> Am 22.04.2023 um 15:40 schrieb Ranjan Maitra :
>
> I tried to change selinux to permissive on the F38 box, and then I was able
> to mount the share. However, the F37 box mounts the share fine, with selinux
> set at enforcing. So, should a separate context need to be created for F38?
> If so
To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: cifs mount error F38
>
>
>
> > On 21 Apr 2023, at 23:33, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >
> > Barry,
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >> On Fri
munity support for Fedora users
>> Subject: Re: cifs mount error F38
>>
>>
>>
>>>> On 21 Apr 2023, at 19:34, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>>>
>>> I recently upgraded two of my Fedora machines, but when I try to mount a
>>> Windows share
Barry,
Thanks!
On Fri Apr21'23 10:35:32PM, Barry wrote:
> From: Barry
> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 22:35:32 +0100
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: cifs mount error F38
>
>
>
> > On 21 Apr 2
> On 21 Apr 2023, at 19:34, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> I recently upgraded two of my Fedora machines, but when I try to mount a
> Windows share using mount-cifs, I get the following:
>
> mount error(126): Required key not available
>
> The mount.cifs command that is used has the following
>
I recently upgraded two of my Fedora machines, but when I try to mount a
Windows share using mount-cifs, I get the following:
mount error(126): Required key not available
The mount.cifs command that is used has the following
sec=ntlmssp,rw,nounix,noserverino,file_mode=0777,dir_mode=0777,vers=3
