[SOLVED:] k3b [WAS: Re: gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brasero (maybe bug)]]

2011-11-05 Thread Paul Allen Newell
I have submitted a bug on k3b regarding crashing on "simulate write" when an actual burn works. Aside from that, it works great (in my opinion, better than brasero and/or gnomebaker). I'm still playing to make sure I am 100% certain, but I think I've got another item checked off on the list of

Re: gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brasero (maybe bug)]

2011-11-05 Thread Paul Allen Newell
On 11/5/2011 4:19 AM, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote: > The find command will easily determine the longest path in your directory > tree. > > If "~/foo" is the root of the tree that you want to burn, try: > > $ cd ~/foo > $ find . -print> ../paths.txt > > Awhile back I'd written a python

Re: gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brasero (maybe bug)]

2011-11-05 Thread Paul Allen Newell
On 11/5/2011 5:19 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > No problem. yum will take care of dependencies when you install it, and > it should run fine. For example, I'm writing this in Evolution, even > though I run KDE as my desktop (i.e. the other way round). > > poc > Poc: I would agree but as I've

Re: gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brasero (maybe bug)]

2011-11-05 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 20:04 -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > On 11/4/2011 6:51 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > I've not been following this thread, but is "try k3b" too obvious? > > (apart from pointing out that it's Brasero, not Brassero). > > > > poc > > > Poc: > > My bad on spelling of

Re: gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brasero (maybe bug)]

2011-11-05 Thread Don Quixote de la Mancha
The find command will easily determine the longest path in your directory tree. If "~/foo" is the root of the tree that you want to burn, try: $ cd ~/foo $ find . -print > ../paths.txt I expect there is some simple combination of command-line tools that would yield the length of the longes

Re: gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brasero (maybe bug)]

2011-11-04 Thread Paul Allen Newell
On 11/4/2011 9:50 PM, Don Quixote de la Manvha wrote: > At one time gnome and kde did not interoperate well because of different > conventions for some GUI stuff like the clipboard but those were harmonized > long ago. > > You don't need all of kde, just the dependencies. > > Your problem may be

Re: gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brasero (maybe bug)]

2011-11-04 Thread Don Quixote de la Manvha
At one time gnome and kde did not interoperate well because of different conventions for some GUI stuff like the clipboard but those were harmonized long ago. You don't need all of kde, just the dependencies. Your problem may be that you are exceeding the maximum length for an absolute pathnam

Re: gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brasero (maybe bug)]

2011-11-04 Thread Paul Allen Newell
On 11/4/2011 8:26 PM, fred smith wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 08:24:39PM -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote: >> On 11/4/2011 8:22 PM, fred smith wrote: >>> You CAN do "yum install k3b" and it'll install the necessary KDE >>> bits along with k3b. that's the way I always do it. >>> >> Fred: >> >> I w

Re: gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brasero (maybe bug)]

2011-11-04 Thread fred smith
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 08:24:39PM -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > On 11/4/2011 8:22 PM, fred smith wrote: > > > > You CAN do "yum install k3b" and it'll install the necessary KDE > > bits along with k3b. that's the way I always do it. > > > > Fred: > > I was unaware that kde packages could ope

Re: gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brasero (maybe bug)]

2011-11-04 Thread Paul Allen Newell
On 11/4/2011 8:22 PM, fred smith wrote: > > You CAN do "yum install k3b" and it'll install the necessary KDE > bits along with k3b. that's the way I always do it. > Fred: I was unaware that kde packages could operate under gnome and vice versa? No conflicts in doing such? Thanks, Paul -- user

Re: gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brasero (maybe bug)]

2011-11-04 Thread fred smith
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 08:04:37PM -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > On 11/4/2011 6:51 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > I've not been following this thread, but is "try k3b" too obvious? > > (apart from pointing out that it's Brasero, not Brassero). > > > > poc > > > Poc: > > My bad on spell

Re: gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brasero (maybe bug)]

2011-11-04 Thread Paul Allen Newell
On 11/4/2011 6:51 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I've not been following this thread, but is "try k3b" too obvious? > (apart from pointing out that it's Brasero, not Brassero). > > poc > Poc: My bad on spelling of Brasero ... thank you for correction. As for k3b, its for KDE if I am correct?