Fwd: [Undeliverable: [Not Resolved, sorry] Re: Fwd: [Undeliverable: Re: Mailing lists and Discourse]]

Wolfgang Pfeiffer writes: > Here we are again: because shortly after sending the message at the > very end of this forwarded message I got the message attached > below. > > One thing that y.antoniowat...@gmail.com (see below) I think y.antoniowatson is possibly a victim as well, because of

Fwd: [Undeliverable: [Not Resolved, sorry] Re: Fwd: [Undeliverable: Re: Mailing lists and Discourse]]

Here we are again: because shortly after sending the message at the very end of this forwarded message I got the message attached below. One thing that y.antoniowat...@gmail.com (see below) should know of: After this thread is over: all emails that are sent to me that *anywhere* contain this emai

sorry another test

My provider **seems** to have fixed the problem. This is a check. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/pr

Re: Oops sorry that was a mistake

It can be removed from the mailing list's archive, but it's already out there on people's mail servers. On September 21, 2019 7:10:31 PM UTC, Tony Su wrote: >Can that message be recalled or deleted ? -- Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse my brevity.__

Oops sorry that was a mistake

Can that message be recalled or deleted ? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ Li

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 10:57:46 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 12/12/2018 08:16 AM, Beartooth wrote: >> On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:15:49 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> >>> traceroute beartooth.info traceroute -I beartooth.info traceroute -T >>> -p 999 beartooth.info >>> >>> Some (or all) or those might requi

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On 12/12/2018 08:16 AM, Beartooth wrote: On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:15:49 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: traceroute beartooth.info traceroute -I beartooth.info traceroute -T -p 999 beartooth.info Some (or all) or those might require root, so best to just use root. [results snipped] All three fail af

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:15:49 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > traceroute beartooth.info > traceroute -I beartooth.info > traceroute -T -p 999 beartooth.info > > Some (or all) or those might require root, so best to just use root. [root@localhost ~]# traceroute beartooth.info traceroute to beartooth

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On 12/12/18 9:44 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > I will check again in a few hours, but I think the defense may drop after a > time. Yep, 1 hour later and "traceroute -n -T -p 999 beartooth.info" reaches 208.100.51.176. -- Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

Allegedly, on or about 11 December 2018, Joe Zeff sent: > If you can't ping someplace, traceroute will show you where the > problem is, because it will stop getting responses. Though you still have to think about it (it's only part of a diagnosis). That failure just means the device doesn't respo

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On 12/12/18 7:15 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > traceroute beartooth.info > traceroute -I beartooth.info > traceroute -T -p 999 beartooth.info > > Some (or all) or those might require root, so best to just use root. I was able to get the failure condition again.  This is from a working system [r

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On 12/11/18 2:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 12/12/18 6:12 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: >> On 12/11/18 1:52 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> >>> I get the feeling the folks at Netwisp, Inc. are doing something to >>> "prevent" hacking. >> Yup. Tried three times from our ASN from two different machines. All >>

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On 12/11/2018 04:04 PM, Beartooth wrote: Hoo, boy! I haven't so much as heard of traceroute in ten or fifteen years, and never did grep its uses. I can look it up, of course, but it might be worth your while to just tell me a command (and to use it as root if that should be desirable).

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On 12/11/18 3:04 PM, Beartooth wrote: Hoo, boy! I haven't so much as heard of traceroute in ten or fifteen years, and never did grep its uses. I can look it up, of course, but it might be worth your while to just tell me a command (and to use it as root if that should be desirable). tra

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 14:23:59 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 12/11/18 1:54 PM, Beartooth wrote: >> On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:53:03 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: >>> I can connect to that port fine. Do you have something like fail2ban >>> on the server that would block your connection? Can you try >>> co

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On 12/12/18 6:12 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 12/11/18 1:52 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> >> I get the feeling the folks at Netwisp, Inc. are doing something to >> "prevent" hacking. > Yup. Tried three times from our ASN from two different machines. All > the test machines are behind a firewall (Cisco

