On Jun 19, 2021, at 18:00, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> How to I extract the .tgz (or the .spec) file from a src.rpm ?
You already have fedpkg. You can run
fedpkg co -a gsl
(Add a —branch f34 to get the Fedora 34 branch, or check it out manually with
git)
And it will check out the
On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 4:01 PM Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> Yes,
>
> How to I extract the .tgz (or the .spec) file from a src.rpm ?
If you run "rpm -i https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gsl/tree/rawhide
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
users m
Yes,
How to I extract the .tgz (or the .spec) file from a src.rpm ?
>
> On 2021-06-19 2:35 p.m., Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > This what I have done.
> >
> > extrated the gsl.spec from gsl-2.7.tgz
> > edited it to set the version (2.7)
> > run rpmbuild -bb gsl.spec
> > It started to work, but finally
On 2021-06-19 2:35 p.m., Patrick Dupre wrote:
This what I have done.
extrated the gsl.spec from gsl-2.7.tgz
edited it to set the version (2.7)
run rpmbuild -bb gsl.spec
It started to work, but finally stop with
* Examples:
* - to ignore standard and empty RPATHs, execute 'rpmbuild' like
* $ QA
ib64' in [/usr/lib64]
ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/gsl-randist' contains a standard rpath
'/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rVEtxu (%install)
> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2021 at 11:35 PM
> From: "Patrick Dupre"
> T
(%install)
> >
> > https://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/gsl-latest.tgz (gsl-2.7)
> >
> >
> >> I thought that fedpkg works with a clone of the git repo for a fedora
> >> package.
> >> Is that what you are doing?
>
> That isn't going to work
On 2021-06-19 2:00 p.m., Patrick Dupre wrote:
I do not think so.
I downloaded
https://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/gsl-latest.tgz (gsl-2.7)
I thought that fedpkg works with a clone of the git repo for a fedora package.
Is that what you are doing?
That isn't going to work. You need the
I do not think so.
I downloaded
https://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/gsl-latest.tgz (gsl-2.7)
> I thought that fedpkg works with a clone of the git repo for a fedora package.
> Is that what you are doing?
>
> Barry
>
> > On 19 Jun 2021, at 15:35, Patrick Dupre w
I thought that fedpkg works with a clone of the git repo for a fedora package.
Is that what you are doing?
Barry
> On 19 Jun 2021, at 15:35, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Trying to build a rpm package for gsl.2.7
> I downloaded gsl-2.7.tar.gz
> I copy
> cp
Actually, now I have:
fedpkg --release fc34 local
sources file doesn't exist. Source files download skipped.
Could not execute local: Could not find the release/dist from branch name fc34
Please specify with --release
using gsl.spec.in (gsl-2.7.tar.gz)
Name: gsl
Summary: GNU Scientific Li
python3-pycurl-7.43.0.6-5.fc34.x86_64
libcurl-7.76.1-4.fc34.x86_64
libcurl-7.76.1-4.fc34.i686
>
> On 2021-06-19 7:34 a.m., Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > import pycurl
> > ImportError: pycurl: libcurl link-time version (7.64.1) is older than
> > compile-time version (7.75.0)
>
> Do you have a self
On 2021-06-19 7:34 a.m., Patrick Dupre wrote:
import pycurl
ImportError: pycurl: libcurl link-time version (7.64.1) is older than
compile-time version (7.75.0)
Do you have a self-installed version of pycurl or libcurl somewhere?
What does "rpm -q python3-pycurl libcurl" show?
___
Hello,
Trying to build a rpm package for gsl.2.7
I downloaded gsl-2.7.tar.gz
I copy
cp -a gsl.spec.in gsl.spec
and
run (in gsl-2.7)
fedpkg --release fc34 local
but I get
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 33, in
sys.exit(load_entry_point(&#x
On 4 November 2016 at 08:34, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:19 AM arnaud gaboury
> wrote:
>>
>> I am writing a spec file to build an app.
>> The build failed with this error:
>>
>> *** ERROR: No build ID note found in
>> /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mattermost-3.4-1.fc24
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:19 AM arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> I am writing a spec file to build an app.
> The build failed with this error:
>
> *** ERROR: No build ID note found in
> /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mattermost-3.4-1.fc24.x86_64/usr/share/webapps/mattermost/bin/platform
>
> Googling it,
I am writing a spec file to build an app.
The build failed with this error:
*** ERROR: No build ID note found in
/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mattermost-3.4-1.fc24.x86_64/usr/share/webapps/mattermost/bin/platform
Googling it, I found a few "tricks" which I tried but don't work:
- Adding "LDFL
On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:46:10 +
James Hogarth wrote:
> The templates, macros and Fedora Guidelines documentation do make it a
> lot cleaner and simpler than it was 5-10 years back though...
>
> This was something I wrote about building RPMs that should be
> applicable - and never forget it's a
On 11/02/2016 10:46 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
On 2 November 2016 at 16:37, jd1008 wrote:
On 11/02/2016 10:08 AM, stan wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2016 10:00:13 +
arnaud gaboury wrote:
I am writing a .spec file to build my own .rpm.
Here it is, non completed:
[snip]
RPM build errors:
On 2 November 2016 at 16:37, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 11/02/2016 10:08 AM, stan wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 02 Nov 2016 10:00:13 +
>> arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>
>>> I am writing a .spec file to build my own .rpm.
>>> Here it is, non completed:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> RPM build errors:
>>> Empty %files
On 11/02/2016 10:08 AM, stan wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2016 10:00:13 +
arnaud gaboury wrote:
I am writing a .spec file to build my own .rpm.
Here it is, non completed:
[snip]
RPM build errors:
Empty %files file
/home/makerpm/build_package/mattermost/platform-master/debugfiles.list
Co
On Wed, 02 Nov 2016 10:00:13 +
arnaud gaboury wrote:
> I am writing a .spec file to build my own .rpm.
> Here it is, non completed:
[snip]
> RPM build errors:
> Empty %files file
> /home/makerpm/build_package/mattermost/platform-master/debugfiles.list
> Could not execute local: Non zero
BUILD_NUMBER=%{version}-%{release} make %{?_smp_mflags}
package
%install
%files
%changelog
-
Before going further, I want to test, so run:
$ fedpkg --dist f24 local
Everything went fine and was left with the wanted binaries, BUT I have this
error at th
22 matches
Mail list logo
