(responding to sixpack13)
> there are errors mostly regarding ACPI, but it doesn't seems
> to me that the box has difficulties to run.
Agreed. I used to see those (or something similar) every time I booted.
I haven't seen such messages in a while now.
> as I thought kmod-nvidia-5.0.7-200 bel
I forgot one point:
...
>
> Seems risky. Suppose I myself never used (for example) python,
> but it's
> "under the hood" of other packages (such as dnf). Would that command
> remove python?
...
un-needed python only, I would like to say.
dnf is self-protected and -I guess- all dependent pack
...
> See here:
> "https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/LrdPf~bE3iIlDkAPXHaPaw";
...
there are errors mostly regarding ACPI, but it doesn't seems to me that the box
has difficulties to run.
...
> -bash.14[~]: uname -a
> Linux [sys. name] 5.0.7-200.fc29.x86_64 ...
as I thought kmod-nvidia-5.0.7-
> dmesg|grep -iEw
bad|bug|conflict|corrupted|error|fail|failed|fault|fatal|Lock|NULL|segfault|stack|trace|warn'
See here:
"https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/LrdPf~bE3iIlDkAPXHaPaw";
for results.
> "uname -a" [etc]
Results:
-bash.14[~]: uname -a
Linux [sys. name] 5.0.7-200.fc29.x86_64 #1 SMP
If you are able to boot with F29 last kernels without errors you might want
remove old F2x kernels and their devel/module packages too.
dmesg|grep -iEw
'bad|bug|conflict|corrupted|error|fail|failed|fault|fatal|Lock|NULL|segfault|stack|trace|warn'
"uname -a" will tell you the release version of
Good afternoon,
A short while ago, I upgraded from f28 to f29. One post-upgrade step suggested
by the upgrade instructions is:
-
bash.3[~]: dnf list extras
Last metadata expiration check: 0:32:03 ago on Thu 18 Apr 2019 02:01:12 PM MDT.
Extra Packages
clutter-gst.x86_64