On 03/03/2013 07:26 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 03/03/2013 12:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.03.2013 18:18, schrieb Frank McCormick:
this does not matter
/bin and /usr/bin is the same after UsrMove
What does not matter? That which ld comes up with /bin/ld ?
clearly yes
/bin is a symli
On 03/03/2013 12:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.03.2013 18:18, schrieb Frank McCormick:
this does not matter
/bin and /usr/bin is the same after UsrMove
What does not matter? That which ld comes up with /bin/ld ?
clearly yes
/bin is a symlink to /usr/bin
/sbin is a symlink to /usr/sbin
Am 03.03.2013 18:18, schrieb Frank McCormick:
>>> this does not matter
>>> /bin and /usr/bin is the same after UsrMove
>
>
> What does not matter? That which ld comes up with /bin/ld ?
clearly yes
/bin is a symlink to /usr/bin
/sbin is a symlink to /usr/sbin
both are the same files
signat
On 03/03/2013 11:42 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.03.2013 17:33, schrieb Frank McCormick:
and you made sure the damage was fixed?
* /etc/mtab is there AND a symlink
* "which ld" gives a correct output
Sorry, I stand correctedit's early.
[frank@localhost etc]$ stat mtab
File: ‘
Am 03.03.2013 17:33, schrieb Frank McCormick:
>> and you made sure the damage was fixed?
>>
>> * /etc/mtab is there AND a symlink
>> * "which ld" gives a correct output
>
> There is no /etc/mtab on my machine...
and you wonder about anything?
> there is a mtab.fuselock with a size of 0
does n
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 11:33:58 -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
> > [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ which ld
> > /usr/bin/ld
>
> which ld on my machine comes up with /bin/ld...
Consider $PATH.
$ which ld
/usr/bin/ld
$ su -
Password:
# which ld
/bin/ld
> /usr/bin/ld has a symlink which
On 03/03/2013 11:12 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.03.2013 13:50, schrieb Frank McCormick:
Very interesting...am I one of the very few affected by this ?? I found a bug
on bugzilla
that referred to programs in the util-linux package as causing the
problem...they were apparently
updated but th
Am 03.03.2013 13:50, schrieb Frank McCormick:
> Very interesting...am I one of the very few affected by this ?? I found a bug
> on bugzilla
> that referred to programs in the util-linux package as causing the
> problem...they were apparently
> updated but that didn't solve my problem
and you m
On 02/03/13 09:00 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Frank McCormick wrote:
Still trying to discover the cause of errors being generated when
grub2-mkconfig
is run.
Tne problem first surfaced after a new kernel during a recent update
on Fedora
18. The error was something along the lines of "can't find a
Frank McCormick wrote:
Still trying to discover the cause of errors being generated when grub2-mkconfig
is run.
Tne problem first surfaced after a new kernel during a recent update on Fedora
18. The error was something along the lines of "can't find a usable template" .
So I tried to manually gen
Still trying to discover the cause of errors being generated when
grub2-mkconfig is run.
Tne problem first surfaced after a new kernel during a recent update on
Fedora 18. The error was something along the lines of "can't find a
usable template" .
So I tried to manually generate a grub.cfg file
11 matches
Mail list logo