On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 3:53 PM Dave Close wrote:
> The basic issue seems to be that my Internet connection has become
> flaky. Provider alleges 45yo wiring is the problem. Tech visit is
> scheduled for Tuesday.
My mother's house was built in 1960. About 60 years later there were
problems
with
I wrote:
>The basic issue seems to be that my Internet connection has become
>flaky. Provider alleges 45yo wiring is the problem. Tech visit is
>scheduled for Tuesday.
Tech was here and things seem to be working well now. He said the issue
was the connectors on the cables, not the cables themselv
On 05/25/2025 12:52 PM, Dave Close wrote:
The basic issue seems to be that my Internet connection has become
flaky. Provider alleges 45yo wiring is the problem. Tech visit is
scheduled for Tuesday.
Speaking as a retired ISP support tech, they may well be right, and if
so, you'd better hope tha
Barry wrote:
>> communications error to 127.0.0.53#53: timed out
>
>Thatâs systemd-resolvedâs address. But you said you have your own
>resolv.conf.
>Check what you have enabled as services and resolv.conf.
You're right. That slipped in during my diagnostic effort. It is now
removed.
The bas
> On 25 May 2025, at 05:20, Dave Close wrote:
>
> communications error to 127.0.0.53#53: timed out
That’s systemd-resolved’s address. But you said you have your own resolv.conf.
Check what you have enabled as services and resolv.conf.
I have my own bind9 named running with systemd-resolved an
On Sat, 24 May 2025 21:19:40 -0700 Dave Close wrote:
> I run my own internal name server using my own resolv.conf.
> Everything has been running perfectly for years. Yesterday, my ISP
> changed my address and now things are flaky. I think I've found and
> changed all references to the old address
spmx2.googlemail.com.
ocregister.com mail is handled by 20 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com.
$ systemctl status named
named.service - Berkeley Internet Name Domain (DNS)
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/named.service; enabled; preset:
disabled
Drop-In: /usr/lib/systemd/system/service.d
Tim:
>> Or is it region-fenced? Allowing local (to it) usage, not world-
wide.
Mike Wright:
> Could be. But François is in France as is fdn.fr.
https://www.fdn.fr/renforcement-serveurs-dns-2025/
Auto-translation of that page comes up with this:
- be
On 4/23/25 22:39, Tim via users wrote:
On Wed, 2025-04-23 at 12:45 -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
That shows that there is some kind of server there and that it answers
on the standard dns ports. It just don't reply to any requests.
Or is it region-fenced? Allowing local (to it) usage, not
On Wed, 2025-04-23 at 12:45 -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
> That shows that there is some kind of server there and that it answers
> on the standard dns ports. It just don't reply to any requests.
Or is it region-fenced? Allowing local (to it) usage, not world-wide.
--
uname
Am 23.04.2025 um 19:26:53 Uhr schrieb François Patte:
> It is a public server:
>
> https://www.fdn.fr/actions/dns/ (sorry, in french
It doesn't work, I also tried the other addresses they listed.
I gave me an ICMPv6 prohibited, so their firewall is improperly
configured.
Contac
On 4/23/25 10:15, François Patte wrote:
Bonjour,
Bonjour,
I am wondering why some dns servers are available and some other are not
if I set them in resolv.conf (or other dns config files)?
The nameservers in resolv.conf will be tried.
And dig @80.67.169.12 sci-hub.se returns
Le 23/04/2025 à 19:19, Marco Moock a écrit :
Am 23.04.2025 um 19:15:45 Uhr schrieb François Patte:
I am wondering why some dns servers are available and some other are
not if I set them in resolv.conf (or other dns config files)?
Some might be public servers and other might be not accessible
Am 23.04.2025 um 19:15:45 Uhr schrieb François Patte:
> I am wondering why some dns servers are available and some other are
> not if I set them in resolv.conf (or other dns config files)?
Some might be public servers and other might be not accessible for the
public by design (UDP DNS
Bonjour,
I am wondering why some dns servers are available and some other are not
if I set them in resolv.conf (or other dns config files)?
For instance this can be seen using dig:
dig @8.8.8.8 sci-hub.se returns:
; <<>> DiG 9.18.28 <<>> @8.8.8.8 sci-hub.se
; (1
On Tue, 2024-07-23 at 14:31 +0200, François Patte wrote:
> I try to change the default dns configured by my ISP on a fedora 40.
