On 2/10/2012 12:11 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
On 2/10/2012 2:54 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Many thanks, I use your link as a staring point,
well, hopefully you'll be able to get past staring, and actually read
it ;-p -> run
Wow, that was a pretty good typo ...
On 2/10/2012 2:54 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Many thanks, I use your link as a staring point,
well, hopefully you'll be able to get past staring, and actually read it
;-p -> run
--
Claude Jones Brunswick, MD, USA
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraprojec
On 2/10/2012 5:34 AM, Claude Jones wrote:
did anyone suggest this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd
I have found it useful
Claude:
Nobody has suggested this and it looks promising. All I had found was
the Fedora release document which seemed to assume that I was already at
one with sy
On 02/10/2012 02:03 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 2/8/2012 10:26 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
.
Is there anything resembling a single doc/html/post/whatever that can
be used as a reference point to try to begin to understand what all
this entails (hopefully that assumes systemd is something n
On 2/8/2012 10:26 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
.
Is there anything resembling a single doc/html/post/whatever that can
be used as a reference point to try to begin to understand what all
this entails (hopefully that assumes systemd is something new to learn
rather than "of course you understa
On 2/8/2012 12:51 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
As far as systemd goes, more thought should have been done (IMAO) on
making the transition as smooth and transparent as possible. You
shouldn't expect the average non-techy user to know how to do
whatever's needed to find out if all of the services that wer
