[Testdays] Call for Fedora Linux 43 testing events

sted users and developers together to test a specific feature or area of the distribution. You can run a Test Day on just about anything for which it would be useful to do some fairly focused testing in 'real time' with a group of testers; it doesn't have to be code, for instance, w

[Testdays] Call for Fedora Linux 42 testing events

sted users and developers together to test a specific feature or area of the distribution. You can run a Test Day on just about anything for which it would be useful to do some fairly focused testing in 'real time' with a group of testers; it doesn't have to be code, for instance, w

[Testdays] Call for Fedora Linux 41 testing events

sted users and developers together to test a specific feature or area of the distribution. You can run a Test Day on just about anything for which it would be useful to do some fairly focused testing in 'real time' with a group of testers; it doesn't have to be code, for instance, w

[Call for Action] Testing Alibaba Cloud for Fedora CoreOS 40

Hey folks, As many of you might know, we are currently running the Fedora 40 CoreOS Test Week.[0] We would like to have anyone with Alibaba account to run this test case[1] and report [2] under Alibaba column. Should you have any questions, please let us know via email or https://matrix.to/#/#tes

Invitation to Contribute to Fedora Test Days: Podman Desktop Testing

Dear Fedora Community Member, We are excited to invite you to participate in an upcoming Fedora Test Day focused on testing Podman Desktop. Podman Desktop is an innovative tool that enables you to manage containers on your desktop with ease. Date: 2024-03-20 Your feedback and testing are

[Testdays] Call for Fedora Linux 40 testing events

sted users and developers together to test a specific feature or area of the distribution. You can run a Test Day on just about anything for which it would be useful to do some fairly focused testing in 'real time' with a group of testers; it doesn't have to be code, for instance, w

Re: Kernel 6.4.3 is now available for testing in koji

And now done with the last kernel testing for this test week :) Den tors 13 juli 2023 kl 08:26 skrev Luna Jernberg : > > Did run a test yesterday, and will run some more tests this week until > Sunday as much as i have time > > Den ons 12 juli 2023 kl 18:03 skrev Sumantro Mukherje

Re: Kernel 6.4.3 is now available for testing in koji

6.4.3 is fresh and you can now provide feedback! > Thanks a lot to all for making the test weeks so successful. The links > for test weeks can be found here[0]. Results can be submitted here[1] > and the new build is [2] > > Happy Testing! > > [0] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/T

Kernel 6.4.3 is now available for testing in koji

] and the new build is [2] Happy Testing! [0] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2023-07-09_Kernel_6.4_Test_Week [1] https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/160 [2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2230199 -- //sumantro Fedora QE TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED

Re: Where is the Fedora Testing Release repo?

On 6/27/23 14:37, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Where is the Fedora Testing Release repo for Fedora 37? (I am after the URL not now to run DNF.) Unfortunately, I have only gotten to https://ap.edge.kernel.org/fedora/releases/37/ And could not find it. Many thanks, -T If you guys

Re: Where is the Fedora Testing Release repo?

On 6/27/23 14:44, Todd Zullinger wrote: ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Where is the Fedora Testing Release repo for Fedora 37? (I am after the URL not now to run DNF.) Unfortunately, I have only gotten to https://ap.edge.kernel.org/fedora/releases/37/ And could not find it. The

Re: Where is the Fedora Testing Release repo?

On 6/27/23 14:42, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 6/27/23 14:37, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Where is the Fedora Testing Release repo for Fedora 37? (I am after the URL not now to run DNF.) Unfortunately, I have only gotten to https://ap.edge.kernel.org/fedora/releases/37/ And could not

Re: Where is the Fedora Testing Release repo?

ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Hi All, > > Where is the Fedora Testing Release repo for Fedora 37? > (I am after the URL not now to run DNF.) > > Unfortunately, I have only gotten to > > https://ap.edge.kernel.org/fedora/releases/37/ > > And could not find it

Re: Where is the Fedora Testing Release repo?