>
> Once upon a time it was easy: just change the file /etc/resolv.conf
> now
And if you try the method we've been told to use for the last s
/supported
resolv.conf mode: stub
Current DNS Server: 80.67.169.40#ns1.fdn.fr
DNS Servers: 80.67.169.12#ns0.fdn.fr 2001:910:800::12#ns0.fdn.fr
80.67.169.40#ns1.fdn.fr
2001:910:800::40#ns1.fdn.fr
Link 2 (eno1)
Current Scopes: DNS LLMNR/IPv4 LLMNR/IPv6
On 7/23/24 7:31 AM, François Patte wrote:
Bonjour,
I try to change the default dns configured by my ISP on a fedora 40.
Once upon a time it was easy: just change the file /etc/resolv.conf
now
So, according to some information got from the internet, I created a
directory
/usr/lib
> On 23 Jul 2024, at 13:33, François Patte
> wrote:
> What did I miss?
Not sure.
But the output of
systemctl status systemd-resolved.service
resolvectl status
would be interesting to see.
Was systemd-resolved running? If its nit running then check for issues in your
.conf.
Barry
--
Bonjour,
I try to change the default dns configured by my ISP on a fedora 40.
Once upon a time it was easy: just change the file /etc/resolv.conf
now
So, according to some information got from the internet, I created a
directory
/usr/lib/systemd/resolved.conf.d/
then wrote a file
On Sun, 2024-01-28 at 08:12 +, Strahil Nikolov via users wrote:
> I do control the DHCP and the DNS servers in my network and I did
> manage to make the DHCP stop proposing 'domain-search' and yet
> NetworkManager (after OKD update and my interventions with
> /etc/resolv
> On 28 Jan 2024, at 10:32, Strahil Nikolov wrote:
>
> I haven't tested ignore-auto-dns but I will give it a try.
> With dhcp-client , the request to the server can be fully controlled (like
> ask for IP/mask, gate and dns servers only) and I was hoping it will help.
If y
I haven't tested ignore-auto-dns but I will give it a try.With dhcp-client ,
the request to the server can be fully controlled (like ask for IP/mask, gate
and dns servers only) and I was hoping it will help.
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 12:26, Barry Scott
> On 28 Jan 2024, at 10:08, Strahil Nikolov wrote:
>
> Hi Barrу,
>
> Until yesterday /etc/resolv.conf was managed by systemd-resolved and I tried
> the approach to ignore DNS settings from DHCP but no success.
> I tried setting ipv4.dns-search to empty via nmcli but /
Hi Barrу,
Until yesterday /etc/resolv.conf was managed by systemd-resolved and I tried
the approach to ignore DNS settings from DHCP but no success.I tried setting
ipv4.dns-search to empty via nmcli but /etc/resolv.conf still had the search
stanza.
Does anyone know if dhcp-client is renamed or
> On 27 Jan 2024, at 14:19, Strahil Nikolov via users
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking for some help to adjust systemd-resolved to still use DHCP (ip,
> gateway and dns servers) but to avoid using the dns search provided over DHCP.
>
> The reason behind is
Hi Tim,
Yes the bug report is inevitable, maybe even 2 (NetworkManager is under
suspicion too).
I do control the DHCP and the DNS servers in my network and I did manage to
make the DHCP stop proposing 'domain-search' and yet NetworkManager (after OKD
update and my interventions
; I even managed to make my DNS stop sending 'domain-search' (clearly
> visible in the NM connection) but NM still applies the domain as
> such.
>
> On top of that I can't find dhcp-client in the repo ,which could be a
> possible solution to replace NM built-in DH
Hi Jeffrey,
That's true but right now I have no control over OpenShift/OKD behavior.
I even managed to make my DNS stop sending 'domain-search' (clearly visible in
the NM connection) but NM still applies the domain as such.
On top of that I can't find dhcp-client in the re
On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 9:19 AM Strahil Nikolov via users
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking for some help to adjust systemd-resolved to still use DHCP (ip,
> gateway and dns servers) but to avoid using the dns search provided over DHCP.
>
> The reason behind is that O
Hi all,
I am looking for some help to adjust systemd-resolved to still use DHCP (ip,
gateway and dns servers) but to avoid using the dns search provided over DHCP.
