Hi!
I have upgraded from F39 to F40 and my gnome shell extensions stopped working.
e.g.
$ gnome-extensions list | grep dock
dash-to-d...@micxgx.gmail.com
$ gnome-extensions enable dash-to-d...@micxgx.gmail.com
$ gnome-extensions list --enabled
returns nothing.
Any hints? I have some deja vu
>
> On 07/12/2021 17:52, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > I found the way to reactive my extension.
> > Sorry for the noise.
>
> Does this mean your "gnome environment" issue is resolved?
Yes.
I do not know haw it has been deactivated.
>
> --
> Did 황준호 die?
> __
On 07/12/2021 17:52, Patrick Dupre wrote:
I found the way to reactive my extension.
Sorry for the noise.
Does this mean your "gnome environment" issue is resolved?
--
Did 황준호 die?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)380395988| | Room# D114A
===
> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2021 at 10:48 AM
> From: "Patrick Dupre"
> To: "fedora"
> Sub
Hello
Using Tweaks, I do not have the tab Extension
How can I have it back?
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne
9 Avenue Alain Sava
On Mon, 07 Dec 2020 00:23:52 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 12/6/20 10:32 PM, Amadeus WM via users wrote:
>> Prior to Fedora 33 I would install gnome shell extensions from the
>> stock software manager. Under Categories -> Add-ons, there was an
>> Extensions tab, but ther
On 12/6/20 10:32 PM, Amadeus WM via users wrote:
Prior to Fedora 33 I would install gnome shell extensions from the stock
software manager. Under Categories -> Add-ons, there was an Extensions
tab, but there doesn't seem to be one anymore in F33.
Possibly that has been split out now.
Prior to Fedora 33 I would install gnome shell extensions from the stock
software manager. Under Categories -> Add-ons, there was an Extensions
tab, but there doesn't seem to be one anymore in F33.
Is the web browser the only way to install extensions now? And why do
gnome extens
On 5/4/20 10:44 AM, Tim Evans wrote:
The drop-down gnome shell menu in F32 (upper right hand corner of the
desktop) has a new "Extensions" panel now. It's very prominent, with an
extra large @-like icon.
Unfortunately, it does nothing other than change from black to blue whe
On 5/4/20 11:54 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 8:45 AM Tim Evans <mailto:tkev...@tkevans.com>> wrote:
The drop-down gnome shell menu in F32 (upper right hand corner of the
desktop) has a new "Extensions" panel now. It's very prominent,
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 8:45 AM Tim Evans wrote:
> The drop-down gnome shell menu in F32 (upper right hand corner of the
> desktop) has a new "Extensions" panel now. It's very prominent, with an
> extra large @-like icon.
>
I do not see this on my freshly-upgraded-to
The drop-down gnome shell menu in F32 (upper right hand corner of the
desktop) has a new "Extensions" panel now. It's very prominent, with an
extra large @-like icon.
Unfortunately, it does nothing other than change from black to blue when
clicked. Is it supposed to do
you were all heared:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1263621
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/c
ww.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/66.0.4/releasenotes/
Rikke -- long time Fedora user (from Redhat 4.2 or so in the 1990's) and
lurker
On 5/5/19 10:13 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 5/3/19 8:22 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Just an FYI for everyone. After wondering why all my extensions
sud
On 5/3/19 8:22 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Just an FYI for everyone. After wondering why all my extensions suddenly
migrated to the bit bucket in sky, after some digging, searching,
browsing, and tweeting, it's a known issue:
https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/certificate-issue-causing-add-o
emberresing “
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>
for Windows 10
*From: *Ulf Volmer <mailto:u.vol...@u-v.de>
*Sent: *Sunday, May 5, 2019 12:50 PM
*To: *users@lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
*
On Sun, 5 May 2019 12:27:26 +0200
François Patte wrote:
> Le 04/05/2019 à 13:07, Heinz Diehl a écrit :
> > On 04.05.2019, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> >
> >> Basically, an "all your extensions are belong to us" situation.
