Fernando Lozano writes:
> Imagine a bunch of desktops (or developer workstations) being upgraded
> using fedup. Their software would be very similar.
>
> And my idea is that fedup would download from the net anything missing
> (or newer) than the lan cache, so different configurations would be
>
Hi,
Imagine if fedup worked using yum "keep cache" and then setup a http or
nfs share for other machines to reuse all downloaded content. Then other
machines wouldn't need to download / install anything to their local HDs
before rebooting (except for the new grub, kernel and a few binaries
kil
On 07/17/2013 12:05 PM, Fernando Lozano wrote:
My ideas make sense only for repeating the processes on multiple
machines. If I could download all packages / and store then in a DVD
media or a shared disk beforehand, it would save time for the second
machine and so. Like we can do today with the i
Hi,
It seems to work fine now, and I like to have recent NVIDIA drivers. I
don't mind upgrading twice a year when it works, and it might have the
advantage that per each upgrade, not as many changes are introduced as
when upgrading less frequently.
Until Fedora comes with a more radical change (
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:38:49AM -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, lee wrote:
>
> >Michael Hennebry writes:
>
> >>Having precisely one computer meant that I couldn't
> >>look for on-line help while doing an install.
> >
> >That's one big advantage of the life systems some d
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, lee wrote:
Michael Hennebry writes:
Having precisely one computer meant that I couldn't
look for on-line help while doing an install.
That's one big advantage of the life systems some distributions have:
You can always boot that and look for help even while installing.
Fernando Lozano writes:
> Hi,
>
> In my case, I found Fedora very expensive to upgrade.
That I can understand --- upgrading twice a year, especially when
it's questionable if the upgrade works --- can be painful, all the more
when you have many machines to upgrade. It gave me
Hi,
In my case, I found Fedora very expensive to upgrade.
>>> That I can understand --- upgrading twice a year, especially when
>>> it's questionable if the upgrade works --- can be painful, all the more
>>> when you have many machines to upgrade. It gave me a lot to worry about
>>> even wit
Michael Hennebry writes:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, lee wrote:
>
>> Michael Hennebry writes:
>>
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, lee wrote:
>>
>>> In my case, I found Fedora very expensive to upgrade.
>>
>> That I can understand --- upgrading twice a year, especially when
>> it's questionable if the upgrad
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, lee wrote:
Michael Hennebry writes:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, lee wrote:
In my case, I found Fedora very expensive to upgrade.
That I can understand --- upgrading twice a year, especially when
it's questionable if the upgrade works --- can be painful, all the more
when yo
Michael Hennebry writes:
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, lee wrote:
> In my case, I found Fedora very expensive to upgrade.
That I can understand --- upgrading twice a year, especially when
it's questionable if the upgrade works --- can be painful, all the more
when you have many machines to upgrade.
11 matches
Mail list logo