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On 12/11/18 1:54 PM, Beartooth wrote: On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:53:03 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: I can connect to that port fine. Do you have something like fail2ban on the server that would block your connection? Can you try connecting from another location? I thought I had fail2ban, bu

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On 12/11/18 1:52 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 12/12/18 5:25 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: >> I just did the same. From a Spectrum IP here in Orange County, CA, >> the system doesn't respond (and Spectrum is a Comcast company). >> >> From a monitoring system in our ASN (a /22 network), it works peachy: > >

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:53:03 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 12/11/18 12:11 PM, Beartooth wrote: >> ssh -v bearto...@beartooth.info -p 999 debug1: Connecting to >> beartooth.info [208.100.51.176] port 999. >> debug1: connect to address 208.100.51.176 port 999: Connection timed >> out ssh: connect t

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On 12/12/18 5:25 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: > I just did the same. From a Spectrum IP here in Orange County, CA, > the system doesn't respond (and Spectrum is a Comcast company). > > From a monitoring system in our ASN (a /22 network), it works peachy: Interesting Could you try it a second time?

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On 12/11/18 12:53 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 12/11/18 12:11 PM, Beartooth wrote: >> ssh -v bearto...@beartooth.info -p 999 >> debug1: Connecting to beartooth.info [208.100.51.176] port 999. >> debug1: connect to address 208.100.51.176 port 999: Connection timed out >> ssh: connect to host beartoot

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On 12/11/18 12:11 PM, Beartooth wrote: ssh -v bearto...@beartooth.info -p 999 debug1: Connecting to beartooth.info [208.100.51.176] port 999. debug1: connect to address 208.100.51.176 port 999: Connection timed out ssh: connect to host beartooth.info port 999: Connection timed out I can connect

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:59:20 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 12/11/18 11:04 AM, Beartooth wrote: >> We've been unable for days to connect to our email at my domain; >> when we try our usual ssh -p , we >> get nothing but eventually "Connection timed out" -- even after having >> left it all ni

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:53:03 -0700, stan wrote: > I think I understand better what is happening. Whether I can help I > don't know. A summary: > > You have no problem with your ISP (Comcast). Your problem is with the > third party that handles your private domain for email. When you try to >

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On 12/11/18 11:04 AM, Beartooth wrote: > On Sun, 09 Dec 2018 15:27:32 -0700, stan wrote: > >> On Sun, 9 Dec 2018 19:00:25 + (UTC) >> I Beartooth wrote: >> >>> I do some of my email and all of my Gmane activity (including >>> this list) at the address above, from my local access provider,

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On 12/11/18 11:04 AM, Beartooth wrote: We've been unable for days to connect to our email at my domain; when we try our usual ssh -p , we get nothing but eventually "Connection timed out" -- even after having left it all night. How are you using ssh to get your email? What port are you us

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 19:04:17 + (UTC) Beartooth wrote: > According to them, my own firewall cuts us (i.e., our whole IP) > off when we try too many times too soon to connect. (We do that, of > course, by hitting up arrow and Enter.) > > Am I making any more sense yet? I think I un

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On Sun, 09 Dec 2018 15:27:32 -0700, stan wrote: > On Sun, 9 Dec 2018 19:00:25 + (UTC) > I Beartooth wrote: > >> I do some of my email and all of my Gmane activity (including >> this list) at the address above, from my local access provider, >> Comcast; but I do most of my email (and my

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On Sun, 9 Dec 2018 19:00:25 + (UTC) Beartooth wrote: > I do some of my email and all of my Gmane activity (including > this list) at the address above, from my local access provider, > Comcast; but I do most of my email (and my wife does all of hers) at > my own domain, to which we con

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On 12/9/18 11:00 AM, Beartooth wrote: Recently we've been moving machines about physically, from floor to floor and connection to connection. We've also been getting lots of timeouts. When I asked my domain host about it, he told me it was my own firewall cutting us off. It blocks connec

Re: F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

On 12/09/2018 12:00 PM, Beartooth wrote: I do some of my email and all of my Gmane activity (including this list) at the address above, from my local access provider, Comcast; but I do most of my email (and my wife does all of hers) at my own domain, to which we connect by ssh. My main

F29 Wail at the Firewall (long; sorry!)

