-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 14/06/2013 13:29, Reindl Harald a écrit :
>> However it has been told that FastCGI provide also a performance
>> increase so, we would like to reach it also :)
Faster than CGI, probably, but nearly nobody use CGI nowadays ;)
>
Am 14.06.2013 14:33, schrieb Rafnews:
> i'm trying to create at home a webserver for testing purposes, having the
> same behavior as webhosting companies offers. the purpose behind that it's
> to have a representative environment when testing to not have particular
> "surprises" with web appli
count. while searching on internet i
>>> discovered
>>> that fastCGI should allow me (using my fedora user account) to do such
>>> thing, even
>>> if files/folders are owned by apache user account
>> this has *nothing* to with mod_php oder fastcgi
>>
Am 14.06.2013 12:35, schrieb Rafnews:
> however using my standard fedora user account, Ii still can not
> edit/remove/move
> files/folders owned by apache user account. while searching on internet i
> discovered
> that fastCGI should allow me (using my fedora user account) t
. while searching on
internet i discovered
that fastCGI should allow me (using my fedora user account) to do
such thing, even
if files/folders are owned by apache user account
this has *nothing* to with mod_php oder fastcgi
the permissions are how they are
* man setfacl
* man chown
* man chgrp
fastCGI should allow me (using my fedora user account) to do
such thing, even
if files/folders are owned by apache user account
this has *nothing* to with mod_php oder fastcgi
the permissions are how they are
* man setfacl
* man chown
* man chgrp
* man chmod
and by the way - the apache user should
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:20:16AM +0930, Tim wrote:
> I'm not familiar with FastCGI, but just looking quickly at it, it looks
> like a replacement program so that *it* runs your CGI instead of Apache
> doing it. I don't know if that's a real advantage, or just a perce
hat everyone else is allowed to do with the files, everyone
else being whoever is not the individual-owner or the group-owner.
These are the permissions that let apache read *your* files.
I'm not familiar with FastCGI, but just looking quickly at it, it looks
like a replacement program so tha
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 03:07:16PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
> > for now, all files/folders have correct permissions but owner is
> > apache:apache
> Once again : apache don't need to "own" the files, only to be able to
> read them.
And in fact, letting apache write to files it doesn't need to is
Le 14/06/2013 14:33, Rafnews a écrit :
> Situation:
> i installed on Fedora 18 a webserver where i need:
> - FastCGI
> - to use my standard fedora user account (let's say "rafnews") to
> edit/move/delete files/folder in my webroot /var/www/html folders, where
>
searching on internet i
discovered
that fastCGI should allow me (using my fedora user account) to do such thing,
even
if files/folders are owned by apache user account
this has *nothing* to with mod_php oder fastcgi
the permissions are how they are
* man setfacl
* man chown
* man chgrp
* man
On 14.06.2013 13:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.06.2013 12:35, schrieb Rafnews:
however using my standard fedora user account, Ii still can not edit/remove/move
files/folders owned by apache user account. while searching on internet i
discovered
that fastCGI should allow me (using my fedora
Hi,
i have a webserver (apache 2.4/php5/mysql 5.6) and i want to be sure it
is setup to use FastCGI.
when i execute phpinfo(); i can see (in loaded modules):
[CODE]
mod_proxy_fcgi
mod_proxy_scgi
mod_cgi
mod_php5
[/CODE]
however using my standard fedora user account, Ii still can not
edit
13 matches
Mail list logo