The reason behind is that OKD4's coredns (Fedora CoreOS) appends the search
stanza (first entry) that is taken from the hos
> On 21 Dec 2023, at 19:03, John W. Himpel wrote:
>
>
>
> There is a Let's Encrypt plugin for digitalocean, but non for GoDaddy.
> Thus the need for a custom plugin.
I think this is so that you can use the DNS method of proving you control the
domain.
You can al
> On 21 Dec 2023, at 17:04, John W. Himpel wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I am a complete stranger to python.
>
> I am attempting to automate the certificate renewal process for several
> certificates obtained from Letsencrypt via certbot. My DNS is hosted
> at GoDadd
> On 21 Dec 2023, at 17:04, John W. Himpel wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I am a complete stranger to python.
>
> I am attempting to automate the certificate renewal process for several
> certificates obtained from Letsencrypt via certbot. My DNS is hosted
> at GoDadd
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 11:04:27 -0600
John W. Himpel wrote:
> What I don't know is where in the filesystem I should put the .py files
> so that certbot will find them and I don't have to reinstall everytime
> there's a python version upgrade.
Don't know. I always find the latest /usr/lib/python3*/si
On 12/21/23 09:04, John W. Himpel wrote:
All,
I am a complete stranger to python.
I am attempting to automate the certificate renewal process for several
certificates obtained from Letsencrypt via certbot. My DNS is hosted
at GoDaddy.com.
I found several projects on github that provide
All,
I am a complete stranger to python.
I am attempting to automate the certificate renewal process for several
certificates obtained from Letsencrypt via certbot. My DNS is hosted
at GoDaddy.com.
I found several projects on github that provide authenticators for
GoDaddy that reportedly work
On 4/23/23 19:48, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/23/23 19:38, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/23/23 19:34, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/23/23 19:17, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
How do I tell dhcp-client to use a DNS server of
my choosing and not what comes from the dhcp server?
You set it in the
On 4/23/23 19:38, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/23/23 19:34, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/23/23 19:17, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
How do I tell dhcp-client to use a DNS server of
my choosing and not what comes from the dhcp server?
You set it in the networkmanager connection config.
In
On 4/23/23 19:38, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/23/23 19:34, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/23/23 19:17, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
How do I tell dhcp-client to use a DNS server of
my choosing and not what comes from the dhcp server?
You set it in the networkmanager connection config.
In
On 4/23/23 19:34, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/23/23 19:17, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
How do I tell dhcp-client to use a DNS server of
my choosing and not what comes from the dhcp server?
You set it in the networkmanager connection config.
In the IPV4 section, turn off automatic DNS and enter
On 4/23/23 19:17, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
How do I tell dhcp-client to use a DNS server of
my choosing and not what comes from the dhcp server?
You set it in the networkmanager connection config.
In the IPV4 section, turn off automatic DNS and enter your DNS server
address
Hi All,
How do I tell dhcp-client to use a DNS server of
my choosing and not what comes from the dhcp server?
Many thanks,
-T
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 4/12/23 23:37, Tim via users wrote:
https://support.opendns.com/hc/en-us/articles/227986567-How-to-test-for-successful-OpenDNS-configuration-
Thank you!
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-
l as ensuring you've set your networking options up the way you
expected, browsers don't always work the way you expect them (they can
bypass ordinary DNS lookups in various ways).
Since you're using https://www.opendns.com/ as a filter, it has a set
of test instructions to check it&
know.
> $ ping xxx.com
> PING xxx.com (146.112.61.106) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from hit-adult.opendns.com (146.112.61.106): icmp_seq=1 ttl=58
> time=12.1 ms
>
>
> And that answered my question.
Since you got an IP to ping for that domain name, something did *not*
block
On 4/12/23 02:24, Petr Menšík wrote:
In general there is no final DNS you can obtain.
I realize that now.
I bust did a ping to a pron site and saw that
Family Friendly OpenDNS blocked it. So I am
happy.
___
users mailing list -- users
On 3/29/23 02:53, Tim via users wrote:
dig example.com
$ dig gbis.com
...
;; Query time: 71 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) (UDP)
Not real helpful. I think I will just ping a
porn site and see what happens.
