Re: Slack dropping Fedora support

Michael D. Setzer II via users writes: Wonder if they understand that Fedora is the leading platform for Redhat future development. So, are they just looking at Fedora as a separate environment without understanding that it will probable be in future Redhat and probable other distros of Linux.

Re: Slack dropping Fedora support

On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 17:24:57 -0600 Chris Adams wrote: > That's probably why more are > going to Flatpak and/or Snap for distribution Appimage is another technique I've encountered. I'm running the new cura 12.0 via an appimage file now. ___ users mailin

Re: Slack dropping Fedora support

Proprietary applications tend to have trouble with the wide variety of Linux distributions and their variance. That's probably why more are going to Flatpak and/or Snap for distribution, to be able to distribute a single image that runs on Linux. Those also have an advantage of running applicatio

Re: Slack dropping Fedora support

nothing about the real world environment.. On 14 Nov 2021 at 17:27, John Westerdale wrote: From: John Westerdale Date sent: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 17:27:02 -0500 Subject:Re: Slack dropping Fedora support To: Community support for Fedora users Send reply to: Community support for Fedora

Re: Slack dropping Fedora support

This is really unfortunate. I'm part of a large US OpenStreetMap community on Slack. I'm also on OSM groups on Forums, Telegram and was on Discord. None are designed to support large diverse communities. Note we are going to create an instance of Discourse. But obviously even if the community were

Re: Slack dropping Fedora support

Got this from Slack. Fedora users represented a very small number of our user base. In order to ensure we're able to deliver the best possible experience for the largest number of users, it is necessary for Slack to focus our efforts and narrow our scope. Given the small number of users, we were n

Re: Slack dropping Fedora support

On 11/14/21 10:07, SternData wrote: This just popped up on Slack:  "Note: Starting March 1, 2022, Slack will no longer support Fedora Linux distributions." Anyone know what's going on?  And maybe interested in engaging them on Twitter @slackhq to ask for reconsideration? There was a thread a

Re: Slack dropping Fedora support

> Date: Sunday, November 14, 2021 11:22:03 -0800 > From: Clifford Snow > > I haven't seen anything on Slack indicating that the rpm will no > longer be supported. Where did this notice pop up? > > Their download page still has rpm downloads for Fedora. They also > have snap packages. I haven't

Re: Slack dropping Fedora support

On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 10:07 AM SternData wrote: > This just popped up on Slack: "Note: Starting March 1, 2022, Slack will > no longer support Fedora Linux distributions." > > Anyone know what's going on? And maybe interested in engaging them on > Twitter @slackhq to ask for reconsideration? >

Re: Slack dropping Fedora support

On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 12:07:19 -0600 SternData wrote: > Anyone know what's going on? And maybe interested in engaging them on > Twitter @slackhq to ask for reconsideration? Perhaps they finally figured out their fedora app is about 100 times more irritating than their web interface? :-). I tried

Re: slack.

ti, 2021-08-03 kello 00:59 -0700, Samuel Sieb kirjoitti: > > Some packages like Google Chrome install a .repo file. Unless it's > changed very recently, zoom does not, so it can't be updating through > Gnome Software.  Why do you think it is? > I tried looking for a .repo file and realized I wa

Re: slack.

> On 3 Aug 2021, at 08:42, Matti Pulkkinen wrote: > > ma, 2021-08-02 kello 18:44 +, Richard kirjoitti: >> >> The name on that zoom info is also a clue. If it had come from a >> fedora/redhat/centos repository it would have a repository indicator >> "fc33", "fc34", "el7." on the package nam

Re: slack.

On 2021-08-03 12:42 a.m., Matti Pulkkinen wrote: ma, 2021-08-02 kello 18:44 +, Richard kirjoitti: The name on that zoom info is also a clue. If it had come from a fedora/redhat/centos repository it would have a repository indicator "fc33", "fc34", "el7." on the package name. Zoom has packag

Re: slack.

ma, 2021-08-02 kello 18:44 +, Richard kirjoitti: > > The name on that zoom info is also a clue. If it had come from a > fedora/redhat/centos repository it would have a repository indicator > "fc33", "fc34", "el7." on the package name. Zoom has > packages available for a range of linux releases

Re: slack. [SOLVED]

On 8/2/21 11:59 AM, home user wrote: Good morning, I've been asked to join a "Slack" team.  I did a "dnf provides slack" and got nothing.  Before I try doing things the hard way (via the Slack web site), is slack actually not available via dnf, or did I do the query incorrectly (wrong name?)?