On 6/27/23 14:37, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Where is the Fedora Testing Release repo for Fedora 37? (I am after the URL not now to run DNF.) Unfortunately, I have only gotten to https://ap.edge.kernel.org/fedora/releases/37/ And could not find it. https://ap.edge.kernel.org

Where is the Fedora Testing Release repo?

Hi All, Where is the Fedora Testing Release repo for Fedora 37? (I am after the URL not now to run DNF.) Unfortunately, I have only gotten to https://ap.edge.kernel.org/fedora/releases/37/ And could not find it. Many thanks, -T -- ~~ Computers are like

Re: stress testing

system, I was looking into the availability of open-source stress testing tools. Turns out that there is one in the Fedora distribution, aptly named "stress". A web search turned up a number of "best of" articles, none of which mentioned the Fedora "stress" tool. Any opi

Re: stress testing

On Wed, 31 May 2023 17:01:15 -0400 Jeffrey Walton wrote: > $ dnf search stress > Fedora 38 OpenH264 (from Cisco) - x86_644.9 kB/s | 2.5 kB > 00:00 stress.x86_64 : A tool to put given subsystems under a > specified load stress-ng.x86_64 : Stress test a computer system in > various ways str

Re: stress testing

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 4:51 PM Geoffrey Leach wrote: > > In anticipation of the arrival of a new system, I was looking into the > availability of open-source stress testing tools. Turns out that there > is one in the Fedora distribution, aptly named "stress". What are

stress testing

In anticipation of the arrival of a new system, I was looking into the availability of open-source stress testing tools. Turns out that there is one in the Fedora distribution, aptly named "stress". A web search turned up a number of "best of" articles, none of which mentione

[Testdays] Call for Fedora Linux 39 testing events

sted users and developers together to test a specific feature or area of the distribution. You can run a Test Day on just about anything for which it would be useful to do some fairly focused testing in 'real time' with a group of testers; it doesn't have to be code, for instance, w

Re: Request for testing: fail2ban 1.0.1 update

On 10/17/22 15:14, Richard Shaw wrote: If you can, please file an issue upstream and let me know what the URL is. Include as much info as you're able, especially any relevant log file entries. https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues Tha

Re: Request for testing: fail2ban 1.0.1 update

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 2:12 PM Charles Dennett wrote: > > I've been testing f2b over the past few days and I can now make it fail > on demand. By that I mean the fail2ban-server process uses 100% of a > cpu and becomes unresponsive and will not respond to fail2ban-client or &g

Re: Request for testing: fail2ban 1.0.1 update

I've been testing f2b over the past few days and I can now make it fail on demand. By that I mean the fail2ban-server process uses 100% of a cpu and becomes unresponsive and will not respond to fail2ban-client or process any other log entries (apache, sshd, etc.) whenever it attempt

Re: Request for testing: fail2ban 1.0.1 update

Version 1.0.1 now seems to be running. As I noted before, my problem had something to do with the dovecot jail. I did notice a few config files had .rpmnew versions after upgrading. I went through just to make sure there were no local mods. I do have .local files so I should not have made

Re: Request for testing: fail2ban 1.0.1 update

On 10/14/22 13:07, Richard Shaw wrote: Interestingly, I did not have any issues, but I'm only running a sshd jail, which is one of the reasons I wanted wider testing. I verified that fail2ban was restarted (systemctl status fail2ban) and then checked the status (fail2ban-client status

Re: Request for testing: fail2ban 1.0.1 update

Interestingly, I did not have any issues, but I'm only running a sshd jail, which is one of the reasons I wanted wider testing. I verified that fail2ban was restarted (systemctl status fail2ban) and then checked the status (fail2ban-client status sshd) and everything was fine. I also did a

Re: Request for testing: fail2ban 1.0.1 update

I saw a similar problem in my f36 system. 100% CPU usage for the fail2ban-server process after upgrading to 1.0.1-1. I also tried removing the sqlite database with no impact. fail2ban-server was so busy it would not receive connections from fail2ban-client. I enabled DEBUG logging, but that