$ ping xxx.com
PING xxx.com (146.112.61.106) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes
On 04/12/2023 03:39 AM, Petr Menšík wrote:
How would that work?
That may be so, but at least by using startpage.com you're not letting
them mine your search history as well.
Stop topposting!
Startpage anonomyzes queries before sending them off to Google, and
keeps no logs. All Google k
work arounds
by using VPN or at least encrypted DNS, but choosing trusted internet
provider should be always a start. Any workarounds typically just change
who would be able to watch your browsing.
On 3/30/23 04:26, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 03/29/2023 08:22 PM, Tim via users wrote:
Perhaps initially
final DNS you can obtain. The final DNS depends
on the name you query. There can be multiple layers of forwarders
chained behind themselves. I think the best bet would be processing what
connections offered as their name servers. nmcli without parameters
might help with that. But there is no
; to twiddle with BIND from the command line.
> Servers like bind, unbound or knot-resolver do not require forwarders
> to work. It may work just fine even without them.
They *should* always work fine without them, unless you have a peculiar
ISP which interferes with normal DNS functionalit
/etc/named.conf or named-checkconf -p output. Servers
like bind, unbound or knot-resolver do not require forwarders to work.
It may work just fine even without them.
The most universal way to obtain systemd dns servers is nmcli without
parameters. It would just show what NM provides. If dnsmasq
On 03/29/2023 08:22 PM, Tim via users wrote:
Perhaps initially, but if you're sent to a page with Google ads, you
check your gmail, you use your Android phone, or do any number of
ordinary internet activities, and you're identifiable.
That may be so, but at least by using startpage.com you're n
Tim:
>> Look at Google, it's goal is databasing everything. Tie a bunch of
>> queries to the same IP, roll it all together, it doesn't matter what
>> privacy options you attempt, which different browsers you use, or if
>> you remove cookies. If you don't want some queries in that database,
>> don
On 03/29/2023 04:22 AM, Tim via users wrote:
Look at Google, it's goal is databasing everything. Tie a bunch of
queries to the same IP, roll it all together, it doesn't matter what
privacy options you attempt, which different browsers you use, or if
you remove cookies. If you don't want some qu
On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 15:59 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> I was just wanting to see what DNS I was actually using.
>
> I have this in my /etc/naned/conf
>
> options {
> # the following forwarders is Family Friendly Open DNS (no porn
> sites):
On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 13:47 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> the ones that answered the queries that your name
> server asked of it
The general process for asking a real domain server for a domain name
like www.example.com is that it'd consult its records (*) to find a
root server, ask one o
On 3/28/23 14:31, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 03/28/2023 02:45 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
It is not showing my end DNS server or any
dns server at all. I tried substituting
other IP's including my own lan IP and my
WAN IP (which times out) and no DNS
shows up at all
I get the impression
On 3/28/23 16:39, Go Canes wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 7:00 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
I was just wanting to see what DNS I was actually using.
dig and nslookup both display the IP address of the DNS resolver that
you are querying. But if you are asking for which DNS resolver
On 3/28/23 16:39, Go Canes wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 7:00 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
I was just wanting to see what DNS I was actually using.
dig and nslookup both display the IP address of the DNS resolver that
you are querying. But if you are asking for which DNS resolver
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 7:00 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
> I was just wanting to see what DNS I was actually using.
dig and nslookup both display the IP address of the DNS resolver that
you are querying. But if you are asking for which DNS resolver
actually provided the answer, that wo
On 3/28/23 14:31, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 03/28/2023 02:45 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
It is not showing my end DNS server or any
dns server at all. I tried substituting
other IP's including my own lan IP and my
WAN IP (which times out) and no DNS
shows up at all
I get the impression
On 03/28/2023 02:45 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
It is not showing my end DNS server or any
dns server at all. I tried substituting
other IP's including my own lan IP and my
WAN IP (which times out) and no DNS
shows up at all
I get the impression that what you want is the machine
On 3/28/23 13:36, Barry wrote:
Cannot be done except by reading the config files.
That is what I thought. Thank you for the confirmation!