> >
/redhat… just to tell is not Linux - “exlusive – well this is
> emberresing “
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
> Windows 10
>
>
>
> *From: *Ulf Volmer
> *Sent: *Sunday, May 5, 2019 12:50 PM
> *To: *users@lists.fedo
2019-05-05 15:48 GMT+02:00, Sam Varshavchik :
> Important: set yourself a calendar reminder, oh, a week from now to turn
> both options back on. I'm just guessing that this dumpster fire will get
> sorted out before then, and you want to reenable it.
The first link you sent
https://discourse.moz
Ulf Volmer writes:
On 05.05.19 12:27, François Patte wrote:
> Le 04/05/2019 à 13:07, Heinz Diehl a écrit :
>> On 04.05.2019, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>
>>> Basically, an "all your extensions are belong to us" situation.
>>
>> You can enter about:con
@u-v.de>
Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2019 12:50 PM
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org<mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: PSA: All Firefox extensions are getting disabled, one by one
On 05.05.19 12:27, François Patte wrote:
> Le 04/05/2019 à 13:07, Heinz Diehl a écrit :
>>
On 05.05.19 12:27, François Patte wrote:
> Le 04/05/2019 à 13:07, Heinz Diehl a écrit :
>> On 04.05.2019, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>
>>> Basically, an "all your extensions are belong to us" situation.
>>
>> You can enter about:config and set "xpi
Le 04/05/2019 à 13:07, Heinz Diehl a écrit :
> On 04.05.2019, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
>> Basically, an "all your extensions are belong to us" situation.
>
> You can enter about:config and set "xpinstall.signatures.required" to
> "false" u
Overnight, my extensions were all re-enabled without my doing anything. The
mitigation announced on the blog apparently worked.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, 04 May 2019 10:08:57 -0400
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Heinz Diehl writes:
>
> > On 04.05.2019, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> >
> > > Basically, an "all your extensions are belong to us" situation.
> >
> > You can enter about:config and
Sam Varshavchik writes:
I am surprised that it actually worked. From what I read, I thought that
this option gets ignored in the version of Firefox that all the hoi-polloi
use, and it's enabled only in the dev/nightly Firefox builds.
This just went up: https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/0
Heinz Diehl writes:
On 04.05.2019, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Basically, an "all your extensions are belong to us" situation.
You can enter about:config and set "xpinstall.signatures.required" to
"false" until the problem is fixed.
I am surprised that it act
On 04.05.2019, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Basically, an "all your extensions are belong to us" situation.
You can enter about:config and set "xpinstall.signatures.required" to
"false" until the problem is fixed.
__
Most of my extensions have been disabled. However, the three that I have
installed as Fedora packages (mozilla-https-everywhere, mozilla-ublock-origin,
mozilla-noscript) are still enabled.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Also being tracked here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1548973
Warning: Bugs are being marked as dupes of that bug every few minutes, so might
be better to just bookmark the bug instead of following it.
___
users mailing list -- users@list
Just an FYI for everyone. After wondering why all my extensions suddenly
migrated to the bit bucket in sky, after some digging, searching, browsing,
and tweeting, it's a known issue:
https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/certificate-issue-causing-add-ons-to-be-
disabled-or-fail-to-install/
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Stephen Morris
wrote:
> On 25/10/16 16:27, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>
>> On 10/24/2016 06:12 PM, Alex wrote:
>>>
>>> Another issue relates to gnome-tweak-tool and GNOME extensions.
>>>
>>> When the system is
On 25/10/16 16:27, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/24/2016 06:12 PM, Alex wrote:
Another issue relates to gnome-tweak-tool and GNOME extensions.
When the system is idle for a few minutes, the screensaver is enabled
and a password is required to unlock it. I used gnome-tweak-tool in
the past to
On 10/24/2016 06:12 PM, Alex wrote:
Another issue relates to gnome-tweak-tool and GNOME extensions.
When the system is idle for a few minutes, the screensaver is enabled
and a password is required to unlock it. I used gnome-tweak-tool in
the past to disable this, but it's been enabled
es, but haven't followed GNOME and font
development.
Another issue relates to gnome-tweak-tool and GNOME extensions.
