el Sieb"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: wrong disk size
>
> On 07/16/2017 07:53 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > My 500 Go disk has shrunk to 31.5 G!
>
> We really need more info than this. What is the device? What command
> are you running?
>
On 07/16/2017 07:53 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
My 500 Go disk has shrunk to 31.5 G!
We really need more info than this. What is the device? What command
are you running?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
On 07/16/2017 09:36 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
I have heard that there are flash drives on the market that report much
higher capacity than they really have. You can build a file system on
them and it all looks good; "df" and friends show the claimed capacity.
But as soon as you put enough data on t
I have heard that there are flash drives on the market that report much
higher capacity than they really have. You can build a file system on them
and it all looks good; "df" and friends show the claimed capacity. But as
soon as you put enough data on the drive to exceed the real capacity, your
dat
Hello,
My 500 Go disk has shrunk to 31.5 G!
Failed to read extended partition table (offset=196141056): Invalid argument
Disk /dev/sdc: 31.5 GiB, 33820284928 bytes, 66055244 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optim
Paul Smith writes:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Reindl Harald
> wrote:
>>> Does the size of the hard disk affect Fedora's performance?
>>>
>>> I am looking for a 2 T disk to replace my current disk, but some
>>> people are warning me about performance; they say I should buy a disk
>>> of
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:52:24AM +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> How can I see the total disk size of my hard disk?
>
> I have used the following command:
>
> # fdisk -l | grep Disk
> Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors
> Disk identifier: 0x0003dd
On 06/21/2013 04:16 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Does the size of the hard disk affect Fedora's performance?
>
> I am looking for a 2 T disk to replace my current disk, but some
> people are warning me about performance; they say I should buy a disk
> of at most 1 T. Are they correct?
>
Am 23.06.2013 14:50, schrieb Tim:
>> which has nothing to do with *a disk* larger than 1 TB
>> it's more depending on the partitions you create
>
> It has an awful lot to do with such large discs. What's the default
> partitioning for Windows? One partition that covers the entire drive
who ca
On 23.06.2013 15:24, Dave Ihnat wrote:
…
> Enough pre-coffee pontificating. …
Try again after the cafe break. :)
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fe
Ok, folks, I just want to inject some bit of reality here. I've started
working on Unix internals in 1980, and have worked ever since on just
about any OS that has come my way--almost all variants of Unix, Linux,
Windows, and a bunch of others that are irrelevant to this conversation.
Why do I say
Tim:
>> Have you seen Windows complain at boot up that you hadn't shut down
>> properly, and it needs to check the drive? (Of course you did shut
>> down properly, *it* screwed up doing so.) Then you have the fun of
>> waiting for it to scan through one hell of a huge drive. More so if
>> your c
Am 22.06.2013 14:18, schrieb Tim:
> Allegedly, on or about 21 June 2013, Paul Smith sent:
>> They are all MS Windows users, and they say that using
>> a disk larger than 1 T as a boot disk, the performance will be
>> affected. Maybe, that is true with MS Windows and not with Fedora.
>
> Have you
the next time please use a subject for your message!
Am 22.06.2013 12:52, schrieb Paul Smith:
> How can I see the total disk size of my hard disk?
>
> I have used the following command:
> # fdisk -l | grep Disk
> Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors
&g
Allegedly, on or about 21 June 2013, Paul Smith sent:
> They are all MS Windows users, and they say that using
> a disk larger than 1 T as a boot disk, the performance will be
> affected. Maybe, that is true with MS Windows and not with Fedora.
Well, there's this side of that situation:
Have you
Am 21.06.2013 23:16, schrieb Paul Smith:
> Does the size of the hard disk affect Fedora's performance?
>
> I am looking for a 2 T disk to replace my current disk, but some
> people are warning me about performance; they say I should buy a disk
> of at most 1 T. Are they correct?
these people are
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Does the size of the hard disk affect Fedora's performance?
>>
>> I am looking for a 2 T disk to replace my current disk, but some
>> people are warning me about performance; they say I should buy a disk
>> of at most 1 T. Are they correct?
Dear All,
Does the size of the hard disk affect Fedora's performance?
I am looking for a 2 T disk to replace my current disk, but some
people are warning me about performance; they say I should buy a disk
of at most 1 T. Are they correct?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
--
users mailing list
users@lis
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Tod Thomas wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 13:14 -0400, Tod Thomas wrote:
>> > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 08:02 -0700, Tod Tho
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 13:14 -0400, Tod Thomas wrote:
> > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 08:02 -0700, Tod Thomas wrote:
> > > > I've installed VirtualBox on a Win7 workstati
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 13:14 -0400, Tod Thomas wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 08:02 -0700, Tod Thomas wrote:
> > > I've installed VirtualBox on a Win7 workstation and established a
> > > running
> > > FC14 VM. Everything was fine
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 08:02 -0700, Tod Thomas wrote:
> > I've installed VirtualBox on a Win7 workstation and established a
> > running
> > FC14 VM. Everything was fine until I tried doing a yum upgrade and
> > then I
> > discovered my
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 08:02 -0700, Tod Thomas wrote:
> I've installed VirtualBox on a Win7 workstation and established a
> running
> FC14 VM. Everything was fine until I tried doing a yum upgrade and
> then I
> discovered my boot partition needed to be at least 7GB! to be able to
> perform the upg
erface and increased the virtual
disk size, but does anyone have any working hints on using the GParted iso
to increase the size of my VM boot partition?
Also, why didn't FC14 establish an adequately sized boot partition during
installation? Seems odd the default install would be setup to create a
24 matches
Mail list logo
