Andre Robatino writes:
> Today Adobe released a newer Preview Version which is available for both 32-
> and
> 64-bit for Windows, MacOS, and Linux. The 64-bit version is working fine for
> me
> so far.
>
> http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html
>
> There is also a 3rd-party yum repo
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht gmail.com> writes:
> If flash is now very unsafe, is there a working alternative yet? Is
> there some way to play html5 content under Fedora-13? In theory youtube
> supports html5 playback, but it appears that out of box f-13 chromium
> doesn't. Do I just have it configur
On 9/15/10, JD wrote:
>
>
> On 09/15/2010 10:30 AM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>> I do recall using mplayer to play youtube *.flv videos at one point but
>> it was a real pain in the neck to dig the obfusciated video url out of
>> the javascript in order to download the *.flv file.
>
> You can
On 09/15/2010 10:30 AM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III writes:
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:25:25 -0700,
>>"Wolfgang S. Rupprecht" wrote:
>>> If flash is now very unsafe, is there a working alternative yet? Is
>> Adobe's flash player has been unsafe for a very long time an
Bruno Wolff III writes:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:25:25 -0700,
> "Wolfgang S. Rupprecht" wrote:
>>
>> If flash is now very unsafe, is there a working alternative yet? Is
>
> Adobe's flash player has been unsafe for a very long time and I don't expect
> that to change anytime soon.
Yea.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:25:25 -0700,
"Wolfgang S. Rupprecht" wrote:
>
> If flash is now very unsafe, is there a working alternative yet? Is
Adobe's flash player has been unsafe for a very long time and I don't expect
that to change anytime soon.
There are a few open source flash players a
Adobe Flash Player zero-day under attack
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/adobe-flash-player-zero-day-under-attack/7342
According to various news clips, Adobe won't have a fix for another 2
weeks days (till between Sept 27 and Oct 1).
If flash is now very unsafe, is there a working a