When the system is idle for a few minutes, the screensaver is enabled
and a password is required to unlock it. I used gnome-tweak-tool in
the past to disable this, but it&
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 03:37:11PM -0500, Alex wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone know of a GNOME extension (fedora23 desktop) to control
> the date/time in the top menubar thing to change it to 12-hr time
> instead of 24-hr? Is an extension even necessary for that, or am I
> missing some other abi
autologin? I'd like to save my
password and have it login automatically, since it's only my desktop
with no other users.
Any other extensions you think are really useful you might recommend?
Thanks,
Alex
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscripti
Is there a problem getting gnome extensions in F22? I can't seem to be
able to download any extras neither from gnome-tweak-tool nor directly
from the gnome site (https://extensions.gnome.org). Moreover, in both
cases I'm being prompted to unlock the default keyring. What keyring? I
Hello,
I'm just enjoying latest cinnamon desktop on my Fedora 20
I see this web site
http://cinnamon-spices.linuxmint.com/
are these provided also in rpm based format in some way/repo, in
particular for extensions?
At first sight on my Fedora 20 desktop a search for packages gives only:
cin
On 01/06/2014 08:11 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
After I update from 19 to 20, I lost all my gnome extensions.
How can I have them back?
Use the tweak tool to get to gnome extensions and select those available
for gnome 3.10 that you want.
I miss the CPU temp widget I had back in f17
Hello,
After I update from 19 to 20, I lost all my gnome extensions.
How can I have them back?
Thank.
Happy new year.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico
On 16 September 2013 13:41, Tim wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-09-15 at 10:32 -0400, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
>> Hey Tim, since you've been here on the list for years, I'm wondering:
>> What DE are you running? Did you move to GNOME Shell?
>
> I want the traditional, organised, menus. Not screens of icons.
before
I reach my veridict. I'll give it a try even though I feel like I'm
cheating (since I'm using two GNOME 2ish extensions). Now I'm
wondering how many people are using a GNOME 3 that resembles a GNOME 2
--
Jorge
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.
On 09/16/2013 03:01 AM, Ron Yorston wrote:
> I'm the author of the Frippery extensions. The Bottom Panel should work
> with GNOME 3.8, though not in Classic mode. If it's not working for you
> I'd like to find out why.
I went back to non Classic Mode - which I never use
On 09/16/2013 10:30 AM, Dan Thurman wrote:
I do not like the Gnome-3 desktop metaphor. I still have F13, waiting
for a Gnome-2 desktop for the latest Fedora release and so far, I am
checking out F18 with MATE. It seems to work for the most part, but
there are some issues/apps that I hope will be
Am 16.09.2013 19:30, schrieb Dan Thurman:
> I do not like the Gnome-3 desktop metaphor. I still have F13, waiting
> for a Gnome-2 desktop for the latest Fedora release and so far, I am
> checking out F18 with MATE. It seems to work for the most part, but
> there are some issues/apps that I hope w
On 09/16/2013 05:41 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2013-09-15 at 10:32 -0400, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
Hey Tim, since you've been here on the list for years, I'm wondering:
What DE are you running? Did you move to GNOME Shell?
I do not like the 3.0 desktop, I find the way it expects us to use it
annoying
On Sun, 2013-09-15 at 10:32 -0400, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> Hey Tim, since you've been here on the list for years, I'm wondering:
> What DE are you running? Did you move to GNOME Shell?
I do not like the 3.0 desktop, I find the way it expects us to use it
annoying, tedious, and unergonomic. None
On 09/16/2013 03:01 AM, Ron Yorston wrote:
> I'm the author of the Frippery extensions. The Bottom Panel should work
> with GNOME 3.8, though not in Classic mode. If it's not working for you
> I'd like to find out why.
Hi Ron,
Indeed, I'm using Classic Mode. I gues
Jorge Fábregas wrote:
>Thanks for the reminder Tim. It helps but I stll can't find it. It
>seems the "Frippery Bottom Panel" extension would do it but it doesn't
>work with GNOME 3.8.
I'm the author of the Frippery extensions. The Bottom Panel should work
wit
On 09/14/2013 10:39 PM, Tim wrote:
> Which was the "workspace switcher." Does having the name help you find
> a modern replacement?
Thanks for the reminder Tim. It helps but I stll can't find it. It
seems the "Frippery Bottom Panel" extension would do it but it doesn't
work with GNOME 3.8.
