Re: device naming (mentioned in Fedora Weekly News 259)

2011-01-21 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 01/21/2011 11:35 AM, Tim wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 10:44 +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote: >> Well, on the other end it is very useful if your NIC is called eth0, >> because when it is not working well you can remove it from the slot, >> plug in a new one and restart the system with no configura

Re: device naming (mentioned in Fedora Weekly News 259)

2011-01-21 Thread Matt Domsch
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:44:49AM +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > If there is only one NIC, I want it to be eth0. By default, it will be called em1 or pci#. There is no way to know "there is only one NIC" at any point in time, as each device is discovered in parallel, and devices may be hot-added

Re: device naming (mentioned in Fedora Weekly News 259)

2011-01-21 Thread Tim
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 10:44 +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > Well, on the other end it is very useful if your NIC is called eth0, > because when it is not working well you can remove it from the slot, > plug in a new one and restart the system with no configuration change. Not quite. There's a few

Re: device naming (mentioned in Fedora Weekly News 259)

2011-01-21 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 01/21/2011 11:09 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 01/21/2011 03:14 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: >> >> Both approaches are needed, case by case. >> >> If there is only one NIC, I want it to be eth0. >> But I also like that some external disks appear with their own >> device name and mountpoint (e.g. /

Re: device naming (mentioned in Fedora Weekly News 259)

2011-01-21 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 01/21/2011 03:14 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > > Both approaches are needed, case by case. > > If there is only one NIC, I want it to be eth0. > But I also like that some external disks appear with their own > device name and mountpoint (e.g. /dev/backupdisk0) The way it is implemented, you are f

Re: device naming (mentioned in Fedora Weekly News 259)

2011-01-21 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 01/21/2011 02:24 AM, Tim wrote: > Interesting how someone, or some people, have seen the sense in making > network device names more obvious as to what they refer to, rather than > everything being generic eth0, etc. Well, on the other end it is very useful if your NIC is called eth0, because

device naming (mentioned in Fedora Weekly News 259)

2011-01-20 Thread Tim
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 19:47 +, Adam Williamson wrote: > Next week sees the first Fedora 15 Test Day[1], on network device > naming changes upcoming in Fedora 15. On compatible systems, Fedora 15 > will use biosdevname[2] to name the network interfaces; this provides > a fully deterministic nami