On 12/10/2014 11:41 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Dec 9, 2014 6:44 PM, "Robert Moskowitz" <mailto:r...@htt-consult.com>> wrote:
> So what is the story? Does Fedora work for a Samba AD?
As others have mentioned, not presently.
But if you're adventurous:
ht
On Dec 9, 2014 6:44 PM, "Robert Moskowitz" wrote:
> So what is the story? Does Fedora work for a Samba AD?
As others have mentioned, not presently.
But if you're adventurous:
http://negativo17.org/samba-4-active-directory-with-bind-dlz-zones-dynamic-dns-updates-windows-s
On 12/10/2014 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
On 10 December 2014 at 08:38, wrote:
Indeed,
At FOSDEM, two years ago (or is it already three) at de samba-devroom they say
that with samba4 you could do a seamless switch from Microsoft-AD to samba4,
and back.
All major distro's fail to do so,
On 10 December 2014 at 08:38, wrote:
> Indeed,
>
> At FOSDEM, two years ago (or is it already three) at de samba-devroom they
> say that with samba4 you could do a seamless switch from Microsoft-AD to
> samba4, and back.
> All major distro's fail to do so, because of the HEIMDAL / MIT issue ..
lt to solve than the transition to
system.
Hw
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Robert Moskowitz
Sent: woensdag 10 december 2014 2:43
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Samba 4 support
On 2014-12-09 19:53, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/09/2014 06:47 PM, Robin Laing wrote:
On 2014-12-09 18:43, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I was asking about Samba 4 on the Samba list and got the following
response about Fedora and Samba4:
"If you look thru previous posts to this forum you
On 12/09/2014 06:47 PM, Robin Laing wrote:
On 2014-12-09 18:43, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I was asking about Samba 4 on the Samba list and got the following
response about Fedora and Samba4:
"If you look thru previous posts to this forum you will see that Samba 4
uses Heimdal Kerberos libr
On 2014-12-09 18:43, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I was asking about Samba 4 on the Samba list and got the following
response about Fedora and Samba4:
"If you look thru previous posts to this forum you will see that Samba 4
uses Heimdal Kerberos libraries , while Fedora uses MIT kerberos
libr
I was asking about Samba 4 on the Samba list and got the following
response about Fedora and Samba4:
"If you look thru previous posts to this forum you will see that Samba 4
uses Heimdal Kerberos libraries , while Fedora uses MIT kerberos
libraries, so you need to recompile Samba 4
Hi there,
[Sorry for cross-posting, I hope I didn't violated any list policies]
this is just a heads-up that SerNet does provide Samba 4 packages
(including AD DC package) now.
It was told on the fedora user's list that the kerberos implementation
used by Fedora, RHEL and CentOS
On 03/28/2013 02:23 PM, Gabriel VLASIU wrote:
> Unfortunately, no. :-(
It seems the samba manual is not telling the truth or there are defaults
set that the manual has not been updated to display.
I fixed this by setting the following variable:
force create mode = 0775
You may also need to use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> I'm running into the same thing. Did you figure anything out?
Unfortunately, no. :-(
Gabriel
- --
// Gabriel VLASIU
//
// OpenGPG-KeyID : 44952F15
// OpenGPG-Fingerprint: 4AC5 7C26 2FE9 02D
On 01/31/2013 08:10 AM, Gabriel VLASIU wrote:
> The important thing here is "create mask". I do not want all files created
> by users to be executable in linux.
>
> The same definition work in samba 4 with the exception of running windoze
> .exe files from the share. In
Am 20.02.2013 21:18, schrieb Shelby:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Samba4
>
> Seems a bit conflicting as it was stated somewhere in the release that Fedora
> 18 and Samba 4 could be used as a DC.
not if you read it really
Samba 4 AD DC functionality relies heavil
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Samba4
Seems a bit conflicting as it was stated somewhere in the release that Fedora
18 and Samba 4 could be used as a DC.
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On
MIT Kerberos 5 Support
===
Fedora is using MIT Kerberos implementation as its Kerberos infrastructure
of
choice. The Samba build in Fedora is using MIT Kerberos implementation in
order
to allow system-wide interoperability between both desktop and server
applications running on
Samba4 on fedora don't support Domain Control setup, here you can read
about this:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/MIT_KDC
2013/2/20 Pedro Silva
> 2013/2/20 Reindl Harald :
> >
> >
> > Am 20.02.2013 20:29, schrieb Pedro Silva:
> >> In fedora 18 installed package "samba" and then try to
2013/2/20 Reindl Harald :
>
>
> Am 20.02.2013 20:29, schrieb Pedro Silva:
>> In fedora 18 installed package "samba" and then try to find the command
>> installed "samba-tool" and not against. The
>> samba in fedora does not have this command?
>
> what is the command supposed to do?
>
> i am using
Am 20.02.2013 20:29, schrieb Pedro Silva:
> In fedora 18 installed package "samba" and then try to find the command
> installed "samba-tool" and not against. The
> samba in fedora does not have this command?
what is the command supposed to do?
i am using samba since many years including now
sa
Hi all,
In fedora 18 installed package "samba" and then try to find the command
installed "samba-tool" and not against. The samba in fedora does not have this
command?
Thanks
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorapr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi!
Maybe someone can help me with samba 4 (F18).
In previous version (samba 3/F17) I had this definition for a share:
[xxx]
path = /xxx
browseable = yes
writable = yes
; writable = no
printable = no
ry-10017931/ and it looks really promising. I
> wonder what is the difference between this project (389DS) and samba 4 which
> is also coming up with active directory support and this too will be an
> alternative for MS-AD.
>
> Can you please focus on this and if someone is really
tween this project (389DS) and samba 4 which
is also coming up with active directory support and this too will be an
alternative for MS-AD.
Can you please focus on this and if someone is really looking for an open
source alternative for AD then which will be a better choice 389DS or Samba?
Regar
23 matches
Mail list logo