Re: Request for testing: fail2ban 1.0.1 update

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 9:55 AM Charlie Dennett wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 2:57 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > >> I have disabled auto-stable based on time for the updates: I have >> submitted updates for f36 and up and EPEL 9. >> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=fail2ban >>

Re: Request for testing: fail2ban 1.0.1 update

On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 2:57 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > I have disabled auto-stable based on time for the updates: I have > submitted updates for f36 and up and EPEL 9. > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=fail2ban > > I would like some sort of confirmation on the update itself or by

Request for testing: fail2ban 1.0.1 update

I have disabled auto-stable based on time for the updates: I have submitted updates for f36 and up and EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=fail2ban I would like some sort of confirmation on the update itself or by direct communication that everything appears to be working prop

Podman 4.0 rc2 is available in updates-testing.

We would love to have people play with this and test it out. Note: this release has breaking changes to it's API, so it will not be released to f35. Only to F36, but users will be able to download and use it on F35, we will not push it to stable though. https://github.com/containers/podman/re

pipewire testing

Hi, By following the information at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DefaultPipeWire pipewire is working OK for pulseaudio applications on my Fedora 33 machine. However, when I follow the instruction to install the pipewire-libjack RPM, dnf tries to reinstall some of the pulseaudio pack

Re: testing update

On 10/23/20 2:51 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:02:23 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: Do I need to dnf remove rpmfusion-free-release-32-1.noarch rpmfusion doesn't even have a testing repo. You need to provide more details. Of course they still offer a testing rep

Re: testing update

On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:02:23 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > Do I need to dnf remove rpmfusion-free-release-32-1.noarch > > rpmfusion doesn't even have a testing repo. You need to provide more > details. Of course they still offer a testing repo for updates, and its .r

Re: testing update

On 10/20/20 12:53 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:37:04 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote: On 10/20/20 11:12 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: I did: dnf config-manager --set-disabled updates-testing But then , how to I uninstall the packages depending on updates-testing Why do you need

Re: testing update

On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:37:04 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 10/20/20 11:12 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > I did: > > dnf config-manager --set-disabled updates-testing > > > > But then , how to I uninstall the packages depending on updates-testing > > Why do you ne

Re: testing update

On 10/20/20 11:12 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: I did: dnf config-manager --set-disabled updates-testing But then , how to I uninstall the packages depending on updates-testing Why do you need to? Eventually those packages will end up in the regular updates repo and you would get them anyway

Re: testing update

I did: dnf config-manager --set-disabled updates-testing But then , how to I uninstall the packages depending on updates-testing ? === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire

Re: testing update

On 10/20/20 11:05 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: dnf config-manager --disablerepo=updates-testing Command line error: one of the following arguments is required: --save --add-repo --dump --dump-variables --set-enabled --enable --set-disabled --disable Sorry, that was the wrong command. dnf config

Re: testing update

dnf config-manager --disablerepo=updates-testing Command line error: one of the following arguments is required: --save --add-repo --dump --dump-variables --set-enabled --enable --set-disabled --disable === Patrick DUPRÉ

Re: testing update

On 10/20/20 10:57 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: How do I avoid testing update? If you've somehow enabled the updates-testing repo, then run: sudo dnf config-manager --disablerepo=updates-testing Do I need to dnf remove rpmfusion-free-release-32-1.noarch rpmfusion doesn't even have

testing update

Hello, How do I avoid testing update? Do I need to dnf remove rpmfusion-free-release-32-1.noarch ? Thanks === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot

Re: 'updates-testing' failed ??

On 11/4/19 8:31 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 11/5/19 12:08 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 11/4/19 5:00 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 16:50:23 -0800 ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Failed to download metadata for repo 'updates-testing' Error: Failed to download metadat

Re: 'updates-testing' failed ??