Hey
Allegedly, on or about 14 September 2013, Jorge Fábregas sent:
> - a workspace extension so that I could see all the workspaces on the
> bottom right hand. Right now, with the classic session, I have to
> click twice: activate pop-up & then choose the desired workspace.
> Again, I'm looking some
On 09/14/2013 09:06 PM, "Germán A. Racca" wrote:
> Take a look at this extension:
> https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/721/gnome-shell-open-terminal/
Thank you Germán. I just posted how I solved that particular one but I'm
glad to know there was also an extension for that!
Best regards,
Jorge
oking something like the old days.
I searched the extensions website but can't find any for these.
Thanks,
Jorge
--
Germán A. Racca
Fedora Package Maintainer
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Skytux
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or c
On 09/14/2013 10:38 AM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> - add "Open in Terminal" when you right-click on the desktop (like GNOME
> 2 used to)
Found it:
yum install nautilus-open-terminal
That works when browsing folders within Nautilus as well as right-click
on the Desktop.
--
Jorge
--
users mailing
On 14.09.2013 20:04, Xinyun Zhou wrote:
…
> or use Gnome in a mode and learn to think in the new Gnome 3 way. There
…
Actually there is nothing new under the sun.
If you follow the design, you'll get it.
What Jorge is seeking are an extension for an extension. :)
Oh dear.
poma
--
users mailin
On 14.09.2013 19:43, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> I did install MATE (just to try it) and loved it (felt incredibly like
> home) but I don't want to live in the past forever :) I want to give
> GNOME 3 a try, albeit with the Classic Mode (just as a transition),
> hoping GNOME Shell gets better because
On Sat, 2013-09-14 at 13:43 -0400, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> On 09/14/2013 01:31 PM, Xinyun Zhou wrote:
> I did install MATE (just to try it) and loved it (felt incredibly like
> home) but I don't want to live in the past forever :) I want to give
> GNOME 3 a try, albeit with the Classic Mode (just
On 09/14/2013 01:31 PM, Xinyun Zhou wrote:
> Well, if you are looking for something like the old days, why don't just
> use gnome 2 based desktops like MATE, which may save you a lot of time
> to find the features you want and make them work.
I did install MATE (just to try it) and loved it (felt
> - a workspace extension so that I could see all the workspaces on the
> bottom right hand. Right now, with the classic session, I have to click
> twice: activate pop-up & then choose the desired workspace. Again,
> I'm looking something like the old days.
>
> I sea
Right now, with the classic session, I have to click
twice: activate pop-up & then choose the desired workspace. Again,
I'm looking something like the old days.
I searched the extensions website but can't find any for these.
Thanks,
Jorge
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapro
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
>
> I note that the website (https://extensions.gnome.org/about/) says:
>
> and it also says,
"If you have checked all of these solutions and are still having trouble
installing extensions, please file a bug report using the l
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Do you really think I don't understand the difference? What I was hinting
> at is that GNOME extensions site uses a Firefox extension to be functional.
>
>
I note that the website (https://extensions.gnome.org/abou
hi
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram writes:
>
>>
>>
>> You should be using Firefox. Are you?
>>
>
> That would be a great way to get Firefox extension, certainly, but not
> Gnome extensions.
>
Do you real
Rahul Sundaram writes:
« HTML content follows »
Hi
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Wilfredo Porta
<mailto:wpo...@gmail.com>wpo...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all, I can't install gnome shell extensions via
http://extensions.gnome.org>extensions.gnome.org.
I have
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Wilfredo Porta wrote:
>>
>> Hi all, I can't install gnome shell extensions via extensions.gnome.org.
>>
>> I have upgrade my system since F12 all the way through F17.
>>
>> I
Hi
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Wilfredo Porta wrote:
> Hi all, I can't install gnome shell extensions via extensions.gnome.org.
>
> I have upgrade my system since F12 all the way through F17.
>
> I do get the message when trying to install an extensions, I agree b
On 01/04/2013 03:26 PM, Gabriel VLASIU wrote:
[snip]
I also use network.
