> > Ah ... could well be ... maybe its time for a re-dongle :-)
>
> My next step is finding the digital thermometer we have around
> here somewhere and measuring the temp on f14 compared to f15 :-).
Since the kernel update a day or two ago, this wi-fi dongle has
started working perfectly again
Tom Horsley gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> Here's ip route:
>
> 10.134.30.0/24 dev em1 proto kernel scope link src 10.134.30.143
> 192.168.9.0/24 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.9.1
> 169.254.0.0/16 dev em1 scope link metric 1002
> default via 10.134.30.196 dev em1
> ...
I
> If you blacklist ipv6 (which I tried) then some installed software,
> and some interfaces will belch out error messages, such as:
>
> May 26 21:13:19 localhost kernel: bridge: Unknown symbol
> ipv6_dev_get_saddr (err 0)
>
>
> You might want to look at
>
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifdown-ipv
On 06/01/11 12:17, Alan J. Gagne wrote:
>> My next step is finding the digital thermometer we have around
>> here somewhere and measuring the temp on f14 compared to f15 :-).
> Would that be oral or otherwise?
> Seems otherwise might be appropriate given the level of fun
> this release has provided
> My next step is finding the digital thermometer we have around
> here somewhere and measuring the temp on f14 compared to f15 :-).
Would that be oral or otherwise?
Seems otherwise might be appropriate given the level of fun
this release has provided the users.
Alan
--
users mailing list
users@
On 06/01/11 10:49, Genes MailLists wrote:
>
>> ifconfig says:
>>
>> em1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1E:4F:9A:D6:E5
>>inet addr:10.134.30.143 Bcast:10.134.30.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>>inet6 addr: fe80::21e:4fff:fe9a:d6e5/64 Scope:Link
> ipv6 looks on to me ..
I
On 06/01/2011 02:39 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:31:21 -0400
> Genes MailLists wrote:
>
>> Ah ... could well be ... maybe its time for a re-dongle :-)
>
> My next step is finding the digital thermometer we have around
> here somewhere and measuring the temp on f14 compared to
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:31:21 -0400
Genes MailLists wrote:
> Ah ... could well be ... maybe its time for a re-dongle :-)
My next step is finding the digital thermometer we have around
here somewhere and measuring the temp on f14 compared to f15 :-).
Thanks for all the help.
--
users mailing li
On 06/01/2011 02:21 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Actually, in the flaky behavior department, I just tried booting f15
> one more time, and this time everything started working when I ran
> the script. I think the fact that it sometimes works says I'm probably
> doing routing correctly, but some other r
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:49:30 -0400
Genes MailLists wrote:
> > I'm starting to wonder if the ralink driver it is using is
> > just flaky on f15.
>
>Possible - I think I'd try turning off IPV6 first .. to make sure its
> not interfering in some way .. probably not but might not hurt to test t
On 06/01/2011 12:32 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:07:54 -0400
>
> ifconfig says:
>
> em1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1E:4F:9A:D6:E5
> inet addr:10.134.30.143 Bcast:10.134.30.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> inet6 addr: fe80::21e:4fff:fe9a:d6e5/64 Scope:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:23:04 -0400
Genes MailLists wrote:
> Ok - and the hostapd is the fedora F15 version installed via yum?
Yep, that's the one I normally use. I also tried building from
the latest source on the hostapd home page, but got the same
results.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.f
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:07:54 -0400
Genes MailLists wrote:
> In the meantime can you provide the outputs of what I suggested
> previously for the F15 system. Are you seeing any AVC's by the way ?
I got the info from f15, but I also found when I rebooted
that the wi-fi on the phone couldn't connec
On 06/01/2011 11:24 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:07:54 -0400
> Genes MailLists wrote:
>
>> I'll try and go over what you did - unfortunately, I am totally
>> unfamiliar with hostapd or why you need it (is it related to your dongle
>> somehow ?) and how it interacts with other p
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:07:54 -0400
Genes MailLists wrote:
> I'll try and go over what you did - unfortunately, I am totally
> unfamiliar with hostapd or why you need it (is it related to your dongle
> somehow ?) and how it interacts with other parts of
> firewall/routing/networking.
That's what
On 06/01/2011 10:46 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:25:27 -0400
>
> Most of the info about what I'm doing is described here:
>
> http://home.comcast.net/~tomhorsley/hardware/rtl8192cu/rtl8192cu.html#Success
>
> This works great under fedora 14, but my phone can't talk
> to anythi
On 06/01/2011 10:02 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2011 09:29:09 -0400
> Tom Horsley wrote:
>
>
> At this point I'm tempted to change the name of
> the interface back to eth0 from the new em1 name
> it gets in f15 just to see if maybe someone has
> an eth0 hard coded somewhere :-).
>
>
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:25:27 -0400
Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 06/01/2011 10:02 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 May 2011 09:29:09 -0400
> > Tom Horsley wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > Anyone have any pointers for debugging routing?
> > Anyone know of something that maybe changed in
> > this vicinity
On 06/01/2011 10:02 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2011 09:29:09 -0400
> Tom Horsley wrote:
>
>
> Anyone have any pointers for debugging routing?
> Anyone know of something that maybe changed in
> this vicinity in f15?
One quick question - did you change your iptables rules to use the
On Tue, 31 May 2011 09:29:09 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
> I haven't been able to get my USB wi-fi dongle working
> as an access point in f15 while doing all the exact same
> things I did in f14 (where it works perfectly).
Well, I finally got a change to try this, and nothing
I do to rp_filter (whic
On Tue, 31 May 2011 09:41:53 -0400
Genes MailLists wrote:
> Usually its fine (correct) to leave rp_filter on - be thoughtful if
> you're doing something funky with routing tables.
I never know what I'm doing with networking :-). I just
find prescriptions in google and try them, never
managing t
On 05/31/2011 09:29 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2011 14:17:44 +0100
> Dan Track wrote:
>
>> Just for future reference I figured out the problem. You need to run
>> on rp_filter on the interfaces you wish to include in the routing
>> process.
>
> What exactly does that mean, and how do
On Tue, 31 May 2011 14:17:44 +0100
Dan Track wrote:
> Just for future reference I figured out the problem. You need to run
> on rp_filter on the interfaces you wish to include in the routing
> process.
What exactly does that mean, and how do I do it? I've never
heard of it before, but it could ea
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Dan Track wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:48 AM, fedora wrote:
>> echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>>
>> suomi
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Forgot to mention, that's already done.
>
> cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> 1
>
> Any other thoughts on this?
>
> Thanks
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:48 AM, fedora wrote:
> echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>
> suomi
Thanks,
Forgot to mention, that's already done.
cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
1
Any other thoughts on this?
Thanks
Dan
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe o
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
suomi
On 2011-05-31 09:34, Dan Track wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a server where I've got two interfaces (vlan 200 and vlan
> 300). If I get traffic coming into vlan 200 but sourced from a network
> that vlan 200 subnet doesn't know about, the server should s
Hi,
I've got a server where I've got two interfaces (vlan 200 and vlan
300). If I get traffic coming into vlan 200 but sourced from a network
that vlan 200 subnet doesn't know about, the server should send the
traffic out of it's default gateway i.e. vlan 300, but this isn't
happening. If I do a t
27 matches
Mail list logo
