On 05/11/2016 08:51 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Virtually every security measure is a partial solution. There are no
magic bullets. However just because a given measure is weak on its own
doesn't mean it isn't useful in combination with others. Using a non-
root user for remote login means th
On Wed, 2016-05-11 at 10:07 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 01:30:48 -0700,
> Joe Zeff wrote:
> >
> >
> > Excellent advice. Linux never tells you if the username you're
> > trying
> > to log in with is right, just that the combination of username and
> > password was
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 01:30:48 -0700,
Joe Zeff wrote:
Excellent advice. Linux never tells you if the username you're trying
to log in with is right, just that the combination of username and
password was wrong. The only username that a potential cracker knows
exists is root, so if you a
Allegedly, on or about 10 May 2016, Patrick O'Callaghan sent:
> Much more important is to keep tight control of logins
> from outside your network. Only allow SSH, don't allow it to the root
> account, only allow it using token (not password) access, and run
> fail2ban.
If you run externally acce
On 05/10/2016 01:03 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Much more important is to keep tight control of logins
from outside your network. Only allow SSH, don't allow it to the root
account, only allow it using token (not password) access, and run
fail2ban.
Excellent advice. Linux never tells you if
On Mon, 2016-05-09 at 16:11 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > Linux is a bit more impervious to the nefarious actions of the evil
> > hackers out there than MacOS and a lot more so that Winblows, but
> it
> > isn't perfect. If you're surfing the web, wear a full-body condom
> or
> > two. And always rem
On 05/09/2016 03:52 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 05/09/2016 12:19 PM, CS DBA wrote:
1) If I want to use the plugin package:
you must turn off SELinux controls on the Firefox plugins.
# setsebool -P unconfined_mozilla_plugin_transition 0
I wouldn't go so far as to reinstall. SELinux has blocked
On 05/09/2016 03:30 PM, CS DBA wrote:
On 05/09/2016 01:39 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 05/09/2016 12:19 PM, CS DBA wrote:
Hi All;
I'm running Fedora 23 KDE Spin, After a recent firefox update (I'm now
at Firefox 46.0.1) I've been getting these SELINUX alerts:
The source process: 57656220436F
On 05/09/2016 04:36 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 05/09/2016 12:19 PM, CS DBA wrote:
Thoughts? Is this a bug? Should I run the setsebool command to allow
access?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230052
What plugins do you have installed? Flash?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fed
On 05/09/2016 12:19 PM, CS DBA wrote:
Thoughts? Is this a bug? Should I run the setsebool command to allow
access?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230052
What plugins do you have installed? Flash?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscr
On 05/09/2016 01:39 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 05/09/2016 12:19 PM, CS DBA wrote:
Hi All;
I'm running Fedora 23 KDE Spin, After a recent firefox update (I'm now
at Firefox 46.0.1) I've been getting these SELINUX alerts:
The source process: 57656220436F6E74656E74
Attempted this access: crea
On 05/09/2016 12:19 PM, CS DBA wrote:
Hi All;
I'm running Fedora 23 KDE Spin, After a recent firefox update (I'm now
at Firefox 46.0.1) I've been getting these SELINUX alerts:
The source process: 57656220436F6E74656E74
Attempted this access: create
On this rawip_socket:
The alert gives me 2
Hi All;
I'm running Fedora 23 KDE Spin, After a recent firefox update (I'm now
at Firefox 46.0.1) I've been getting these SELINUX alerts:
The source process: 57656220436F6E74656E74
Attempted this access: create
On this rawip_socket:
The alert gives me 2 choices:
1) If I want to use the pl
13 matches
Mail list logo
