Re: yum update took 99.99% of cpu

Tim: >> As far as the original poster was concerned, I was thinking that >> getting a text file created would be less of a problem than taking a >> screenshot, on a system where the CPU was being pegged. It can also >> be easier to post pasted text to a mailing list, than deal with >> uploading an

Re: yum update took 99.99% of cpu

hi Tim, On 06/30/14 15:41, Tim wrote: Tim: <> Yes, that's it. When I looked at the man file, a little while ago, it just didn't jump out at me as "batch" mode being a cooked output. do not feel bad. my 'chemo brain' did not recall what i had used several years ago. i had to do a search fo

Re: yum update took 99.99% of cpu

Tim: >> Hmm, I thought top had an option for a plain text output, but I can't >> see anything suitable in the man file. Maybe, long ago, when I did >> something like that, I just did "less -R output" ("output" being the top >> text file). g: > are you thinking of: > >-b : Batch mode oper

Re: yum update took 99.99% of cpu

On 06/30/14 10:59, Tony Nelson wrote: On 14-06-30 09:19:13, Tim wrote: ... Hmm, I thought top had an option for a plain text output, but I can't see anything suitable in the man file. ... -b top -bn4 >topout i guess i should have run a fresh download before posting. :-) -- peace out

Re: yum update took 99.99% of cpu

On 06/30/14 08:19, Tim wrote: <> Hmm, I thought top had an option for a plain text output, but I can't see anything suitable in the man file. Maybe, long ago, when I did something like that, I just did "less -R output" ("output" being the top text file). are you thinking of: -b : Bat

Re: yum update took 99.99% of cpu

On 14-06-30 09:19:13, Tim wrote: ... > Hmm, I thought top had an option for a plain text output, but I can't > see anything suitable in the man file. ... -b top -bn4 >topout -- TonyN.:'

Re: yum update took 99.99% of cpu

Tim: >> Might be easier to just pipe the text output from "top" to a file, a >> few times, and post those text files. JD: > that would contain cursor postioning codes which would really mess > up the text file. > As the adage says: A picture tells a thousand words. Hmm, I thought top had an optio

Re: yum update took 99.99% of cpu

On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Tim wrote: > On Sat, 2014-06-28 at 18:54 -0600, JD wrote: > > Thus I will set up 4 gnome terminals on a desktop workspace. > > 1 will run yum, 2 will run top, 3 will run iotop > > and in 4 I will issue the command > > /usr/bin/gnome-screenshot > > ​ -f /tmp/scree

Re: yum update took 99.99% of cpu

On Sat, 2014-06-28 at 18:54 -0600, JD wrote: > Thus I will set up 4 gnome terminals on a desktop workspace. > 1 will run yum, 2 will run top, 3 will run iotop > and in 4 I will issue the command > /usr/bin/gnome-screenshot > ​ -f /tmp/screen.jpg Might be easier to just pipe the text output from "

Re: yum update took 99.99% of cpu

On 06/28/14 19:54, JD wrote: <> Very valid question. thank you. ;-) The gui desktop becomes unresponsive. But strangely enough if I have say 2 gnome terminals open in a workspace, then I am indeed able to issue commands in the gnome-terminal that is not running yum update. Thus I will set

Re: yum update took 99.99% of cpu

On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 4:19 PM, g wrote: > > > > On 06/28/14 12:43, JD wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Michael Schwendt >> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 17:02:20 -0600, JD wrote: > > <<<>>> > and the entire desktop became unresponsive. I was unable > > >>> to switch displ

Re: yum update took 99.99% of cpu

On 06/28/14 12:43, JD wrote: On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 17:02:20 -0600, JD wrote: <<<>>> and the entire desktop became unresponsive. I was unable >>> to switch display windows, of which I had 6. <> The next time I do an update, I will a

Re: yum update took 99.99% of cpu

On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 17:02:20 -0600, JD wrote: > > > FC20. > > > > I ran yum -y update. > > After all the files were downloaded, the delta processing started. From > > there on, all the way through to the end of > > installation and cleanu

Re: yum update took 99.99% of cpu

On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 17:02:20 -0600, JD wrote: > FC20. > > I ran yum -y update. > After all the files were downloaded, the delta processing started. From > there on, all the way through to the end of > installation and cleanup, cpu was 99.99% taken up > by the update process, and the entire deskto