On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Gee...but nobody has mentioned the "name" of the list has been
> shortened. 47% fewer characters. :-)
One thing I did notice that *may* be more important is that Red Hat's
server was http*s* and fedoraproject's is http.
--
users mailing lis
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Tim wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've noticed a recent phenomenon where some people seem to be posting,
>> particularly replies, to this list twice over (more than I've noticed in
>> the past).
>>
>> They're posting to
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Tim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed a recent phenomenon where some people seem to be posting,
> particularly replies, to this list twice over (more than I've noticed in
> the past).
>
> They're posting to:
> *And* CCing to:
>
> I don't see any good reason why they
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Tim wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 22:37 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> Gee...but nobody has mentioned the "name" of the list has been
>> shortened. 47% fewer characters. :-)
>
It was noticed, just not mentioned..
Chris
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 22:37 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Gee...but nobody has mentioned the "name" of the list has been
> shortened. 47% fewer characters. :-)
I just put it down to "we won that war," and because it upsets some
people, "don't mention the war." ;-)
I've mentioned it twice, but I
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:42:39 -0500
William Case wrote:
> It will probably take a couple of weeks until *everyone* has their
> address book changed to the new address.
Another question might be: Is it a people doing this, or are there
news/mail gateways out there mailing to wrong address when peop
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 14:28 +, Martin Airs wrote:
> On 01/12/2010 02:19 PM, William Case wrote:
> >
> > It has happened to my posts. I have sent one response to people who are
> > still using the fedora-l...@redhat.com address and received back two
> > copies to my post with To:users@lists.f
Tim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed a recent phenomenon where some people seem to be posting,
> particularly replies, to this list twice over (more than I've noticed in
> the past).
>
> They're posting to:
> *And* CCing to:
>
> I don't see any good reason why they're doing this.
>
>
Gee...but n
On 01/12/2010 02:19 PM, William Case wrote:
>
> It has happened to my posts. I have sent one response to people who are
> still using the fedora-l...@redhat.com address and received back two
> copies to my post with To:users@lists.fedoraproject.org and
> Cc: fedora-l...@redhat.com
>
Oh I see,
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 19:56 +1030, Tim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed a recent phenomenon where some people seem to be posting,
> particularly replies, to this list twice over (more than I've noticed in
> the past).
>
> They're posting to:
> *And* CCing to:
>
> I don't see any good reason why
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 13:11 +, Martin Airs wrote:
> On 01/12/2010 09:26 AM, Tim wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've noticed a recent phenomenon where some people seem to be posting,
> > particularly replies, to this list twice over (more than I've noticed in
> > the past).
> >
> > They're posting to:
On 01/12/2010 09:26 AM, Tim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed a recent phenomenon where some people seem to be posting,
> particularly replies, to this list twice over (more than I've noticed in
> the past).
>
> They're posting to:
> *And* CCing to:
>
> I don't see any good reason why they're doi
Hi,
I've noticed a recent phenomenon where some people seem to be posting,
particularly replies, to this list twice over (more than I've noticed in
the past).
They're posting to:
*And* CCing to:
I don't see any good reason why they're doing this.
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.
13 matches
Mail list logo