On 11/5/19 12:08 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 11/4/19 5:00 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 16:50:23 -0800 ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Failed to download metadata for repo 'updates-testing' Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'updates-testing'

Re: 'updates-testing' failed ??

On 11/4/19 5:00 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 16:50:23 -0800 ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Failed to download metadata for repo 'updates-testing' Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'updates-testing' I've been getting this a lot for random differ

Re: 'updates-testing' failed ??

On 11/4/19 4:59 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: Try again will do ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/pro

Re: 'updates-testing' failed ??

On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 16:50:23 -0800 ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Failed to download metadata for repo 'updates-testing' > Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'updates-testing' I've been getting this a lot for random different repos. I usually wait a few

Re: 'updates-testing' failed ??

On 11/5/19 8:50 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Is this me or them? Does "fedora-updates-testing-modular.repo" supersede "fedora-updates-testing.repo"? Probably an issue with a mirror. [egreshko@meimei ~]$ sudo dnf --refresh --enablerepo=updates-testing

'updates-testing' failed ??

Hi All, Is this me or them? Does "fedora-updates-testing-modular.repo" supersede "fedora-updates-testing.repo"? Many thanks, -T # dnf --enablerepo=* update ... Fedora 31 - x86_64 - Test Updates 7.2 kB/s | 3.4 kB 00:00 Failed to download metadata for repo 'updates-

Re: Is using "updates-testing-" repository for at single package possible?

nerabilities and Exposures (CVE) such as the recent firefox update.  Or any other "security advisory". I could understand why one would want an update ASAP and get it from updates-testing.  But, there seems no value to tying a package to that repo unless you're going to alway

Re: Is using "updates-testing-" repository for at single package possible?

On 6/23/19 9:56 PM, Max Andersen via users wrote: On 6/23/19 10:33 AM, Max Andersen via users wrote: Not sure what you're saying here. Which repository? If you install a package, it will get updated if it's available in a repository. Packages from updates-testing end up in the regul

Re: Is using "updates-testing-" repository for at single package possible?

> On 6/23/19 10:33 AM, Max Andersen via users wrote: > > Not sure what you're saying here. Which repository? If you install a > package, it will get updated if it's available in a repository. > Packages from updates-testing end up in the regular updates repository

Re: Is using "updates-testing-" repository for at single package possible?

On 6/23/19 10:33 AM, Max Andersen via users wrote: Thank you for your answer. That might be exactly what I'm looking for. You describe the catch 22 nicely. I believe that if I install a package from testing I need it to be updated, of course. I won't get that unless I also put it i

Re: Is using "updates-testing-" repository for at single package possible?

m updates-testing to updates. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guideli

Re: Is using "updates-testing-" repository for at single package possible?

Hi Samuel, Thank you for your answer. That might be exactly what I'm looking for. You describe the catch 22 nicely. I believe that if I install a package from testing I need it to be updated, of course. I won't get that unless I also put it in the name of the package in the

Re: Is using "updates-testing-" repository for at single package possible?

On 6/22/19 10:39 PM, Max Andersen via users wrote: I am curious if it is possible to have 1 package that is using the "updates-testing" repository and the rest using the stable one? According to the docs, it looks like you can do that. Edit the /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates-te

Is using "updates-testing-" repository for at single package possible?

Hi everyone, I installed a package from "updates-testing" repository, but I noticed that it doesn't get updated from "updates-testing" repository, moving forward, when the system is configured to only use stable repository in general. Even if I used the parameter/optio

Re: Is something wrong with the testing mailing list?

On 4/19/19 4:41 AM, Todd Chester via users wrote: On 4/19/19 4:04 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 4/19/19 6:42 PM, Todd Chester via users wrote: Hi All, I noticed that testing mailing list suddenly went dead.  So I when to the archives https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test

Re: Is something wrong with the testing mailing list?

