a working latex. But running latex gives
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.5-1.40.14 (TeX Live 2013)
restricted \write18 enabled.
kpathsea: Running mktexfmt latex.fmt
/usr/bin/mktexfmt: line
Quoting jeu, 21 mar 2013 François Patte :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 21/03/2013 15:03, Patrick Dupre a écrit :
Quoting jeu, 21 mar 2013 Patrick Dupre
:
I fixed the issue at least temporarily by doing:
BSTINPUTS=$BSTINPUTS:/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/bibtex/bst/b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 21/03/2013 15:03, Patrick Dupre a écrit :
>
> Quoting jeu, 21 mar 2013 Patrick Dupre
> :
>
>>
> I fixed the issue at least temporarily by doing:
> BSTINPUTS=$BSTINPUTS:/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/bibtex/bst/base/
>
> But is it the right way
Quoting jeu, 21 mar 2013 Patrick Dupre :
Thank for the email.
Le 21/03/2013 12:10, Patrick Dupre a écrit :
Hello,
lyx works fine but not latex, in fact bibtex! I get the following
error: I couldn't open style file unsrt.bst
as root kpsewhich unsrt.bst gives:
/usr/share/texlive/texmf
Thank for the email.
Le 21/03/2013 12:10, Patrick Dupre a écrit :
Hello,
lyx works fine but not latex, in fact bibtex! I get the following
error: I couldn't open style file unsrt.bst
as root kpsewhich unsrt.bst gives:
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/bibtex/bst/base/unsrt.bst
but as a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 21/03/2013 12:10, Patrick Dupre a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> lyx works fine but not latex, in fact bibtex! I get the following
> error: I couldn't open style file unsrt.bst
>
>
> as root kpsewhich unsrt.bst gives:
>
Hello,
lyx works fine but not latex, in fact bibtex!
I get the following error:
I couldn't open style file unsrt.bst
as root
kpsewhich unsrt.bst
gives:
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/bibtex/bst/base/unsrt.bst
but as a user there is not response!
texhash can be run as a user, but:
te
hi,
I recently came across what looks like an awesome tool : vim-latex.
I've installed the fedora packages using yum.
[an...@localhost ~]$ rpm -qa | grep vim
vim-latex-doc-1.8.23-1.20100129.r1104.fc13.noarch
vim-latex-1.8.23-1.20100129.r1104.fc13.noarch
vim-minimal-7.2.411-1.fc13.x86_6
On Sun Jun 13 00:01:06 UTC 2010 Patrick O' Callaghan wrote:
> Has it been reported to Bugzilla? If not, you should do so.
>
Yes, it has:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603380
It was previously reported in Fedora 9, 10 and 11:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447062
but noth
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 18:30 -0400, Zbigniew Fiedorowicz wrote:
> This is a long standing bug in Fedora dating back to at least version
> 9, which not only hasn't been fixed, but has gotten worse in Fedora
> 13.
Has it been reported to Bugzilla? If not, you should do so.
poc
--
users mailing lis
users home directory within a subdirectory named .texlive2007
whenever the user invokes (pdf)latex. This is especially annoying if
Latex is invoked by a server daemon, such as httpd. Then Latex attempts
to create .texlive2007 subdirectory in what it considers to be the
daemon's home direc
Am Montag, den 03.05.2010, 09:30 -0600 schrieb r...@dwf.com:
> There used to be a place to put local *.sty files for Latex so that they
> would
> be found. Under the current latex under Fedora11 I cant figure out where
> that directory might be and am having to copy them into t
> Am 03.05.2010 17:30, schrieb r...@dwf.com:
>
> > There used to be a place to put local *.sty files for Latex so that they
> > would
> > be found. Under the current latex under Fedora11 I cant figure out where
> > that directory might be and am having to copy th
Am 03.05.2010 17:30, schrieb r...@dwf.com:
> There used to be a place to put local *.sty files for Latex so that they
> would
> be found. Under the current latex under Fedora11 I cant figure out where
> that directory might be and am having to copy them into the directory
> with
Reg,
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:30 AM, wrote:
> There used to be a place to put local *.sty files for Latex so that they would
> be found. Under the current latex under Fedora11 I cant figure out where
> that directory might be and am having to copy them into the directory
> with th
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:30 AM, wrote:
> There used to be a place to put local *.sty files for Latex so that they would
> be found. Under the current latex under Fedora11 I cant figure out where
> that directory might be and am having to copy them into the directory
> with the *
There used to be a place to put local *.sty files for Latex so that they would
be found. Under the current latex under Fedora11 I cant figure out where
that directory might be and am having to copy them into the directory
with the *.tex file to get them recognized. Not nice.
Any Latex users
77 matches
Mail list logo
