On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 12:23 PM Patrick Dupre via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am sorry, but I think that I solved the issue by running a make clean
> Now the generated code is the same on both machines.
>
> Probably I have an object from a previous version of gsl
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 11:21:46PM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: gcc/gsl
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 10:50:38PM +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 09:25:40AM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> No, I do not use such options
Then I don't believe you can get different assembly from the same compiler
same source same options. GCC ought to produce the same output
reproduceably (unless the source uses __DATE__, __TIME__ or __TI
:46 AM
> From: "Michael Hennebry"
> To: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Subject: Re: gcc/gsl
>
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2024, Roger Heflin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 4:25?PM Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>&g
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 3:58 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 1:33 PM Patrick Dupre via users
> wrote:
> >
> > I am not sure this issue is entirely relevant on this mailing list.
> > Maybe you could redirect me.
> >
> > Which one is the good one?
> > Why this behavior?
>
Some
I force a compilation in case of an update of a library like gsl?
Thank to every body for the help.
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2024 at 9:56 AM
> From: "Jakub Jelinek"
> To: "Patrick Dupre"
> Cc: "Community support for Fedora users" ,
> "
On Wed, 13 Nov 2024, Roger Heflin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 4:25?PM Patrick Dupre wrote:
How different are the values? How many significant figures match? 0? 5?
relatve difference: 2.7e-8
"noise" ~ 1e-35
values < 2e-23
What significant figure is it of the result? Heavy calc
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 4:25 PM Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> >
> > How different are the values? How many significant figures match? 0?
> > 5?
> relatve difference: 2.7e-8
> "noise" ~ 1e-35
> values < 2e-23
>
What significant figure is it of the result? Heavy calculations are
sensitive to th
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 1:33 PM Patrick Dupre via users
wrote:
>
> I am not sure this issue is entirely relevant on this mailing list.
> Maybe you could redirect me.
>
> The same application (relatively heavy code), provides different values when
> it
> is run and compiled on 2 different machines
How different are the values? How many significant figures match? 0? 5?
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 12:33 PM Patrick Dupre via users
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am not sure this issue is entirely relevant on this mailing list.
> Maybe you could redirect me.
>
> The same application (relatively heav
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024, Stephen Morris wrote:
Just my 2 cents worth. I develop at work in a language called SAS, which
is interpretive like Python is. I see the sort of precision issues you are
highlighting all the time, and the software vendor has written papers (which
I can't lay my hands o
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 11:21:46PM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > Subject: Re: gcc/gsl
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 10:50:38PM +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 13 Nov 2024, at 18:33, Patrick Dupre via users
> >
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 10:50:38PM +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> >
> > > On 13 Nov 2024, at 18:33, Patrick Dupre via users
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Why this behavior?
> >
> > Do both versions produce the same results when copied to the other machine?
> The results depends on the machine
On 14/11/24 08:52, Roger Heflin wrote:
How different are the values? How many significant figures match? 0? 5?
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 12:33 PM Patrick Dupre via users
wrote:
Hello,
I am not sure this issue is entirely relevant on this mailing list.
Maybe you could redirect me.
The sam
>
> How different are the values? How many significant figures match? 0? 5?
relatve difference: 2.7e-8
"noise" ~ 1e-35
values < 2e-23
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 12:33 PM Patrick Dupre via users
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am not sure this issue is entirely relevant on this mailing l
> Subject: Re: gcc/gsl
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 10:50:38PM +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 13 Nov 2024, at 18:33, Patrick Dupre via users
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Why this behavior?
> > &g
> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2024 at 8:58 PM
> From: "Jeffrey Walton"
> To: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Cc: "Patrick Dupre"
> Subject: Re: gcc/gsl
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 1:33 PM Patrick Dupre via users
> wrote:
> &g
>
> > On 13 Nov 2024, at 18:33, Patrick Dupre via users
> > wrote:
> >
> > Why this behavior?
>
> Do both versions produce the same results when copied to the other machine?
The results depends on the machine which has compiled the code, not on the
machine
where the code is run.
Is there a way
> On 13 Nov 2024, at 18:33, Patrick Dupre via users
> wrote:
>
> Why this behavior?
Do both versions produce the same results when copied to the other machine?
Might be compiler defaults are different. Do you have config for gcc in $HOME
somewhere?
Try creating a new user on both machines
> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2024 at 8:11 PM
> From: "home user via users"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Cc: "home user"
> Subject: Re: gcc/gsl
>
> On 11/13/24 11:32 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I
On 11/13/24 11:32 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
Hello,
I am not sure this issue is entirely relevant on this mailing list.
Maybe you could redirect me.
The same application (relatively heavy code), provides different values when it
is run and compiled on 2 different machines.
Both F40 (las
Hello,
I am not sure this issue is entirely relevant on this mailing list.
Maybe you could redirect me.
The same application (relatively heavy code), provides different values when it
is run and compiled on 2 different machines.
Both F40 (last update)
gcc (GCC) 14.2.1 20240912 (Red Hat 14.2.1-3)
22 matches
Mail list logo