Re: slack.

On 8/2/21 12:44 PM, Richard wrote: [... snip ...] The name on that zoom info is also a clue. If it had come from a fedora/redhat/centos repository it would have a repository indicator "fc33", "fc34", "el7." on the package name. Zoom has packages available for a range of linux releases available f

Re: slack.

On 8/2/21 12:15 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2021-08-02 10:59 a.m., home user wrote: I've been asked to join a "Slack" team.  I did a "dnf provides slack" and got nothing.  Before I try doing things the hard way (via the Slack web site), is slack actually not available via dnf, or did I do the qu

Re: slack.

I use the Slack repo for Fedora. slack.repo [slack] name=slack baseurl=https://packagecloud.io/slacktechnologies/slack/fedora/21/x86_64 enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 gpgkey=https://packagecloud.io/gpg.key sslverify=1 sslcacert=/etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt Works very well and is updated regularly More

Re: slack.

On 8/2/21 12:22 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 03/08/2021 02:18, home user wrote: On 8/2/21 12:15 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2021-08-02 10:59 a.m., home user wrote: I've been asked to join a "Slack" team. I did a "dnf provides slack" and got nothing.  Before I try doing things the hard way (via the

Re: slack.

> Date: Tuesday, August 03, 2021 02:22:47 +0800 > From: Ed Greshko > > On 03/08/2021 02:18, home user wrote: >> On 8/2/21 12:15 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: >>> On 2021-08-02 10:59 a.m., home user wrote: I've been asked to join a "Slack" team. I did a "dnf provides slack" and got nothing.  B

Re: slack.

On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 at 15:19, home user wrote: > On 8/2/21 12:15 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 2021-08-02 10:59 a.m., home user wrote: > >> I've been asked to join a "Slack" team. I did a "dnf provides slack" > >> and got nothing. Before I try doing things the hard way (via the > >> Slack web si

Re: slack.

On 03/08/2021 02:18, home user wrote: On 8/2/21 12:15 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2021-08-02 10:59 a.m., home user wrote: I've been asked to join a "Slack" team. I did a "dnf provides slack" and got nothing.  Before I try doing things the hard way (via the Slack web site), is slack actually not

Re: slack.

> Date: Monday, August 02, 2021 11:15:23 -0700 > From: Samuel Sieb > > On 2021-08-02 10:59 a.m., home user wrote: >> I've been asked to join a "Slack" team.  I did a "dnf provides >> slack" and got nothing.  Before I try doing things the hard way >> (via the Slack web site), is slack actually

Re: slack.

On 8/2/21 12:15 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2021-08-02 10:59 a.m., home user wrote: I've been asked to join a "Slack" team.  I did a "dnf provides slack" and got nothing.  Before I try doing things the hard way (via the Slack web site), is slack actually not available via dnf, or did I do the qu

Re: slack.

On 03/08/2021 01:59, home user wrote: Good morning, I've been asked to join a "Slack" team.  I did a "dnf provides slack" and got nothing.  Before I try doing things the hard way (via the Slack web site), is slack actually not available via dnf, or did I do the query incorrectly (wrong name?)?

Re: slack.

On 2021-08-02 10:59 a.m., home user wrote: I've been asked to join a "Slack" team.  I did a "dnf provides slack" and got nothing.  Before I try doing things the hard way (via the Slack web site), is slack actually not available via dnf, or did I do the query incorrectly (wrong name?)? slack i

Re: slack.

On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 11:59:59 -0600 home user wrote: > I've been asked to join a "Slack" team. I always used the web site when we used it at work, didn't have any problems with it. Also installed the app on my phone just to get notifications to remind me to look at the web page :-)

Re: Slack on F29

On 11/1/18 3:42 PM, Marco Guazzone wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 9:15 PM SternData > wrote: > > It just coredumps.  Anyone solve this? > > > Yes! > I found these discussions very helpful: > - > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53084955/why-d

Re: Slack on F29

On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 9:15 PM SternData wrote: > It just coredumps. Anyone solve this? > Yes! I found these discussions very helpful: - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53084955/why-does-slack-return-a-segmentation-fault-after-fedora-29-upgrade - https://github.com/electron/electron/issues/

Re: Slack on F29 (Solved)

On 11/1/18 2:24 PM, SternData wrote: > It just coredumps. Anyone solve this? > Found a solution on stack overflow: the libnode.so that slack includes does not work on F29. The version that's included with the atom editor does. So, delete the one that comes with slack and replace it with a syml