Re: f16 x86_64 :: iptraf-ng

2012-02-24 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:22:38 +0200, AS (Adrian) wrote: > On 02/23/12 23:47, Rick Stevens wrote: > > On 02/23/2012 01:44 PM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: > >> Does anyone have an working iptraf? > >> I have the latest version from updates and it crashes .. i got from gdb > >> the following backtrace : >

Re: f16 x86_64 :: iptraf-ng

2012-02-24 Thread Adrian Sevcenco
On 02/23/12 23:47, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 02/23/2012 01:44 PM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: >> Does anyone have an working iptraf? >> I have the latest version from updates and it crashes .. i got from gdb >> the following backtrace : >> >> (gdb) bt >> #0 0x003e96836285 in __GI_raise (sig=6) at >>

Re: f16 x86_64 :: iptraf-ng

2012-02-23 Thread Rick Stevens
On 02/23/2012 01:44 PM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: Does anyone have an working iptraf? I have the latest version from updates and it crashes .. i got from gdb the following backtrace : (gdb) bt #0 0x003e96836285 in __GI_raise (sig=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64 #1 0x003e9

f16 x86_64 :: iptraf-ng

2012-02-23 Thread Adrian Sevcenco
Does anyone have an working iptraf? I have the latest version from updates and it crashes .. i got from gdb the following backtrace : (gdb) bt #0 0x003e96836285 in __GI_raise (sig=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64 #1 0x003e96837b9b in __GI_abort () at abort.c:91 #2 0x