On Sun, 2013-08-11 at 19:24 +0200, poma wrote:
> On 11.08.2013 18:45, Andras Simon wrote:
> > 2013/8/11, poma :
> >
> >> Lucky 8? :)
> >> yum install $(repoquery --whatprovides */fmtutil.cnf)
> >
> > Thanks, but that wouldn't have helped, because texlive-kpathsea was
> > already installed.
> >
On 11.08.2013 19:49, Andras Simon wrote:
> 2013/8/11, poma :
>
>> Always try to subscribe to the relevant mailing list. ;)
>
> Or the one where kind users point out relevant mails from the relevant
> mailing lists :-)
>
>> http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/tex-live/2006-February/009777.html
>
> What
2013/8/11, poma :
> Always try to subscribe to the relevant mailing list. ;)
Or the one where kind users point out relevant mails from the relevant
mailing lists :-)
> http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/tex-live/2006-February/009777.html
What helped the user there was: fmtutil-sys --missing
What I tr
On 11.08.2013 18:45, Andras Simon wrote:
> 2013/8/11, poma :
>
>> Lucky 8? :)
>> yum install $(repoquery --whatprovides */fmtutil.cnf)
>
> Thanks, but that wouldn't have helped, because texlive-kpathsea was
> already installed.
>
> Andras
>
Always try to subscribe to the relevant mailing list.
2013/8/11, poma :
> Lucky 8? :)
> yum install $(repoquery --whatprovides */fmtutil.cnf)
Thanks, but that wouldn't have helped, because texlive-kpathsea was
already installed.
Andras
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.
On 11.08.2013 16:42, Andras Simon wrote:
> Thanks to everyone, who responded! What I ended up doing is what most
> of you recommended: installing more texlive packages. Since I'm
> interested in having as few extra packages as possible (my favourite
> netbook has an 8 GB ssd), I'll investigate a l
Thanks to everyone, who responded! What I ended up doing is what most
of you recommended: installing more texlive packages. Since I'm
interested in having as few extra packages as possible (my favourite
netbook has an 8 GB ssd), I'll investigate a little further, using
your suggestions as guidance
Andras Simon wrote:
> I hoped that installing
>
> texlive-latex
> texlive-latex-bin-bin-svn14050.0
>
> would be enough for having a working latex. But running latex gives
>
> This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.5-1.40.14 (TeX Live 2013)
> restricted \write18 enabled.
>
> kpathsea: Running mkt
Hi again:
Well my answer was in the way to provide a whole instalation with the last
release of the packages we can get from the CTAN. It's very usefull if you
have not problems with the storage in our hdd and if you need a lot of
packages and don't want to waste time searchings and installing lat
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 20:06:34 -0500
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> sudo yum install
> texlive-{subfigure,frcursive,was,titlesec,sectsty,biblatex,bbm-macros,subfig,multirow,comment,relsize,arydshln,was,wrapfig,lastpage,endfloat,nonfloat,mathabx,mathabx-type1,sttools,yfonts}
I remember having similar tr
Hi,
I am not sure what troubles are being referred to here, but I do not
recall having much with LaTeX on Fedora (all the way from 1 to 19).
Nowadays, I do the following after every clean install:
sudo yum install -y a2ps fetchmail alleyoop pymetar libxml2-devel
blueman gvfs-obexftp festival sl
Hi:
I have troubles also with latex but in the alst LTS editio of Ubuntu. I
used to install the TeXlive full edition from repositories in Ubuntu and
once in Fedora. But now I see there are a lot of old packages so, sometimes
you can't work as well as you wish with a normal installation.
Last mont
I hoped that installing
texlive-latex
texlive-latex-bin-bin-svn14050.0
would be enough for having a working latex. But running latex gives
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.5-1.40.14 (TeX Live 2013)
restricted \write18 enabled.
kpathsea: Running mktexfmt latex.fmt
/usr/bin/mktexfmt: line 395
13 matches
Mail list logo
