On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Deron Meranda wrote:
> One more interesting thing... I just completed my reboot, and my
> system now seems quite happy.
> However when I selected the kernel to use in the grub menu, it quickly said
>
> Loading Fedora (3.1.1-1.fc16.x86_64)
>
> even though I had e
>> Thanks again everybody. Oh, any idea about the grubby error?
>
> Did you update from F15?
>
> You probably have /etc/grub.cfg and /boot/grub left lying around. That
> confuses grubby. You can remove /etc/grub.cfg to shut it up, then, in a few
> /boot/grub.
Yes, it was an upgrade from F15, whi
Deron Meranda writes:
Thanks again everybody. Oh, any idea about the grubby error?
Did you update from F15?
You probably have /etc/grub.cfg and /boot/grub left lying around. That
confuses grubby. You can remove /etc/grub.cfg to shut it up, then, in a few
months, once the confidence level
Kevin Fenzi said:
> ok. Then I fear you will need to go to:
>
> package-cleanup --cleandupes
Great news. I think I've finally got my system back to a clean and
updated state! Thanks everybody who helped. I only have one curious
error message about a missing grubby template (explained toward the
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:36:47 -0500
Deron Meranda wrote:
> > I'll suggest again:
> >
> > yum history redo last
> >
> > (or you may need to find out which tansaction it was with 'yum
> > history list' and then use that number instead of 'last')
>
>
> Thanks. I read right over that the first time.
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:36:47 -0500
Deron Meranda wrote:
> And then doing a "yum check" again confirms that it is still confused
> and has multiple versions installed.
The last time I got in this state, I finally resorted to
doing low-level rpm commands to remove the old versions of
the duplicates
> I'll suggest again:
>
> yum history redo last
>
> (or you may need to find out which tansaction it was with 'yum history
> list' and then use that number instead of 'last')
Thanks. I read right over that the first time.
Unfortunately it doesn't seem to have worked
# yum history redo last
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:45:14 -0500
Deron Meranda wrote:
...snip...
> How can I clean all this up? I tried just re-running the yum update
> on the specific packages, but it complains, such as:
>
>Error: Protected multilib versions: at-3.1.13-5.fc16.x86_64 !=
> at-3.1.13-3.fc16.x86_64
>
>
I have run an rpm verify against all of the packages that were part of
the crashed yum update:
at-3.1.13-5.fc16.x86_64
bind-libs-9.8.1-4.P1.fc16.x86_64
bind-9.8.1-4.P1.fc16.x86_64
bind-license-9.8.1-4.P1.fc16.noarch
facter-1.6.2-1.fc16.noarch
kernel-3.1.1-2.fc16.x86_64
kernel-headers-3.1.1-2.fc16.
I ran the yum-complete-transaction but it seems to have refused to run
(output below).
# yum-complete-transaction
...
There are 1 outstanding transactions to complete. Finishing the most recent one
The remaining transaction had 10 elements left to run
--> Running transaction check
---> Package at.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 16:03 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:39:48 -0700
>> > T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'm surprised YUM didn't tell you to run "yum
On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 16:07 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> >Google indicates that there used to be a "package-cleanup"
> > argument to shut it up, but it doesn't seem to exist anymore. :-(
>
> $ rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/bin/package-cleanup
> yum-utils-1.1.28-1.fc14.noarch
Correct. package-cleanu
On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 16:03 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:39:48 -0700
> > T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> >
> >> I'm surprised YUM didn't tell you to run "yum-complete-transaction".
> >> I'd try running that first to s
If you've not done any more yum commands that change things
(installs/upgrades/removals), do:
yum history redo last
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:39:48 -0700
> T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>
>> I'm surprised YUM didn't tell you to run "yum-complete-transaction".
>> I'd try running that first to see if that can clear up your errors.
>
> As near as I can tell, yum only
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:39:48 -0700
T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> I'm surprised YUM didn't tell you to run "yum-complete-transaction".
> I'd try running that first to see if that can clear up your errors.
As near as I can tell, yum only prints the message about running
"yu-complete-transaction" when
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Deron Meranda wrote:
> Some more information,
>
> I did a "rpm --verify kernel-3.1.1-2.fc16.x86_64". All of the files
> seem to be okay and they all have the verify flags of "5S...",
> nothing else.
>
> As far as grub, the 3.1.1-2.fc16.x86_64 revision of the k
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Deron Meranda wrote:
> What are my next steps? If it was just a normal application package,
> I'd force a yum re-install. But since this happened during a kernel
> update, I don't want to risk messing my system up further.
I'm surprised YUM didn't tell you to run
Some more information,
I did a "rpm --verify kernel-3.1.1-2.fc16.x86_64". All of the files
seem to be okay and they all have the verify flags of "5S...",
nothing else.
As far as grub, the 3.1.1-2.fc16.x86_64 revision of the kernel is
listed in /boot/grub2/grub.cfg. However I'm still running
I'm running Fedora 16 and I attempted to install the most recent set
of released updates (from fedora-updates - I'm not using the testing
repo), using "yum update".
While it was installing the kernel package
(kernel-3.1.1-2.fc16.x86_64), the entire system locked up. It was
unresponsive to anything
20 matches
Mail list logo