On 4/19/19 4:04 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 4/19/19 6:42 PM, Todd Chester via users wrote: Hi All, I noticed that testing mailing list suddenly went dead.  So I when to the archives https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test%40lists.fedoraproject.org/ and noticed that posts are

Re: Is something wrong with the testing mailing list?

On 4/19/19 6:42 PM, Todd Chester via users wrote: > Hi All, > > I noticed that testing mailing list suddenly went > dead.  So I when to the archives > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test%40lists.fedoraproject.org/ > > and noticed that posts are arriving, b

Is something wrong with the testing mailing list?

Hi All, I noticed that testing mailing list suddenly went dead. So I when to the archives https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test%40lists.fedoraproject.org/ and noticed that posts are arriving, but no one is answering them. So apparently nothing is getting relayed back to members

Re: Testing gnuplot with libcerf

On 11/06/2018 12:17 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: Most languages have a math library containing a pi constant that is as precise as the computer can store.  How is using a trig function going to be more accurate? This was from back in the early 1980s, when languages didn't have those constants built

Re: Testing gnuplot with libcerf

On 11/5/18 9:07 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 11/05/2018 09:44 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: pi = 4 arctan (1) if you need Excellent!  That was exactly what I was going to suggest.  Decades ago, the late Dan Alderson (The man who wrote JPL's main space probe navigation package.) told me that you should

Re: Testing gnuplot with libcerf

On 11/05/2018 09:44 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: pi = 4 arctan (1) if you need Excellent! That was exactly what I was going to suggest. Decades ago, the late Dan Alderson (The man who wrote JPL's main space probe navigation package.) told me that you should always use that because it gave you

Re: Testing gnuplot with libcerf

> > On 11/05/2018 07:49 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > I am sorry for the confusion. > > I use gnuplot > > I don't, so I presume that pi is predefined. Yes, pi = 4 arctan (1) if you need > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To uns

Re: Testing gnuplot with libcerf

On 11/05/2018 07:49 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: I am sorry for the confusion. I use gnuplot I don't, so I presume that pi is predefined. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproje

Re: Testing gnuplot with libcerf

> On 11/05/2018 06:31 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > >> > >> On 11/05/2018 05:32 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > >>> sqrt_pi = sqrt (pi) > >>> > >>> z (x, y) = x + I * y > >>> w (z) = faddeeva (z) / sqrt_pi # Normalized > >>> plot real (w (z (x, 1)) > >>> > >>> > >>> Good luck. > >> > >> How do you initial

Re: Testing gnuplot with libcerf

On 11/05/2018 06:31 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: On 11/05/2018 05:32 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: sqrt_pi = sqrt (pi) z (x, y) = x + I * y w (z) = faddeeva (z) / sqrt_pi # Normalized plot real (w (z (x, 1)) Good luck. How do you initialize pi? ___ I do

Re: Testing gnuplot with libcerf

> > On 11/05/2018 05:32 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > sqrt_pi = sqrt (pi) > > > > z (x, y) = x + I * y > > w (z) = faddeeva (z) / sqrt_pi # Normalized > > plot real (w (z (x, 1)) > > > > > > Good luck. > > How do you initialize pi? > ___ I do not have.

Re: Testing gnuplot with libcerf

On 11/05/2018 05:32 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: sqrt_pi = sqrt (pi) z (x, y) = x + I * y w (z) = faddeeva (z) / sqrt_pi # Normalized plot real (w (z (x, 1)) Good luck. How do you initialize pi? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org T

Re: Testing gnuplot with libcerf

ue, France === > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2018 at 9:12 PM > From: "Ronaldo Mercado" > To: "Community support for Fedora users" > Subject: Testing gnuplot with libcerf > > Hi, > > I would like to tes

Re: Testing gnuplot with libcerf

On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 17:03, Ronaldo Mercado wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to test an update to gnuplot from bugzilla #1476616. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476616 > > I am using fedora 28 and I managed to install the package okay from copr > I don't know my way around gnuplot.

