Re: sort of Firefox related

2020-09-22 Thread Tim via users
On Sun, 2020-09-20 at 18:06 +0930, Tim via users wrote: > I can't answer as to Firefox flatpaks, but I can with another package, > MuseScore. On my PC, a RPM version of MuseScore works as expected, the > flatpak version cannot print. You can go through the motions, select > your printer as expect

Re: sort of Firefox related

2020-09-21 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 08:25:17PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > Actually Fedora 31 and 32 both have Firefox 80.0.1. It appears that > all Firefox builds for F33 and Rawhide have failed recently, so those > two are still stuck on Firefox 78. Visit > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji and search fo

Re: sort of Firefox related

2020-09-20 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2020-09-20 at 14:59 -0500, David wrote: > Thank you Mr. Greshko and others. I know there are all kinds of info on > wiki pages and educational > videos about Fedora on the web. I will keep trying to learn. I may > have reached my peak brain-capacity > trying to live in Rawhide.

Re: sort of Firefox related

2020-09-20 Thread David
Thank you Mr. Greshko and others. I know there are all kinds of info on wiki pages and educational videos about Fedora on the web. I will keep trying to learn. I may have reached my peak brain-capacity trying to live in Rawhide.But I get a warm fuzzy feeling when it updates, especi

Re: sort of Firefox related

2020-09-20 Thread Doug McGarrett
On 9/20/20 4:36 AM, Tim via users wrote: On Sat, 2020-09-19 at 21:00 -0500, David wrote: I am not up to date on the general consensus of using flatpaks in September of 2020. I have no problem with flatpaks. Now I have to set up all my web-stuff settings again. Why would anybody want to use

Re: sort of Firefox related

2020-09-20 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2020-09-20 at 17:07 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > Second, you're posting questions about Rawhide on the "users" list. This > list is for "released" versions > > of Fedora. So, not for Rawhide and not for F33. +1 poc ___ users mailing list -- us

Re: sort of Firefox related

2020-09-20 Thread Ed Greshko
On 2020-09-20 10:00, David wrote: > I did a new install of Rawhide a few days ago, and I just assumed that the > Firefox version was the most > recent or within a few weeks of the most recent. Well there are your problems.  You've made assumptions. First problem is that you're using Rawhide and

Re: sort of Firefox related

2020-09-20 Thread Tim via users
On Sat, 2020-09-19 at 21:00 -0500, David wrote: > I am not up to date on the general consensus of using flatpaks in > September of 2020. I have no problem with flatpaks. > > Now I have to set up all my web-stuff settings again. > > Why would anybody want to use the rpm version of Firefox ?

Re: sort of Firefox related

2020-09-19 Thread Jerry James
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 8:02 PM David wrote: > I did a new install of Rawhide a few days ago, and I just assumed that the > Firefox version was the most > recent or within a few weeks of the most recent. Usually it is. > I was pondering the idea of playing with Gnome Boxes, and decided I would