$ grep IPV6_PRIVACY=rfc3041 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/*
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:IPV6_PRIVACY=rfc3041
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0:IPV6_PRIVACY=rfc3041
$ ip -6 a s eth0
2: eth0: mtu 150
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013, Patrick Lists wrote:
> >
> > Add:
> >
> > IPV6_PRIVACY=rfc3041
> >
> > to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-nicN
> >
> > Restart the network service (I never tested this with NetworkManager).
>
> Thank you for your suggestion
address of the nic. I don't like that and want to enable privacy extensions
which should replace the MAC address with some random stuff in the IPv6
address.
I added the following to /etc/sysctl.d/ipv6_privacy_extensions and rebooted:
net.ipv6.conf.default.use_tempaddr = 1
net
nt to enable
privacy extensions which should replace the MAC address with some random
stuff in the IPv6 address.
I added the following to /etc/sysctl.d/ipv6_privacy_extensions and
rebooted:
net.ipv6.conf.default.use_tempaddr = 1
net.ipv6.conf.default.temp_prefered_lft = 7200
Unfortunately this doe
On 01/04/2013 08:59 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 01/04/2013 12:30 AM, Patrick Lists wrote:
Anyone know how to make this work?
Thanks to the hard work of the NetworkManager developers, this is
already enabled by default if you use NetworkManager. If not... you'll
have to resort to sysctl t
that and want to enable privacy extensions
> which should replace the MAC address with some random stuff in the IPv6
> address.
>
> I added the following to /etc/sysctl.d/ipv6_privacy_extensions and rebooted:
>
> net.ipv6.conf.default.use_tempaddr = 1
> net.ipv6.co
On 01/04/2013 12:30 AM, Patrick Lists wrote:
Anyone know how to make this work?
Thanks to the hard work of the NetworkManager developers, this is
already enabled by default if you use NetworkManager. If not... you'll
have to resort to sysctl tweaks.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapr
On 1/4/2013 1:30, Patrick Lists wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On an up-to-date F17 x86_64 box I was testing IPv6 and it was pointed
> out that the IPv6 address that Fedora uses is traceable because it ends
> in the MAC address of the nic. I don't like that and want to enable
> p
Hi all,
On an up-to-date F17 x86_64 box I was testing IPv6 and it was pointed
out that the IPv6 address that Fedora uses is traceable because it ends
in the MAC address of the nic. I don't like that and want to enable
privacy extensions which should replace the MAC address with some r
16 x86_64
>> 3) Fedora 17 x86_64
>> All forced fallback mode ON
>
> Do you mean that you aren't using gnome-shell but classical
fallback
> mode? If the answer is yes, how can you speak about "extensions"?
> Those are for gnome-shell!
I run Forced Fallback M
Patrick Dupre writes:
Thus, I do not know how to debug the issues.
Would you help?
You will probably find that it will be much less work to simply run "yum
groupinstall xfce", and end up with a useful desktop.
pgpsB1orJVrkd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
users mailing list
users@list
shell but classical fallback
mode? If the answer is yes, how can you speak about "extensions"?
Those are for gnome-shell!
I run Forced Fallback Mode ON on the 3 machines, and on one I get the
gnome extensions!
This only means that you are confused, because as I said before
extensio
> >> 3) Fedora 17 x86_64
> >> All forced fallback mode ON
> >
> > Do you mean that you aren't using gnome-shell but classical fallback
> > mode? If the answer is yes, how can you speak about "extensions"?
> > Those are for gnome-shell!
>
>
On 08/02/2012 01:31 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
I had to face too many issues with the graphic modes in the past (even
recently).
That way, I am at least certain to start a text session properly.
I do not think that it has something to do with the issue.
Probably not, but it's best to be sure.
On 2012-08-02 22:23, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 08/02/2012 12:48 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
However, I run gnome by loading startx (on all machine) and after I
make
a Atl F2, if I try to run "r", I get an error message
because there are no "r" or "lg" application.
Do you have another option to get the gn
On 08/02/2012 12:48 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
However, I run gnome by loading startx (on all machine) and after I make
a Atl F2, if I try to run "r", I get an error message
because there are no "r" or "lg" application.
Do you have another option to get the gnome log file?
Why do you use startx i
er is yes, how can you speak about "extensions"?
Those are for gnome-shell!
I run Forced Fallback Mode ON on the 3 machines, and on one I get the
gnome extensions!
