Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-14 Thread Greg Woods
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 23:09 +, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Greg Woods wrote: > > > Later versions of spamassassin for CentOS 5 can be obtained from the DAG > > repo (http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el5/en/) I installed version 3.3 from > > there and it works quite well on my CentOS 5 boxes. > > Thanks fo

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-14 Thread Kevin J. Cummings
On 01/14/2011 06:09 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Greg Woods wrote: > >> Later versions of spamassassin for CentOS 5 can be obtained from the DAG >> repo (http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el5/en/) I installed version 3.3 from >> there and it works quite well on my CentOS 5 boxes. > > Thanks for that. > Actu

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-14 Thread Timothy Murphy
Greg Woods wrote: > Later versions of spamassassin for CentOS 5 can be obtained from the DAG > repo (http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el5/en/) I installed version 3.3 from > there and it works quite well on my CentOS 5 boxes. Thanks for that. Actually, there didn't seem to be an RPM actually called spamas

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-14 Thread Greg Woods
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 00:08 +, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Now I have to confess that the server involved is running Centos-5.5, > not Fedora. Later versions of spamassassin for CentOS 5 can be obtained from the DAG repo (http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el5/en/) I installed version 3.3 from there and it

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-14 Thread Timothy Murphy
Mauriat Miranda wrote: >> Spamassassin has recently started assigning SPAM qualification >> to perfectly respectable email. >> What can I do about it? > This is what end up needing to do every 1-1.5 yrs on my mail server. > Take all of your incorrectly flagged email and put it into its own > fold

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Brian Mury
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 22:01 -0500, Genes MailLists wrote: > Its great to use procmail - however if spamassasin has tagged > something as spam - there is no point in running sa-learn --spam on the > what SA has already identified as spam - only use it on things it missed. Training a bayesian filt

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Genes MailLists
On 01/13/2011 09:38 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Then I have an entry sa-learn in /etc/cron.daily > - > #!/bin/sh > > /usr/bin/sa-learn --spam /home/tim/Maildir/.Spam/cur > /bin/rm -f /home/tim/Maildir/.Spam/cur/* > - > which runs sa-

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Timothy Murphy
Joe Zeff wrote: > Just out of curiosity, what email client are you using? I ask because > I'd like to get spamassassin working but I don't know how to integrate > it with what I have. I'm running dovecot, an IMAP server, on my desktop; then I'm using kmail on my laptop to read the mail. I'm not

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 17:06 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > If you're interested in spam filtering for email clients (rather > than > > servers) you may find Bogofilter easier to handle. I find it works > very > > well with Evolution. > > > > poc > > > > I find Spamassassin also works well with

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Timothy Murphy
Blake Hudson wrote: >> Thanks very much for your response, which helps greatly. >> >> I see that these messages lose a lot of points because >> 3.2 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future >> Not quite sure how that happened. > There was an error with the regex matching within this rul

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Kevin J. Cummings
On 01/13/2011 06:01 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 01/13/2011 02:55 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: >> You still didn't mention if you have control of your MDA or if >> Thunderbird is POPing or IMAPin email from elsewhere > > POP3. You could try using fetchmail to POP your email to a local store (fetc

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 16:59 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 12:44 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote: > > On 01/13/2011 12:31 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > > > But I'll study the documentation, > > > and see if I can get to the bottom of it. > > > > Just out of curiosity, what email cli

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Joe Zeff
On 01/13/2011 02:55 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > You still didn't mention if you have control of your MDA or if > Thunderbird is POPing or IMAPin email from elsewhere POP3. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedor

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Kevin J. Cummings
On 01/13/2011 05:19 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 01/13/2011 02:06 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: >> What do you have? > > Thunderbird. If possible, I'd like to have a KISS solution as it's just > for home use. You still didn't mention if you have control of your MDA or if Thunderbird is POPing or IMA

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 14:17 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 01/13/2011 01:29 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > If you're interested in spam filtering for email clients (rather than > > servers) you may find Bogofilter easier to handle. I find it works very > > well with Evolution. > > How does eithe

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Joe Zeff
On 01/13/2011 02:06 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > What do you have? Thunderbird. If possible, I'd like to have a KISS solution as it's just for home use. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Joe Zeff
On 01/13/2011 01:29 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > If you're interested in spam filtering for email clients (rather than > servers) you may find Bogofilter easier to handle. I find it works very > well with Evolution. How does either of them work with Thunderbird? -- users mailing list users@li

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Kevin J. Cummings
On 01/13/2011 03:44 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 01/13/2011 12:31 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> But I'll study the documentation, >> and see if I can get to the bottom of it. > > Just out of curiosity, what email client are you using? I ask because > I'd like to get spamassassin working but I don't k

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 12:44 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 01/13/2011 12:31 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > > But I'll study the documentation, > > and see if I can get to the bottom of it. > > Just out of curiosity, what email client are you using? I ask because > I'd like to get spamassassin working

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Blake Hudson
> Thanks very much for your response, which helps greatly. > > I see that these messages lose a lot of points because > 3.2 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future > Not quite sure how that happened. > > Actually, all my email, accepted or not, > has a warning about the time of

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Joe Zeff
On 01/13/2011 12:31 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > But I'll study the documentation, > and see if I can get to the bottom of it. Just out of curiosity, what email client are you using? I ask because I'd like to get spamassassin working but I don't know how to integrate it with what I have. -- use

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Timothy Murphy
Andrew Haley wrote: > On 01/13/2011 03:41 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> Spamassassin has recently started assigning SPAM qualification >> to perfectly respectable email. >> What can I do about it? > > Spamassassin tells you why it classified something in the headers. Thanks very much for your res

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Mauriat Miranda
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Spamassassin has recently started assigning SPAM qualification > to perfectly respectable email. > What can I do about it? > This is what end up needing to do every 1-1.5 yrs on my mail server. Take all of your incorrectly flagged email an

Re: Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Andrew Haley
On 01/13/2011 03:41 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Spamassassin has recently started assigning SPAM qualification > to perfectly respectable email. > What can I do about it? Spamassassin tells you why it classified something in the headers. X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0

Spamassassin behaving strangely

2011-01-13 Thread Timothy Murphy
Spamassassin has recently started assigning SPAM qualification to perfectly respectable email. What can I do about it? -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland -- users mailing lis