Testing gnuplot with libcerf

Hi, I would like to test an update to gnuplot from bugzilla #1476616. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476616 I am using fedora 28 and I managed to install the package okay from copr I don't know my way around gnuplot. I tried the simple plot from http://gnuplot.sourceforge.net/demo/s

Re: BackupPC 4.1.0 testing needed - Any BackupPC users on the group?

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Robert Nichols wrote: > >> How well are hard-linked files handled? If I restore /var/lib/yum/yumdb > from the most recent backup, will the restored files be hard-linked the > same way they were when the backup was made? Will that also be true if I > restore a vers

Re: BackupPC 4.1.0 testing needed - Any BackupPC users on the group?

On 03/30/2017 07:32 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: I have taken over maintenance of the BackupPC package and have made the update to 4.1.0 available through COPR[1] for now for a couple of reasons: 1. It's a huge change, hardlinks are no longer used for deduplication, but v4 can read v3 backups. 2.

BackupPC 4.1.0 testing needed - Any BackupPC users on the group?

I have taken over maintenance of the BackupPC package and have made the update to 4.1.0 available through COPR[1] for now for a couple of reasons: 1. It's a huge change, hardlinks are no longer used for deduplication, but v4 can read v3 backups. 2. Some of the settings in /etc/BackupPC/config.pl

Re: off topic -- web testing/scraping question.

On Sat, 2016-10-15 at 23:44 -0400, bruce wrote: > I've seen some articles that imply it's doable to fire off/run a real > browser ff/chrome from the cmd line with the targetd url ,which would then > produce the required output. (But haven't seen any pointers/exmples on how > to accomplish as of yet

off topic -- web testing/scraping question.

Hi guys. Dealing with an issue -- waay off topic fr fed! (but thought I' post, see if anyone has thoughts..) I'm dealing with a testing/scraping process of a target site. Collecting isbn data for college classes. The site has gone to using obfuscation/encryption/etc.. whic

Re: rpmfusion updates-testing repos enabled in Fedora23

On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:43:47 -0700 CS DBA wrote: > Should I leave the testing repos enabled? Has the rpmfusion repos > changed such that I should want this? Those are the only repos that contain anything in f23 rpmfusion at the moment. When the rpmfusion folks think they actually have a

rpmfusion updates-testing repos enabled in Fedora23

I noticed that the rpmfusion-free-updates-testing and rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing repos are also enabled. I thought the testing repos were for packages still in testing mode, thus if I want a more stable system they should be disabled. Should I leave the testing repos enabled? Has the

Re: Audacity lovers - request for testing

W dniu 16.11.2015 o 21:50, David Timms pisze: The next version of Audacity is soon to be released, but I would like some help from users who can test the packaged release candidate in the next few days [1], [2]. Both positive and negative feedback in bodhi [3] and bugs [4] if not already submitte

Audacity lovers - request for testing

://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=699427 [2] dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing install audacity * may need a day or two. [3] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-51664dda77 [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&classificatio

Re: how do i pick up the new rpms in updates-testing?

zi wrote: > On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:25:25 -0400 (EDT) > "Robert P. J. Day" wrote: > > > no, my updates-testing repo *is* enabled ... i'm asking about an > > obvious time lag from the time i see those rpms in the repo, and when > > my local dnf

Re: how do i pick up the new rpms in updates-testing?

On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:25:25 -0400 (EDT) "Robert P. J. Day" wrote: > no, my updates-testing repo *is* enabled ... i'm asking about an > obvious time lag from the time i see those rpms in the repo, and when > my local dnf command finally sees them. So

Re: how do i pick up the new rpms in updates-testing?

