On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 22:59 -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Tim wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:34 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> >> The link is:
> >> http://www.tnr.com/print/article/politics/76822/the-look-time
> >
> > That actually looks reasonably good
On 08/12/2010 12:30 PM, Roger K. Wells wrote:
> On 08/11/2010 11:59 PM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
>> That said, I do have the msttcore-fonts package installed.
>> Could the reason it looks like garbage for the OP be simply that?
>
> Same here and I also have msttcore-fonts installed.
> FireFox v
On 08/11/2010 11:59 PM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Tim wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:34 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
>>> The link is:
>>> http://www.tnr.com/print/article/politics/76822/the-look-time
>> That actually looks reasonably good, on screen, her
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 22:59 -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> I do have the msttcore-fonts package installed. Could the reason it
> looks like garbage for the OP be simply that?
Quite likely. In the absence of the requested font, the system will try
to find a replacement. That may be done by n
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:34 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
>> The link is:
>> http://www.tnr.com/print/article/politics/76822/the-look-time
>
> That actually looks reasonably good, on screen, here. Though grey
> writing on white background can be a pr
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 11:32 +0930, Tim wrote:
> I can't say that I've noticed it being that terrible.
Well, not for a long time (several years)...
I do remember some rather stupid renderings, not dependent on font or
webpage.
e.g. 12'34" would print as 12 ' 34 "
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:34 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> The link is:
> http://www.tnr.com/print/article/politics/76822/the-look-time
That actually looks reasonably good, on screen, here. Though grey
writing on white background can be a printing headache, as printers have
to dither black ink
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 13:46 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> Text to be printed by Firefox has disastrously bad text layout, and has
> had bad layout for years. An example is attached. The only way to get
> text well laid out is to copy it into a word processor (I use Open
> Office) and to print
Ah, go ahead and ask in #fedora. They know the exact package names; I
had this problem for the first fifteen minutes. They're font packages.
Try searching for tahoma.
On 8/11/10, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 22:04 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
>> On 11/08/10 21:46, Jonathan Ryshpa
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 22:04 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 11/08/10 21:46, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > Text to be printed by Firefox has disastrously bad text layout, and has
> > had bad layout for years. An example is attached. The only way to get
> > text well laid out is to copy it into a wor
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:46:02PM -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> Text to be printed by Firefox has disastrously bad text layout, and has
> had bad layout for years. An example is attached. The only way to get
> text well laid out is to copy it into a word processor (I use Open
> Office) and to
There are some font packages that start with ttf (if I remember correctly) that
fix this problem cleanly.
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:33:47 -0400
Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > Text to be printed by Firefox has disastrously bad text layout, and has
>
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> Text to be printed by Firefox has disastrously bad text layout, and has
> had bad layout for years. An example is attached. The only way to get
> text well laid out is to copy it into a word processor (I use Open
> Office) and to print i
On 11/08/10 21:46, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> Text to be printed by Firefox has disastrously bad text layout, and has
> had bad layout for years. An example is attached. The only way to get
> text well laid out is to copy it into a word processor (I use Open
> Office) and to print it out from ther
On 08/11/2010 01:46 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> Text to be printed by Firefox has disastrously bad text layout, and has
> had bad layout for years. An example is attached. The only way to get
> text well laid out is to copy it into a word processor (I use Open
> Office) and to print it out fr
Text to be printed by Firefox has disastrously bad text layout, and has
had bad layout for years. An example is attached. The only way to get
text well laid out is to copy it into a word processor (I use Open
Office) and to print it out from there.
Who else has noticed this? Is there a known cu
16 matches
Mail list logo
