Re: firewalld v. libvirtd

2013-02-01 Thread Robert Locke
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 10:34 +, Jorge Martínez López wrote: > Hi Rob: > > 2013/1/28 Robert Locke > > > > I would like to associate the virbr0 interface, created by libvirtd, to > > be considered part of the "internal" zone, since I "trust" my own VMs > > talking to the host. But, what is the

Re: firewalld v. libvirtd

2013-01-28 Thread Jorge Martínez López
Hi Rob: 2013/1/28 Robert Locke > > I would like to associate the virbr0 interface, created by libvirtd, to > be considered part of the "internal" zone, since I "trust" my own VMs > talking to the host. But, what is the "supportable" method for > accomplishing this? There is no ifcfg- where I coul

firewalld v. libvirtd

2013-01-27 Thread Robert Locke
Just took the leap in to Fedora 18 from 17. In Fedora 17, I simply added a custom rule in the old system-config-firewall to point to a file that had a trust of the libvirt based virbr0 interface. The new system-config-firewall has me a bit confused I would like to keep the new firewalld and