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedora
On 3/28/23 05:33, Tim via users wrote:
On Mon, 2023-03-27 at 23:09 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I was looking for a way I could look up the final DNS
server, regardless of was type of local server I was
going through. I don't think it is possible. It looks
like I should dig i
On 3/28/23 07:32, Mike Wright wrote:
On 3/28/23 05:01, Go Canes wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 2:10 AM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
I was looking for a way I could look up the final DNS
server, regardless of was type of local server I was
going through. I don't think it is possible
> On 28 Mar 2023, at 13:10, ToddAndMargo via users
> wrote:
>
> On 3/28/23 05:01, Go Canes wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 2:10 AM ToddAndMargo via users
>>> wrote:
>>> I was looking for a way I could look up the final DNS
>>> serv
On 3/28/23 05:01, Go Canes wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 2:10 AM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
I was looking for a way I could look up the final DNS
server, regardless of was type of local server I was
going through. I don't think it is possible. It looks
like I should dig it out from
On Mon, 2023-03-27 at 23:09 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> I was looking for a way I could look up the final DNS
> server, regardless of was type of local server I was
> going through. I don't think it is possible. It looks
> like I should dig it out from /etc/named.
start, your question is itself a bit
odd. DNS means Domain Name System, but we all presume you want to know
the address of your Domain Name Server.
When a device joins a network it is typical that a DHCP server assigns
it an addresses (numerical IP, hostname, domain name), and provides
some other
On 3/28/23 05:01, Go Canes wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 2:10 AM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
I was looking for a way I could look up the final DNS
server, regardless of was type of local server I was
going through. I don't think it is possible. It looks
like I should dig it out from
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 2:10 AM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
> I was looking for a way I could look up the final DNS
> server, regardless of was type of local server I was
> going through. I don't think it is possible. It looks
> like I should dig it out from /etc/named.
also not running sysyemd-resolved
>> Perhaps we should go back to the start, your question is itself a bit
>> odd. DNS means Domain Name System, but we all presume you want to know
>> the address of your Domain Name Server.
>> When a device joins a network it is typical that
On 3/27/23 21:22, Tim via users wrote:
Tim:
Are you on-line?
And did any of the other options work?
ToddAndMargo:
No. And I am also not running sysyemd-resolved
Perhaps we should go back to the start, your question is itself a bit
odd. DNS means Domain Name System, but we all presume
Tim:
>> Are you on-line?
>>
>> And did any of the other options work?
ToddAndMargo:
> No. And I am also not running sysyemd-resolved
Perhaps we should go back to the start, your question is itself a bit
odd. DNS means Domain Name System, but we all presume you want t
On 3/26/23 23:41, Tim via users wrote:
Tim:
"resolvectl status" on Fedora will answer that.
ToddAndMargo:
$ resolvectl status
Failed to get global data: The name is not activatable
Are you on-line?
And did any of the other options work?
No. And I am also not running sysyemd-resolved
_
On 3/26/23 22:44, Barry wrote:
On 27 Mar 2023, at 01:31, ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
On 3/26/23 16:33, Tim via users wrote:
"resolvectl status" on Fedora will answer that.
$ resolvectl status
Failed to get global data: The name is not activatable
Are you running sysyemd-resolved? If
Tim:
>> "resolvectl status" on Fedora will answer that.
ToddAndMargo:
> $ resolvectl status
> Failed to get global data: The name is not activatable
Are you on-line?
And did any of the other options work?
--
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.88.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Mar 7 15:41:52 UTC 2023 x86
> On 27 Mar 2023, at 01:31, ToddAndMargo via users
> wrote:
>
> On 3/26/23 16:33, Tim via users wrote:
>> "resolvectl status" on Fedora will answer that.
>
> $ resolvectl status
> Failed to get global data: The name is not activatable
Are you running sysyemd-resolved? If not the the failure
On 3/26/23 16:33, Tim via users wrote:
"resolvectl status" on Fedora will answer that.
