Re: gnuplot 5.2

2019-06-09 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 6/9/19 4:33 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Why gnuplot has not been upgraded in fedora 30 We still get 5.0.6 while 5.2 is available for a while ? It appears the maintainer is absent. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457252 There is a 5.2.5 version available at: https://copr-be.cloud.fe

gnuplot 5.2

2019-06-09 Thread Patrick Dupre
Hello, Why gnuplot has not been upgraded in fedora 30 We still get 5.0.6 while 5.2 is available for a while ? Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinair

Re: gnuplot 5.2

2018-10-16 Thread Ronaldo Mercado
Hello Patrick I placed the spec file here. https://kiso49j.fedorapeople.org Regards, Ronaldo ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://get

Re: gnuplot 5.2

2018-10-15 Thread Patrick Dupre
Hello Ronaldo,   Maybe, you could send me the spec file that you use for gnuplot 5.2.   Thank.   === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral

Re: gnuplot 5.2

2018-10-15 Thread Ronaldo Mercado
Thanks Jose for creating the libcerf package. I placed it in copr and it generated packages okay. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/kiso49j/libcerf/build/810018/ I also attempted a gnuplot 5.2 (without libcerf) that failed because I did not include "emacs" in BuildRequir

Re: gnuplot 5.2

2018-10-15 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Sunday, 14 October 2018 06.27.55 WEST Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 10/13/18 10:18 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > Could update the gnuplot package in fedora 28? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457252 Since gnuplot is also the basis for some other packages and any update requires lots

Re: gnuplot 5.2

2018-10-14 Thread Ronaldo Mercado
Hi, The warnings seem benign. They are related to the spec file that has references for an emacs-related package that is commented out. The error about "directory not found" seems relevant. Do the "prepare" and "build" steps of rpmbuild work okay? rpmbuild -bp gnuplot.spec rpmbuild -bc gnuplot.sp

Re: gnuplot 5.2

2018-10-14 Thread Patrick Dupre
Hello, I tried to generate a rpm file. I get the following error: rpmbuild -bb gnuplot.spec RPM build errors: Macro expanded in comment on line 110: %{name} Macro expanded in comment on line 113: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Macro expanded in comment on line 114: %{_emacs_version

Re: gnuplot 5.2

2018-10-13 Thread Ed Greshko
On 10/14/18 1:18 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Could update the gnuplot package in fedora 28? > In addition, could you compile it with the cerf library? Why don't you file a BZ against gunplot with your request?  The maintainer may or may not see this on this general mailing list. -- Cardinal Rul

Re: gnuplot 5.2

2018-10-13 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 10/13/18 10:18 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Could update the gnuplot package in fedora 28? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457252 In addition, could you compile it with the cerf library? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476616 _

gnuplot 5.2

2018-10-13 Thread Patrick Dupre
Hello, Could update the gnuplot package in fedora 28? In addition, could you compile it with the cerf library? Thank === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie