Hi,
Is there a kill signal that I can send? Is there a more appropriate
command to use?
>>>
>>> Huh? Amavisd reads rules for spamassassin?
>>
>> Indirectly, yes. If you don't have something to contribute other than
>> a wise-ass answer, stfu.
>
> Watch your language and your attitude.
>
On 11/18/2012 09:07 PM, lee wrote:
> Alex writes:
>
Is there a kill signal that I can send? Is there a more appropriate
command to use?
>>> Huh? Amavisd reads rules for spamassassin?
>> Indirectly, yes. If you don't have something to contribute other than
>> a wise-ass answer, stfu.
> W
Alex writes:
>>> Is there a kill signal that I can send? Is there a more appropriate
>>> command to use?
>>
>> Huh? Amavisd reads rules for spamassassin?
>
> Indirectly, yes. If you don't have something to contribute other than
> a wise-ass answer, stfu.
Watch your language and your attitude.
>> Is there a kill signal that I can send? Is there a more appropriate
>> command to use?
>
> Huh? Amavisd reads rules for spamassassin?
Indirectly, yes. If you don't have something to contribute other than
a wise-ass answer, stfu.
Regards,
Alex
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.o
Alex writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I've discovered that when I use "service amavisd reload" to signal
> amavisd to reload the spamassassin rules, it sometimes exits
> completely. If I use restart, it works fine.
>
> However, using restart seems unecessary. What is the proper way to
> signal amavisd to re