$ resolvectl status
Failed to get global data: The name is not activatable
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to u
On 3/26/23 15:09, Slade Watkins via users wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 5:57 PM ToddAndMargo via users
mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
wrote:
I have a caching server running. Other than digging
out my "forward" from /etc/named.conf to figure out
what my D
On 3/26/23 15:07, Barry wrote:
On 26 Mar 2023, at 22:57, ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
Hi All,
Fedora 37
I have a caching server running. Other than digging
out my "forward" from /etc/named.conf to figure out
what my DNS server is, is there a way to use "dig"
or
On Sun, 2023-03-26 at 14:57 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> I have a caching server running. Other than digging
> out my "forward" from /etc/named.conf to figure out
> what my DNS server is, is there a way to use "dig"
> or other to figure out wha
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 5:57 PM ToddAndMargo via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> I have a caching server running. Other than digging
> out my "forward" from /etc/named.conf to figure out
> what my DNS server is, is there a way to use "dig&
> On 26 Mar 2023, at 22:57, ToddAndMargo via users
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Fedora 37
>
> I have a caching server running. Other than digging
> out my "forward" from /etc/named.conf to figure out
> what my DNS server is, is there a way to use "
Hi All,
Fedora 37
I have a caching server running. Other than digging
out my "forward" from /etc/named.conf to figure out
what my DNS server is, is there a way to use "dig"
or other to figure out what my actual DNS server
On 2/2/23 17:59, Mike Wright wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to use nmcli to set what would be the "search" option in
/etc/resolv.conf.
I found that NM was reconfiguring eth0 into dhcp and wiping my settings
in the process. Changing ipv4.method from auto (default) to manual
stopped that.
So fa
Hi all,
I'm trying to use nmcli to set what would be the "search" option in
/etc/resolv.conf.
Using nmcli to set the search domain
"nmcli con mod eth0 ipv4.dns-search main"
(.main is the local private TLD for historical reasons)
"nmcli con show eth0" an
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 3:00 AM Tim via users
wrote:
> Tim:
> >>> I keep meaning to change hosts, but finding someone else who actually
> >>> says they use Apache (in my country) and doesn't have the worst website
> >>> to navigate to look at features versus price, is a pain in the butt.
Here i
Tim:
>>> I keep meaning to change hosts, but finding someone else who actually
>>> says they use Apache (in my country) and doesn't have the worst website
>>> to navigate to look at features versus price, is a pain in the butt.
Barry:
>> I use digitalocean.com and run a “droplet”, 1GiB VM running
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 11:14 AM Barry wrote:
> > On 14 Dec 2022, at 15:49, Tim via users
> > wrote:
> > On Tue, 2022-12-13 at 16:11 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> >> I used to use bind, but it became impossible to configure when
> >> they started enforcing DNS
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 10:49 AM Tim via users
wrote:
>
> Likewise, I use Apache rather than some other half-baked HTTP server.
> Though, unfortunately, my hosting provider has decided they're now
> going to use LightSpeed, which isn't Apache-compatible in the areas
> that I want (not to mention i
> On 14 Dec 2022, at 15:49, Tim via users wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2022-12-13 at 16:11 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> I used to use bind, but it became impossible to configure when
>> they started enforcing DNS encryption,
>
>
>
> When did that happen? Mine i
On Tue, 2022-12-13 at 16:11 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I used to use bind, but it became impossible to configure when
> they started enforcing DNS encryption,
When did that happen? Mine isn't running that way, though I'm running
it on CentOS 7.
> switched to dnsmasq and
I have a server PC running 24/7, so I use it instead.
> >
> > Me too. I used to use bind, but it became impossible to configure when
> > they started enforcing DNS encryption, switched to dnsmasq and wondered
> > why I ever bothered to fool with bind :-). Dnsmasq gets names
On 12/13/22 13:11, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 07:16:43 +1030
Tim via users wrote:
I have a server PC running 24/7, so I use it instead.
Me too. I used to use bind, but it became impossible to configure when
they started enforcing DNS encryption, switched to dnsmasq and wondered
ged in two printers without mdns, how
are you going to tell which one is which?
Each printer gets a unique hostname. Then, you print using the
hostname. It does not matter which IP address the machine gets.
I guess the sharp edge in that design is, DHCP server must register
entries in DNS. That's
On 12/13/22 13:11, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 07:16:43 +1030
Tim via users wrote:
I have a server PC running 24/7, so I use it instead.
Me too. I used to use bind, but it became impossible to configure when
they started enforcing DNS encryption, switched to dnsmasq and wondered
On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 07:16:43 +1030
Tim via users wrote:
> I have a server PC running 24/7, so I use it instead.
Me too. I used to use bind, but it became impossible to configure when
they started enforcing DNS encryption, switched to dnsmasq and wondered
why I ever bothered to fool with b
1 - 100 of 894 matches
Mail list logo
