Re: Routing problems (Solved)

2011-08-27 Thread Mike Dwiggins
Thanks, that helped but was not my problem. The problem was a classic Forest for the Trees syndrome. It helps to turn on Routing and Forwarding! Yep I can be a DUMMY! On 8/19/2011 1:53 AM, François Patte wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Le 19/08/2011 10:34, Mike D

Re: Routing problems

2011-08-19 Thread François Patte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 19/08/2011 10:34, Mike Dwiggins a écrit : > I am trying to set up a Fedora 14 as a router between two different net > works. look there: http://www.frozentux.net/iptables-tutorial/iptables-tutorial.html you have example of what you want to do at

Routing problems

2011-08-19 Thread Mike Dwiggins
I am trying to set up a Fedora 14 as a router between two different net works. I have the following iptables set up: [root@faker ~]# iptables -A INPUT --source 10.21.144.0/24 --destination 10.16.2.1 [root@faker ~]# iptables -A INPUT --source 10.16.2.0/24 --destination 10.21.144.1 [root@fa

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-21 Thread j . halifax .
t.ipv6.conf.eth0.mc_forwarding = 0 net.ipv6.conf.eth3.forwarding = 0 net.ipv6.conf.eth3.mc_forwarding = 0 === net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1. Is it sufficient? Thank you... > Původní zpráva > Od: Bruno Wolff III > Předmět: Re: Routing problems &g

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-20 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 07:31:56 +0100, "j.halifax ." wrote: > > >From the LAN default GW (10.255.250.37) > - I can ping 172.17.1.50: >   PING 172.17.1.50 (172.17.1.50) 56(84) bytes of data. >   64 bytes from 172.17.1.50: icmp_seq=1 ttl=253 time=5.62 ms >   64 bytes from 172.17.1.50: icmp_seq=

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-19 Thread Rick Sewill
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 09:43 +0100, j.halifax . wrote: > > ip rule list > ip rule list > 0: from all lookup local > 32766: from all lookup main > 32767: from all lookup default > > > ip route list table local > > ip route list table main > > ip route list table defau

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-19 Thread j . halifax .
and goes by default to eth0 (Internet) Don't you know any way of debugging routing decisions (to see why do packets match or not)? Thank you again. :) jh > Původní zpráva > Od: Rick Sewill > Předmět: Re: Routing

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-18 Thread Rick Sewill
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 04:31 +0100, j.halifax . wrote: > > What happens if you try to "ping" from the eth2 interface of the router? > > ping -I 10.255.250.37 172.17.1.50 > > Commands issued in 10.255.l250.37 (via ssh 195.39.130.92): > = > ping -I 10.255.

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-18 Thread j . halifax .
-- > Od: Rick Sewill > Předmět: Re: Routing problems > Datum: 18.2.2010 20:10:40 > > On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 13:48 +0100, j.halifax . wrote: > > > I think the problem is probably the routing tables in the other boxes > >

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-18 Thread Rick Sewill
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 13:48 +0100, j.halifax . wrote: > > I think the problem is probably the routing tables in the other boxes > > in the same LAN (e.g. 10.255.250.38) > > route in 10.255.250.38: > Destination Gateway GenmaskFlags Metric RefUse Iface > 192.168.122.0 * 255.255.2

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-18 Thread j . halifax .
ní zpráva > Od: Andrew Haley > Předmět: Re: Routing problems > Datum: 18.2.2010 13:08:00 > > On 02/18/2010 11:56 AM, j.halifax . wrote: > >> Please post > >> * Full details of your network > >> * T

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-18 Thread Andrew Haley
0 > TX packets:255570 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > RX bytes:25105805 (23.9 MiB) TX bytes:25105805 (23.9 MiB) > > Thanx. :) > > >> Povodní zpráva >> Od: Andrew Haley >> P

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-18 Thread j . halifax .
--- > Od: Andrew Haley > Předmět: Re: Routing problems > Datum: 18.2.2010 12:31:34 > > On 02/18/2010 11:19 AM, j.halifax . wrote: > >> What is the address of the subnet "other LAN" ? > >> There seem to be two

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-18 Thread Andrew Haley
vodní zpráva ---- >> Od: Andrew Haley >> Předmět: Re: Routing problems >> Datum: 18.2.2010 11:51:17 >> >> On 02/18/2010 10:01 AM, Rick Sewill wrote: >>> On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 07:31 +0100, j.halifax . wrote: &g

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-18 Thread j . halifax .
.0192.168.180.100 255.255.0.0UG 000 eth3 192.168.0.0 192.168.180.100 255.255.0.0UG 000 eth3. Thank you for help! > Původní zpráva > Od: Andrew Haley > Předmět: Re: Routing problems > Datum: 18.2.2010 11:51:17 > ---

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-18 Thread j . halifax .
-- > Od: Rick Sewill > Předmět: Re: Routing problems > Datum: 18.2.2010 11:03:31 > > On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 07:31 +0100, j.halifax . wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Could you please help me with routing in the LAN de

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-18 Thread Andrew Haley
On 02/18/2010 10:01 AM, Rick Sewill wrote: > On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 07:31 +0100, j.halifax . wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Could you please help me with routing in the LAN default GW box? >> >> I have >> eth0 connected to Internet >> eth2 to internal LAN 10.255.250.0 >> LAN default GW is 10.255.250.37

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-18 Thread Rick Sewill
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 07:31 +0100, j.halifax . wrote: > Hi All, > > Could you please help me with routing in the LAN default GW box? > > I have > eth0 connected to Internet > eth2 to internal LAN 10.255.250.0 > LAN default GW is 10.255.250.37 > eth3 connected to other LAN > > Route in the de

Routing problems

2010-02-17 Thread j . halifax .
Hi All, Could you please help me with routing in the LAN default GW box? I have eth0 connected to Internet eth2 to internal LAN 10.255.250.0 LAN default GW is 10.255.250.37 eth3 connected to other LAN Route in the default GW (10.255.250.37): Destination Gateway Genmask