On 6/22/19 12:16 PM, Tim via users wrote:
> But, yes, before posting that I didn't know what they were, I had read
> the package info, and it didn't particularly leave me any wiser.
>
> $ dnf info openvswitch
>
> Description: Open vSwitch provides standard network bridging functions
> and support f
Ed Greshko:
>>> I guess you did "dnf info openvswitch" and "dnf info libhugetlbf"?
>>>
>>> I'm guessing those are what resulted in the reservation of the
>>> ID's.
Jon LaBadie:
>> What? Just asking for information as an ordinary user might
>> cause a change to system files? Doesn't seem likely.
On 6/22/19 5:03 AM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>> I guess you did "dnf info openvswitch" and "dnf info libhugetlbf"?
>>
>> I'm guessing those are what resulted in the reservation of the ID's.
> What? Just asking for information as an ordinary user might
> cause a change to system files? Doesn't seem like
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:31:46PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 6/18/19 10:56 PM, Tim via users wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I recently set up Fedora 30 as a new install on a blank SDD. When I
> > went to create my user it got UID 1000, as I expected (since I was the
> > first user). But, not as I exp
On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 11:22 +0200, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> Maybe the bast solution:
> - remove the packages
> - change the groupid in /etc/group to an unused value < 1000
> - changw you groupid to 1000
> - reinstall the packages
What I've done, and so far so good:
1. Remove the only identifia
On 6/19/19 5:22 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
>
> Maybe the bast solution:
> - remove the packages
> - change the groupid in /etc/group to an unused value < 1000
> - changw you groupid to 1000
> - reinstall the packages
>
I think, unless the OP knows he needs the packages, he can skip the last step.
On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 23:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 6/18/19 10:56 PM, Tim via users wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I recently set up Fedora 30 as a new install on a blank SDD. When
> > I
> > went to create my user it got UID 1000, as I expected (since I was
> > the
> > first user). But, not as I e
On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 11:24 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> It looks like this was filed as:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1646774
>
> It's not clear whether the maintainer intends to push the
> trivial fix to existing branches or not. I think that it
> should be fixed in f29 and f30 as wel
On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 23:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> I guess you did "dnf info openvswitch" and "dnf info libhugetlbf"?
No, I did a default install of the Mate spin. Then I've installed
evolution, gvim, autofs, vlc, youtube-dl, smplayer.
# dnf history
ID | Command line | Date
On 6/18/19 10:56 PM, Tim via users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently set up Fedora 30 as a new install on a blank SDD. When I
> went to create my user it got UID 1000, as I expected (since I was the
> first user). But, not as I expected, it got GID 1001, because
> something else had already grabbed it:
Hi,
Tim via users wrote:
> I recently set up Fedora 30 as a new install on a blank SDD. When I
> went to create my user it got UID 1000, as I expected (since I was the
> first user). But, not as I expected, it got GID 1001, because
> something else had already grabbed it:
>
> $ cat /etc/group|g
Hi,
I recently set up Fedora 30 as a new install on a blank SDD. When I
went to create my user it got UID 1000, as I expected (since I was the
first user). But, not as I expected, it got GID 1001, because
something else had already grabbed it:
$ cat /etc/group|grep 1000
hugetlbfs:x:1000:openvsw
12 matches
Mail list logo