HTH,
Germán.
Only one 1) works fine regarding with the extensions
It means that I can "add to panel"
On 2012-08-02 22:00, Jack Craig wrote:
sounds like your desktop isnt working properly.
when i do alt-f2, i get a small box mid-screen where the cmd is
input. if your access to gnome shell doesnt work, id not expect
the rest of gnome extensions to work either.
OK, I can run "R", but
On 08/02/2012 04:16 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
I have 3 machines:
1) Fedora 16 i686
2) Fedora 16 x86_64
3) Fedora 17 x86_64
All forced fallback mode ON
Do you mean that you aren't using gnome-shell but classical fallback
mode? If the answer is yes, how can you speak about "
sounds like your desktop isnt working properly.
when i do alt-f2, i get a small box mid-screen where the cmd is
input. if your access to gnome shell doesnt work, i'd not expect
the rest of gnome extensions to work either.
is there a reason for your manual desktop startup? just curious...
O
64
All forced fallback mode ON
Only one 1) works fine regarding with the extensions
It means that I can "add to panel" and select
in a list of options starting with Character panel, Clock, CPU
Frequency Scaling Factor, ... ,System Monitor,
The 2 other ones, I just cannot do it, For
_64
> 3) Fedora 17 x86_64
> All forced fallback mode ON
>
> Only one 1) works fine regarding with the extensions
> It means that I can "add to panel" and select
> in a list of options starting with Character panel, Clock, CPU Frequency
> Scaling Factor, ... ,System Monit
Hello,
I have 3 machines:
1) Fedora 16 i686
2) Fedora 16 x86_64
3) Fedora 17 x86_64
All forced fallback mode ON
Only one 1) works fine regarding with the extensions
It means that I can "add to panel" and select
in a list of options starting with Character panel, Clock, CPU
Frequen
Hello,
I get the following message (fedora 16): could not list shell
extensions
Why?
Thank.
--
==
Patrick DUPRÉ| | email: pdu...@kegtux.org
Hello,
I cannot view the "gnome shell extensions" (gnome-tweak-tool) with
fedora 16.
ls .local/share/gnome-shell/extensions/media\@sotecware.net/
extension.js metadata.json
ls
.local/share/gnome-shell/extensions/system-monitor\@paradoxxx.zero.gmail.com/
extension.js metadata.json
On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 20:33 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:03:52PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > On 2012-07-20 21:51, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > >Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> > >>Any clues on how to debug this further?
> > >
> > >Press ALT+F2 and type "lg" into the run pr
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:03:52PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> On 2012-07-20 21:51, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> >>Any clues on how to debug this further?
> >
> >Press ALT+F2 and type "lg" into the run prompt. Look at the
> >"Errors" tab
> >for more clues.
>
> lg, I do n
On 07/21/2012 01:50 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
> #yum install lg
This is F17
root@f17 ~]# yum info lg
Loaded plugins: downloadonly, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
Error: No matching Packages to list
So, may you need to explain more where you got "lg" from and what "lg" is?
--
Never
#yum install LG
- sorry, Android tablet is not letting me
On Jul 20, 2012 1:04 PM, "Patrick Dupre" wrote:
>
> On 2012-07-20 21:51, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>
>> Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>>>
>>> Any clues on how to debug this further?
>>
>>
>> Press ALT+F2 and type "lg" into the run prompt. Look a
On 2012-07-20 21:51, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
Any clues on how to debug this further?
Press ALT+F2 and type "lg" into the run prompt. Look at the "Errors"
tab
for more clues.
lg, I do not have such a command!
--
=
Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> Any clues on how to debug this further?
Press ALT+F2 and type "lg" into the run prompt. Look at the "Errors" tab
for more clues.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
Couldn't find anything obvious (e.g. .xsession-errors) and I've managed
to install a couple of other extensions that are not currently
RPM-packaged in Fedora this way.
Any clues on how to debug this further?
Cheers,
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscri
Pasha R wrote:
> Is it possible to control placement of extensions in gnome panel?
Short answer: No.
Long answer:
If you want to get familiar with editing javascript and the Gnome
Extension design then sure you can change placement, but you really
aren't meant to change it.
--
users
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
