Re: TB 45.2.0 max folder size

2016-08-14 Thread geo.inbox.ignored
On 08/14/2016 04:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: <<<>>> > The issue has nothing to do with "unsigned 64 bit file sizes" or the > ability of TB to work with large files. > > The issue is simply that the developers "failed" to find all the > instances in their code which checked the file size prior to p

Re: TB 45.2.0 max folder size

2016-08-14 Thread Ed Greshko
On 08/15/16 02:35, jd1008 wrote: > > > On 08/14/2016 04:18 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> >> On 08/14/16 13:12, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> On 08/14/16 08:45, jd1008 wrote: Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB. I just tried to move con

Re: TB 45.2.0 max folder size

2016-08-14 Thread jd1008
On 08/14/2016 04:18 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 08/14/16 13:12, Ed Greshko wrote: On 08/14/16 08:45, jd1008 wrote: Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB. I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a backup inbox, which would hav

Re: TB 45.2.0 max folder size

2016-08-14 Thread jd1008
Come on man I am using TB-34.2.0 (latest) and it cannot allow files (folders) to grow beyond 4GB. Why do you believe BS? On 08/13/2016 11:12 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 08/14/16 08:45, jd1008 wrote: Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB

Re: TB 45.2.0 max folder size

2016-08-14 Thread geo.inbox.ignored
On 08/14/2016 05:24 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2016-08-13 at 18:45 -0600, jd1008 wrote: >> Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB >> still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB. > > What is "the TB"? Context-free acronyms are not immediately obvious to > everyone. > ===> tb

Re: TB 45.2.0 max folder size

2016-08-14 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2016-08-13 at 18:45 -0600, jd1008 wrote: > Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB > still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB. What is "the TB"? Context-free acronyms are not immediately obvious to everyone. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: TB 45.2.0 max folder size

2016-08-14 Thread Ed Greshko
On 08/14/16 13:12, Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 08/14/16 08:45, jd1008 wrote: >> Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB >> still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB. >> >> I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a backup inbox, >> which would have increased the size of the b

Re: TB 45.2.0 max folder size

2016-08-13 Thread geo.inbox.ignored
On 08/13/2016 09:51 PM, jd1008 wrote: > On 08/13/2016 07:52 PM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: >> >> On 08/13/2016 07:45 PM, jd1008 wrote: >>> Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB >>> still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB. >>> >>> I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into

Re: TB 45.2.0 max folder size

2016-08-13 Thread Ed Greshko
On 08/14/16 08:45, jd1008 wrote: > Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB > still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB. > > I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a backup inbox, > which would have increased the size of the backup by 30+ MB, > and I got the following war

Re: TB 45.2.0 max folder size

2016-08-13 Thread jd1008
On 08/13/2016 08:00 PM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: On 08/13/2016 08:52 PM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: On 08/13/2016 07:45 PM, jd1008 wrote: Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB. I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a back

Re: TB 45.2.0 max folder size

2016-08-13 Thread jd1008
On 08/13/2016 07:52 PM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: On 08/13/2016 07:45 PM, jd1008 wrote: Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB. I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a backup inbox, which would have increased the size of th

Re: TB 45.2.0 max folder size

2016-08-13 Thread geo.inbox.ignored
On 08/13/2016 08:52 PM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: > > > On 08/13/2016 07:45 PM, jd1008 wrote: >> Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB >> still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB. >> >> I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a backup inbox, >> which would have increa

Re: TB 45.2.0 max folder size

2016-08-13 Thread geo.inbox.ignored
On 08/13/2016 07:45 PM, jd1008 wrote: > Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB > still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB. > > I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a backup inbox, > which would have increased the size of the backup by 30+ MB, > and I got the followi

TB 45.2.0 max folder size

2016-08-13 Thread jd1008
Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB. I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a backup inbox, which would have increased the size of the backup by 30+ MB, and I got the following warning message: The folder Inbox.Bkup is full,