Re: SELinux: Proof of tty

2011-12-02 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/02/2011 01:59 AM, Jitesh Shah wrote: >> I >>> >> would probably hack up sudo to run a shell that checks to make >> sure the user is local, I guess on a /dev/tty rather then on a >> pseudo tty. > > aah I see. Makes sense. Thanks! > > Jitesh Als

Re: SELinux: Proof of tty

2011-12-01 Thread Jitesh Shah
> I >> > would probably hack up sudo to run a shell that checks to make sure > the user is local, I guess on a /dev/tty rather then on a pseudo tty. aah I see. Makes sense. Thanks! Jitesh -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://a

Re: SELinux: Proof of tty

2011-12-01 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/30/2011 07:20 PM, Jitesh Shah wrote: > Hello list, For one of my projects, I am trying to learn the > internals of SELinux. To start with, I am trying to build a > minimalistic system where each domain is confined in its own domain > (With Fedora

SELinux: Proof of tty

2011-11-30 Thread Jitesh Shah
Hello list, For one of my projects, I am trying to learn the internals of SELinux. To start with, I am trying to build a minimalistic system where each domain is confined in its own domain (With Fedora's targeted policy as a base). One of my aims is to remove the unconfined domain totally. It woul