In the words of the starlet, I try to be cynical [read paranoid] about security, but I just can't keep up. I do some of my email and all of my Gmane activity (including this list) at the address above, from my local access provider, Comcast; but I do most of my email (and my wi

Re: Hundreds of kernel crash messages after Fedora 26 upgrade. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed.

On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 03:46:17 - "Sudhir Khanger" wrote: > Hi, > > I installed Ubuntu LTS because I can't have my system breaking every > six months. I had already wasted 24 hours and I couldn't waste > anymore. Thank you so much for your help. Yeah, you're probably not a good fit for Fedora.

Re: Hundreds of kernel crash messages after Fedora 26 upgrade. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed.

Hi, I installed Ubuntu LTS because I can't have my system breaking every six months. I had already wasted 24 hours and I couldn't waste anymore. Thank you so much for your help. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe sen

Re: Hundreds of kernel crash messages after Fedora 26 upgrade. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed.

On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 13:28:54 -0400 Tom Horsley wrote: > I'd almost wonder if there was only one actual crash, and > abrt keeps telling you about the same one over and over again > because it failed to record that it already told you. That > would explain why running a new kernel still keeps repor

Re: Hundreds of kernel crash messages after Fedora 26 upgrade. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed.

On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 10:04:45 -0700 stan wrote: > I know little about abrt, and why it would be generating these oops, > and why it isn't paying attention to its configuration file settings. I'd almost wonder if there was only one actual crash, and abrt keeps telling you about the same one over an

Re: Hundreds of kernel crash messages after Fedora 26 upgrade. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed.

On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 04:18:07 - "Sudhir Khanger" wrote: > I just installed 4.11.10-300.fc26.x86_64. And the problem continues. > > I am getting the following messages every second. > > We're sorry, it looks like > BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86

Re: Hundreds of kernel crash messages after Fedora 26 upgrade. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed.

Sudhir Khanger wrote: >I restarted the system. And also tried restarting abrtd. In that case I'm out of ideas. Sorry, Ron ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Hundreds of kernel crash messages after Fedora 26 upgrade. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed.

Hi Ron, I restarted the system. And also tried restarting abrtd. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Hundreds of kernel crash messages after Fedora 26 upgrade. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed.

Sudhir Khanger wrote: >That didn't help. I am continuing to see the abrt notification. Did you restart abrtd? systemctl restart abrtd Ron ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedor

Re: Hundreds of kernel crash messages after Fedora 26 upgrade. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed.

Hi, >DropNotReportableOopses = yes That didn't help. I am continuing to see the abrt notification. I have so far 10,000 entries in the ABRT window. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@list

Re: Hundreds of kernel crash messages after Fedora 26 upgrade. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed.

Sudhir Khanger wrote: >Jul 15 10:35:05 workstation abrt-dump-journal-oops[1256]: Reported 2 kernel >oopses to Abrt >Jul 15 10:35:06 workstation abrt-server[5959]: Can't find a meaningful >backtrace for hashing in '.' >Jul 15 10:35:06 workstation abrt-server[5959]: Option >'DropNotReportableOopse

Re: Hundreds of kernel crash messages after Fedora 26 upgrade. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed.

Hi, I have just rebuilt the boot images after running the following command. dracut --regenerate-all --force Let's see how long it works. I have 6000+ unreportable errors in the ABRT window. Still no luck. Jul 15 10:35:05 workstation abrt-dump-journal-oops[1256]: Reported 2 kernel oopses to

Re: Hundreds of kernel crash messages after Fedora 26 upgrade. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed.

