Re: gpk-update-viewer vs. yum

2010-12-20 Thread Beartooth
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:01:08 -0400, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: > | From: BeartoothHOS | Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 > 18:51:05 + (UTC) | > | Is it just me?? > | > | I've noticed, on several machines (PC, laptop, netbook) that if | the > machine has no connection, or thinks it has none, the

Re: gpk-update-viewer vs. yum

2010-06-19 Thread D. Hugh Redelmeier
| From: BeartoothHOS | Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:51:05 + (UTC) | | Is it just me?? | | I've noticed, on several machines (PC, laptop, netbook) that if | the machine has no connection, or thinks it has none, the gpk function | claims there are no updates; but if I doubt that an

Re: gpk-update-viewer vs. yum

2010-04-21 Thread Richard Hughes
On 16 April 2010 22:35, Rick Stevens wrote: > Hmmm, I'd call that a work-around, not a solution.  The solution is for > gpk (in fact, all GUI-based stuff) to query the NICs via something like > >        ip link show up | egrep "(eth.:|wlan.:)" > > and see if any network link is up.  Or scan /proc/

Re: gpk-update-viewer vs. yum

2010-04-20 Thread BeartoothHOS
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:14:31 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 18:51 +, BeartoothHOS wrote: >> Is it just me?? [] > Sounds like the old "interface not managed by NetworkManager" trick. > Some Gnome apps rely on NM to tell them if the machine is connecte

Re: gpk-update-viewer vs. yum

2010-04-16 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 14:35:48 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote: > > The problem is if you have to authenticate using a network-based > mechanism (e.g. NIS/NIS+ or LDAP), then you have to use the classic > networking stuff since NM doesn't fire until you're logged in AND are > using a GUI. > > Perh

Re: gpk-update-viewer vs. yum

2010-04-16 Thread Rick Stevens
On 04/16/2010 01:44 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 18:51 +, BeartoothHOS wrote: >> Is it just me?? >> >> I've noticed, on several machines (PC, laptop, netbook) that if >> the machine has no connection, or thinks it has none, the gpk function >> claims there ar

Re: gpk-update-viewer vs. yum

2010-04-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 18:51 +, BeartoothHOS wrote: > Is it just me?? > > I've noticed, on several machines (PC, laptop, netbook) that if > the machine has no connection, or thinks it has none, the gpk function > claims there are no updates; but if I doubt that and run yum update

gpk-update-viewer vs. yum

2010-04-16 Thread BeartoothHOS
Is it just me?? I've noticed, on several machines (PC, laptop, netbook) that if the machine has no connection, or thinks it has none, the gpk function claims there are no updates; but if I doubt that and run yum update, it may immediately get over a hundred -- or at least repo