Am 06.01.2013 19:59, schrieb Doug:
> Nobody spends time writing infections
> for a system with only 2 0r 3 percent of the market. (Nor counting servers--
> those folks pay special attention to infections, even if they never find any!)
bruhahahahaha wake up
signature.asc
Description: OpenP
On 01/06/2013 08:35 AM, Tim wrote:
Tim:
Fedora 11 is the last version that I've tried on the
laptop that runs well, but I don't really like it.
Perhaps a "rolling upgrade" system, like PCLinuxOs would solve some of the
problems you mentioned with updating Fedora. There are various GUIs
availa
Tim:
>> Fedora 11 is the last version that I've tried on the
>> laptop that runs well, but I don't really like it.
Reindl Harald:
> so you stay on a HORRIBLE unsecure system forever?
Do you want to point out actual insecurities, or just presume that
merely reading internet emails or viewing webpa
Am 06.01.2013 08:07, schrieb Tim:
> As far as Fedora 9 goes, it's the last release of Fedora that I actually
> like, *and* runs well on this hardware (a laptop, and on low spec
> desktop computer).
so thats a problem, but it needs to be solved
> Fedora 11 is the last version that I've tried on
On 01/05/2013 11:54 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 01/05/2013 02:20 PM, Tim wrote:
Tim:
I don't know about elsewhere, but here in Australia, high
resolution TV
has been a bit of a flop.
R. G. Newbury:
HD will come. If you like sports you might hit on your local station to
broadcast Oz f
On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 14:51 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Wow Tim, You're still running FC9 on an internet connected device? I
> can understand why you don't accept email.
That's not the reason... ;-) That's an anti-spam technique. From over
a decade of participating in public forums, on vari
On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 14:54 -0500, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
> is there REALLY such a thing as "HD RADIO"?.as I've heard some
> stations proclaiming?
Dunno, digital radio hasn't taken off, here, either. The receivers are
very expensive, all portable ones only have a mono speaker, the batte
On 01/05/2013 02:20 PM, Tim wrote:
Tim:
I don't know about elsewhere, but here in Australia, high resolution TV
has been a bit of a flop.
R. G. Newbury:
HD will come. If you like sports you might hit on your local station to
broadcast Oz footie in HD.
We had a sports-only HD channel, that eve
On 01/05/2013 02:20 PM, Tim wrote:
Tim:
I don't know about elsewhere, but here in Australia, high resolution TV
has been a bit of a flop.
R. G. Newbury:
HD will come. If you like sports you might hit on your local station to
broadcast Oz footie in HD.
We had a sports-only HD channel, that e
Tim:
>> I don't know about elsewhere, but here in Australia, high resolution TV
>> has been a bit of a flop.
R. G. Newbury:
> HD will come. If you like sports you might hit on your local station to
> broadcast Oz footie in HD.
We had a sports-only HD channel, that eventually caved in and stopped
On 01/05/2013 07:01 AM, Tim wrote:
I don't know about elsewhere, but here in Australia, high resolution TV
has been a bit of a flop. We only have about 3 high res TV channels out
of about 16, and much of what they put to air is standard resolution,
anyway. And, oddly enough, one of the better
Roberto Ragusa:
>> Laptop resolution of more than 1920x1080 is almost extinct.
>> Damned HDTV economy of scale is killing any other format.
Ian Pilcher:
> That's the story, but it doesn't hold water ... unless there's a part of
> the world where people are buying a lot of 13" and 15" HDTVs.
I rea
On 01/04/2013 09:29 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> Laptop resolution of more than 1920x1080 is almost extinct.
> Damned HDTV economy of scale is killing any other format.
That's the story, but it doesn't hold water ... unless there's a part of
the world where people are buying a lot of 13" and 15" HD
On 01/03/2013 08:51 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 12:27:31PM -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>> On 01/03/2013 10:58 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>>> I guess the story is that there is no high-vertical resolution
>>> available yet. Confirms what I have also found.
>>
>> Apple is printing mon
On 01/03/2013 04:52 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will be in the market for a laptop pretty soon, and would like to
> find a laptop with 1200 vertical resolution (at the very least). I
> looked around a couple of websites (Dell, Toshiba, Thinkpad) some but
> was unable to spot much (did not
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 12:27:31PM -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 10:58 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > I guess the story is that there is no high-vertical resolution
> > available yet. Confirms what I have also found.
>
> Apple is printing money selling high-end laptops with 16:10 screens
On 01/03/2013 11:07 AM, Joe Wulf issued this missive:
I second that motion of having a computer function as a computer. I had
the opportunity when buying my latest laptop to go with something older
and less capable, but having a decent screen resolution of 1920x1200 or
a newer, more capable mode
ct: Re: laptops with 1200 vertical resolution
>
>
>
>
>
>On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>
>On 01/03/2013 10:58 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>>> I guess the story is that there is no high-vertical resolution
>>> available yet. Confirms what I
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 10:58:55AM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 10:41:06 -0600 Richard Shaw
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Dale Dellutri
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Ranjan Maitra
> > > wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I will be in the ma
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 10:58 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > I guess the story is that there is no high-vertical resolution
> > available yet. Confirms what I have also found.
>
> Apple is printing money selling high-end laptops with 16:10 screens.
> Meanw
On 01/03/2013 10:58 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> I guess the story is that there is no high-vertical resolution
> available yet. Confirms what I have also found.
Apple is printing money selling high-end laptops with 16:10 screens.
Meanwhile, Dell, HP, Lenovo, etc. would kill their firstborn children
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 10:41:06 -0600 Richard Shaw
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Ranjan Maitra
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I will be in the market for a laptop pretty soon, and would like to
> >> find a laptop with 1200 vertical
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 10:41:06 -0600 Richard Shaw
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Ranjan Maitra
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I will be in the market for a laptop pretty soon, and would like to
> >> find a laptop with 1200 vertical
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Ranjan Maitra
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I will be in the market for a laptop pretty soon, and would like to
>> find a laptop with 1200 vertical resolution (at the very least). I
>> looked around a couple of websit
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Ranjan Maitra
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will be in the market for a laptop pretty soon, and would like to
> find a laptop with 1200 vertical resolution (at the very least). I
> looked around a couple of websites (Dell, Toshiba, Thinkpad) some but
> was unable to spot much
Hi,
I will be in the market for a laptop pretty soon, and would like to
find a laptop with 1200 vertical resolution (at the very least). I
looked around a couple of websites (Dell, Toshiba, Thinkpad) some but
was unable to spot much (did not look at everything). Are these
available anymore? What w
26 matches
Mail list logo