On 07/14/2017 09:18 PM, Sudhir Khanger wrote: I am getting the following messages every second. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed. Please contact the developer if you want to report the issue. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/bo

Re: Hundreds of kernel crash messages after Fedora 26 upgrade. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed.

Hi, Thanks for your reply. I just installed 4.11.10-300.fc26.x86_64. And the problem continues. I am getting the following messages every second. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed. Please contact the developer if you want to report the

Re: Hundreds of kernel crash messages after Fedora 26 upgrade. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed.

On 07/14/2017 08:19 AM, Sudhir Khanger wrote: I have been getting these messages on my system every second after upgrading from Fedora 25 to Fedora 26 Plasma Desktop. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed. I already have 1000 of reports t

Re: Hundreds of kernel crash messages after Fedora 26 upgrade. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed.

On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:19:41 - "Sudhir Khanger" wrote: > I have been getting these messages on my system every second after > upgrading from Fedora 25 to Fedora 26 Plasma Desktop. > > We're sorry, it looks like > BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_6

Hundreds of kernel crash messages after Fedora 26 upgrade. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed.

Hello, I have been getting these messages on my system every second after upgrading from Fedora 25 to Fedora 26 Plasma Desktop. We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed. I already have 1000 of reports that I can't submit. How do I

Re: Gonna be a little irritating again Sorry

On 05/12/2015 05:43 AM, Richard Z wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 01:20:59AM -0500, g wrote: >> On 05/11/2015 09:12 AM, Glenn Holmer wrote: >> <<>> >>> Digital clock. The problem this causes for me is that if I add the >>> short date display, the clock becomes too small unless I make the >>> pan

Re: 8 Things Mainstream Media Doesn't Have the Courage to Tell You | Alternet - Sorry

On 2014-04-07 12:59, David wrote: On 4/7/2014 2:15 PM, David wrote: My bad for this. Sent to the wrong address. Thanks for the link. I was sent t

Re: 8 Things Mainstream Media Doesn't Have the Courage to Tell You | Alternet - Sorry

On 4/7/2014 2:15 PM, David wrote: > > My bad for this. Sent to the wrong address. -- David -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To uns

OT; Sorry about sending multiple messages

I'm terribly sorry about spamming the list. Was composing a message in claws mail and got interrupted several times. Don't know how it happened but the mailer apparently sent out a bunch of partial messages. Have to check settings...been using it long time without trouble??? Sending

(sorry, txt only version) Problem with brand new Dell Precision R7610 workstation and Fedora 19

Hi all, I've been asked to set up a Dell R7610 workstation dual booting windows 8 and Fedora 19. The machine in question has a Xeon E5-2687W with 20MB L2, 128 Gig of ram, and 4 x 10k hard disk which I've put into a stiped RAID 0 array using the onboard "Integrated: LSI 2308 6Gb/s SATA, SAS cont

Sorry!

People, Sorry about the previous post of the whole of the last issue - I was going to respond to something and then changed my mind and then hit the wrong button . . Regards, Phil. -- Philip Rhoades GPO Box 3411 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au -- users mailing

Re: /etc/sysconfig/desktop (sorry not the right thread just do not read the previous message and this one)

On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Adam Tong wrote: > > > > > - Original Message > From: Adam Tong > To: Community support for Fedora users > Sent: Sat, June 4, 2011 1:25:34 PM > Subject: Re: /etc/sysconfig/desktop > > Hi, > > you are right. HEre the new output: > > - > # yum list ker

Re: /etc/sysconfig/desktop (sorry not the right thread just do not read the previous message and this one)

- Original Message From: Adam Tong To: Community support for Fedora users Sent: Sat, June 4, 2011 1:25:34 PM Subject: Re: /etc/sysconfig/desktop Hi, you are right. HEre the new output: - # yum list kernel* Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit adobe-linux-i386

Re: non-fedora:octave-question(sorry)

