On 04/06/2011 10:14 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> gpg: Signature made Thu 03 Mar 2011 11:34:51 AM CST using RSA key ID
> 069C8460
> gpg: Good signature from "Fedora (15) "
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belon
Ah!
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/06/2011 10:22 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
>> Okay, Trying to verify the alpha netinst.iso, I seem to have forgotten
>> the way these files work, again.
>
> Step 1 is to verify the signature on the CHECKSUM file
>
> gpg --verify *-CHECKSU
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Joel Rees wrote:
>> gpg: Signature made Thu 03 Mar 2011 12:34:51 PM JST using RSA key ID 069C8460
>> gpg: Good signature from "Fedora (15) "
>> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
>> gpg: There is no in
On 04/06/2011 10:22 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
> Okay, Trying to verify the alpha netinst.iso, I seem to have forgotten
> the way these files work, again.
Step 1 is to verify the signature on the CHECKSUM file
gpg --verify *-CHECKSUM
That gives you confidence that the data in that file comes from
Okay, Trying to verify the alpha netinst.iso, I seem to have forgotten
the way these files work, again.
gpg --verify Fedora-15-Alpha-i386-CHECKSUM Fedora-15-Alpha-i386-netinst.iso
gpg: not a detached signature
---
This is telling me that the CHECKSUM combines the signature and the checksum.
On 04/06/2011 09:38 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
> I just pushed a fix for this to the fedora-web git repository¹. When
> the website syncs next it should be on the /keys page. That is the
> proper key and fingerprint (though I don't expect you to just take my
> word for that ;).
>
> The key file
Joel Rees wrote:
> gpg: Signature made Thu 03 Mar 2011 12:34:51 PM JST using RSA key ID 069C8460
> gpg: Good signature from "Fedora (15) "
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
> Primary ke
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 11:12 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 04/05/2011 10:43 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
>>> How does one verify boot.iso for the alpha version?
>>>
>>> I've imported the key file, but I don't see a proper signature or an
>>> sha256 checksum.
>> I
On 04/05/2011 11:12 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 10:43 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
>> How does one verify boot.iso for the alpha version?
>>
>> I've imported the key file, but I don't see a proper signature or an
>> sha256 checksum.
> I downloaded from a mirror and it was there
>
> e.g.
> f
On 04/05/2011 10:43 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> How does one verify boot.iso for the alpha version?
>
> I've imported the key file, but I don't see a proper signature or an
> sha256 checksum.
I downloaded from a mirror and it was there
e.g.
ftp://ftp.isu.edu.tw:0/pub/Linux/Fedora/linux/releases/
10 matches
Mail list logo