On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Zach Villers wrote: > sudo dnf config-manager --set-enabled updates-testing > should enable the repo you need. no, my updates-testing repo *is* enabled ... i'm asking about an obvious time lag from the time i see those rpms in the repo, and when my local

Re: how do i pick up the new rpms in updates-testing?

the new packages now available? i can *see* here: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/22/x86_64/n/ the new NetworkManager rpm that solves a particular problem i've run into, but no variation of "dnf update" i run will pick it up.

how do i pick up the new rpms in updates-testing?

almost certainly a stupid question, but how do i force "dnf update" to consult the latest mirrors to see the new packages now available? i can *see* here: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/22/x86_64/n/ the new NetworkManager rpm that solves a particul

Re: dnf seems to be broken after the most recent updates, including updates-testing

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 19:47:43 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: downgrading dnf-langpacks to version 0.10.0-1 (using yum-deprecated) helps. You can also use the --disbleplugin=langpacks option instead of using yum-deprecated. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscrib

Re: dnf seems to be broken after the most recent updates, including updates-testing

On 18.07.2015 19:47, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 18.07.2015 19:36, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:25:01 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: >> >>> Hi all F22 users, >>> >>> it seems dnf is broken after the most rec

Re: dnf seems to be broken after the most recent updates, including updates-testing

On 18.07.2015 19:36, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:25:01 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > >> Hi all F22 users, >> >> it seems dnf is broken after the most recent updates (including >> updates-testing): > >> ConfigParser.NoOptionError: N

Re: dnf seems to be broken after the most recent updates, including updates-testing

On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:25:01 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi all F22 users, > > it seems dnf is broken after the most recent updates (including > updates-testing): > ConfigParser.NoOptionError: No option u'langpack_locales&#

dnf seems to be broken after the most recent updates, including updates-testing

Hi all F22 users, it seems dnf is broken after the most recent updates (including updates-testing): - sudo dnf update Traceback (most recent call last): File "/bin/dnf", line 36, in main.user_main(

Re: testing snapper f21 btrfs

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 09:06 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: >> I have a default btrfs install of f21. >> >> sudo btrfs subvolume list / >> ID 257 gen 32476 top level 5 path root >> >> I copied /etc/snapper/config-templates/default to >> /etc/snapper/config/default, and edi

Re: testing snapper f21 btrfs

On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 09:06 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > I have a default btrfs install of f21. > > sudo btrfs subvolume list / > ID 257 gen 32476 top level 5 path root > > I copied /etc/snapper/config-templates/default to > /etc/snapper/config/default, and edited /etc/sysconfig/snapper to > SNA

testing snapper f21 btrfs

I have a default btrfs install of f21. sudo btrfs subvolume list / ID 257 gen 32476 top level 5 path root I copied /etc/snapper/config-templates/default to /etc/snapper/config/default, and edited /etc/sysconfig/snapper to SNAPPER_CONFIGS="default" BTW: there is NO documentation about this ins

Re: Testing F21 kernel update kernel-3.18.9-200.fc21

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > If you go to: > admin.fedoraproject.org/updates > and type in kernel, you'll see kernel-3.18.9-200.fc21 is in "testing" > which translates into > > # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing kerne

Re: Testing F21 kernel update kernel-3.18.9-200.fc21

gt; > I do not see the kernel update with yum check-update command: > > LANG="" su -c 'yum check-update --enablerepo=updates-testing kernel' > # Loaded plugins: langpacks > > No more output. I then tried > > LANG="" su -c 'yum update --enabl

Re: Testing F21 kernel update kernel-3.18.9-200.fc21

ey appear in updates-testing and then to install them: # yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing kernel Ralf -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fe

Testing F21 kernel update kernel-3.18.9-200.fc21

27;yum check-update --enablerepo=updates-testing kernel' # Loaded plugins: langpacks No more output. I then tried LANG="" su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates kernel-3.18.9-200.fc21' # Loaded plugins: langpacks # No Match for argument: kernel-3.18.9-200.fc21 # No package

Re: testing of drives!

s that are installed/formatted if > possible!! > > thanks again!! > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:39 AM, bruce wrote: > > Morning -- > > > > Got a situation where we have a number of used/older dell boxes > > running centos/fedora (should be the same proc

  1   2   3   >