Thank you Alessandro. l'll do that :) On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Alessandro Brezzi < alessandro.bre...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/5/31 Nermin Celik > >> hi, >> >> firstly apologies to all members for asking a non-fedora question here... >> >> i'm a newbie to octave and would like to plot a b

Re: non-fedora:octave-question(sorry)

2011/5/31 Nermin Celik > hi, > > firstly apologies to all members for asking a non-fedora question here... > > i'm a newbie to octave and would like to plot a bar/frequency graph. > however experiencing > some problems due to my data. > ... nc > Hi Nemim, you can subscribe to the octave specifi

non-fedora:octave-question(sorry)

hi, firstly apologies to all members for asking a non-fedora question here... i'm a newbie to octave and would like to plot a bar/frequency graph. however experiencing some problems due to my data. x-values y-values --- -- [1-9] 9 [10-19]

Re: Sorry for the extraneous post

On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 00:54 -0500, Mike Williams wrote: > On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan > wrote: > > > On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 19:52 -0800, Jared H. Johnson Jr. wrote: > > > I have the option to receive my own posts set to true, and yet I am not? > > > Just wondering if th

Re: Sorry for the extraneous post

On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 19:52 -0800, Jared H. Johnson Jr. wrote: > > I have the option to receive my own posts set to true, and yet I am not? > > Just wondering if there is a delay on the list mailer, and if so how > > long so I may ke

Re: Sorry for the extraneous post

On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 19:52 -0800, Jared H. Johnson Jr. wrote: > I have the option to receive my own posts set to true, and yet I am not? > Just wondering if there is a delay on the list mailer, and if so how > long so I may keep waiting:) You appear to be sending from Gmail. Gmail filters your

Sorry for the extraneous post

I have the option to receive my own posts set to true, and yet I am not? Just wondering if there is a delay on the list mailer, and if so how long so I may keep waiting:) Jared -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedora

Re: lvm extent size (sorry for modem troubles) :(

fedora above 11 ! Should I send an email to linuxant.com ? Thank. Patrick, It is me, Antonio, from fedora list, users@lists.fedoraproject.org, I am sorry That the driver(Conexant modem from linuxant did not work out for you ).  I apologize :(, if it was another modem, I am sure that I would have

Re: lvm extent size (sorry for modem troubles) :(

Patrick, It is me, Antonio, from fedora list, users@lists.fedoraproject.org, I am sorry That the driver(Conexant modem from linuxant did not work out for you ).  I apologize :(, if it was another modem, I am sure that I would have guided you better.  I am sorry for not replying back to you

Re: Spam in 'Unmatched' folder - [SORRY WRONG LIST]

On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 15:22 -0400, William Case wrote: > Hi; > > Just virgin installed Fedora 13 with Evolution 2.20.3 upgrade. > Bogofilter s on. Spam in 'Unmatched' folder no longer being removed > when marked junk. A copy then appears in Junk folder. Deleting the spam > in 'Unmatched' deletes

Re: word processor/article referencing (non-fedora question-sorry)

Thank you. On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 11:19 +1000, Nermin Celik wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to ask a non-fedora related question - apologies for > > this... > > > > I was just wondering what word processor you use on a Unix system,

Re: word processor/article referencing (non-fedora question-sorry)

On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 22:14 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 11:19 +1000, Nermin Celik wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to ask a non-fedora related question - apologies for > > this... > > > > I was just wondering what word processor you use on a Unix system, > > other

Re: word processor/article referencing (non-fedora question-sorry)

On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 11:19 +1000, Nermin Celik wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to ask a non-fedora related question - apologies for > this... > > I was just wondering what word processor you use on a Unix system, > other than vi/gvim, a program that allows article > references/bibliography. > > I

word processor/article referencing (non-fedora question-sorry)

Hi, I would like to ask a non-fedora related question - apologies for this... I was just wondering what word processor you use on a Unix system, other than vi/gvim, a program that allows article references/bibliography. I'm using OpenOffice and Bibus for article referencing however bibus crashes